Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse ; 49(4): 440-449, 2023 07 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37433108

ABSTRACT

Background: Illicit drug use has become a global epidemic, yet it is unclear if drug smoking increases the risk of tobacco-related cancers.Objectives: We aimed to evaluate hypothesized associations between smoking three drugs - opium, phencyclidine (PCP) and crack cocaine and lung and upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) cancers.Methods: A population-based case-control study with 611 lung cancer cases (50% male), 601 UADT cancers cases (76% male), and 1,040 controls (60% male) was conducted in Los Angeles County (1999-2004). Epidemiologic data including drug smoking histories were collected in face-to-face interviews. Associations were estimated with logistic regressions.Results: Adjusting for potential confounders, ever vs. never crack smoking was positively associated with UADT cancers (aOR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.05, 2.33), and a dose-response relationship was observed for lifetime smoking frequency (p for trend = .024). Heavy (> median) vs. never crack smoking was associated with UADT cancers (aOR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.07, 3.08) and lung cancer (aOR = 1.58, 95% CI: 0.88, 2.83). A positive association was also observed between heavy PCP smoking and UADT cancers (aOR = 2.29, 95% CI: 0.91, 5.79). Little or no associations were found between opium smoking and lung cancer or UADT cancers.Conclusion: The positive associations between illicit drug use and lung and/or UADT cancers suggest that smoking these drugs may increase the risk of tobacco-related cancers. Despite the low frequency of drug smoking and possible residual confounding, our findings may provide additional insights on the development of lung and UADT cancers.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Illicit Drugs , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Female , Opium , Phencyclidine , Cocaine Smoking , Los Angeles , Case-Control Studies , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung , Risk Factors
2.
Br J Cancer ; 118(2): 299-306, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29161239

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although low levels of folate leads to disturbances in DNA replication, DNA methylation and DNA repair, the association between dietary folate intake and head and neck cancer (HNC) risk remains unclear. METHODS: We evaluated the association between folate intake and HNC risk using prospective cohort data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial. This study included 101 700 participants and 186 cases with confirmed incident HNC. The median follow-up was 12.5 years. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using Cox proportional hazard model including age, sex, body mass index, education, race, tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking and total fruit and vegetable intake. RESULTS: Higher intake of food folate and fortified folic acid in foods was associated with a decreasing HNC risk in a dose-response manner. The HRs of highest vs the lowest quartile of intake were 0.35 (95%CI: 0.18-0.67) for food folate, and 0.49 (95%CI: 0.30-0.82) for fortified folic acid. Intakes of total folate, natural folate and supplemental folic acid were not associated with the risk of HNC and its subsites. We did not detect any interaction between smoking, drinking and food folate intake on HNC risk. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence of the protective role of dietary folate intake on HNC risk.


Subject(s)
Folic Acid/administration & dosage , Head and Neck Neoplasms/epidemiology , Aged , Cohort Studies , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Diet/statistics & numerical data , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Food, Fortified/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
3.
J Healthc Qual ; 39(5): 278-293, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28858965

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short-term effectiveness of the Intermountain Healthcare (IH) Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) for patients with prediabetes (preDM) deployed within primary care clinics. STUDY DESIGN: A quasi-experimental study design was used to deploy the DPP within the IH system to identify patients with preDM and target a primary goal of a 5% weight loss within 6-12 months of enrollment. STUDY POPULATION: Adults (aged 18-75 years) who met the American Diabetes Association criteria for preDM were included for study. Patients who attended DPP counseling between August 2013 and July 2014 were considered as the intervention (or DPP) group. The DPP group was matched using propensity scores at a 1:4 ratio with a control group of patients with preDM who did not participate in DPP. RESULTS: Of the 17,142 patients who met the inclusion criteria for preDM, 40% had an in-person office visit with their provider. On average, patients were 58 years old, and greater than 60% were women. Based on multivariate logistic regression, the DPP group was more likely to achieve a 5% weight loss within 6-12 months after enrollment (OR = 1.70; 95% CI = 1.29-2.25; p < .001) when compared with the no-DPP group. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes Prevention Program-based lifestyle interventions demonstrated significant reduction in body weight and incident Type 2 diabetes mellitus when compared with nonenrollees.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/prevention & control , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Patient Education as Topic/organization & administration , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Health Promotion/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Program Evaluation
4.
Br J Cancer ; 113(5): 809-16, 2015 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26291054

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The association between coffee intake, tea intake and cancer has been extensively studied, but associations are not established for many cancers. Previous studies are not consistent on whether caffeine may be the source of possible associations between coffee and cancer risk. METHODS: In the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian cancer screening trial, of the 97,334 eligible individuals, 10,399 developed cancer. Cancers included were 145 head and neck, 99 oesophageal, 136 stomach, 1137 lung, 1703 breast, 257 endometrial, 162 ovarian, 3037 prostate, 318 kidney, 398 bladder, 103 gliomas, and 106 thyroid. RESULTS: Mean coffee intake was higher in lower education groups, among current smokers, among heavier and longer duration smokers, and among heavier alcohol drinkers. Coffee intake was not associated with the risk of all cancers combined (RR=1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.96-1.05), whereas tea drinking was associated with a decreased risk of cancer overall (RR=0.95, 95% CI=0.94-0.96 for 1+ cups per day vs <1 cup per day). For endometrial cancer, a decreased risk was observed for coffee intake (RR=0.69, 95% CI=0,52-0.91 for ⩾2 cups per day). Caffeine intake was not associated with cancer risk in a dose-response manner. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a decreased risk of endometrial cancer for coffee intake, and a decreased risk of cancer overall with tea intake.


Subject(s)
Coffee , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Tea , Aged , Caffeine , Colorectal Neoplasms/etiology , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/etiology , Prospective Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Risk Factors
5.
Int J Cancer ; 136(4): 904-14, 2015 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24974959

ABSTRACT

There are suggestions of an inverse association between folate intake and serum folate levels and the risk of oral cavity and pharyngeal cancers (OPCs), but most studies are limited in sample size, with only few reporting information on the source of dietary folate. Our study aims to investigate the association between folate intake and the risk of OPC within the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology (INHANCE) Consortium. We analyzed pooled individual-level data from ten case-control studies participating in the INHANCE consortium, including 5,127 cases and 13,249 controls. Odds ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for the associations between total folate intake (natural, fortification and supplementation) and natural folate only, and OPC risk. We found an inverse association between total folate intake and overall OPC risk (the adjusted OR for the highest vs. the lowest quintile was 0.65, 95% CI: 0.43-0.99), with a stronger association for oral cavity (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.43-0.75). A similar inverse association, though somewhat weaker, was observed for folate intake from natural sources only in oral cavity cancer (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.45-0.91). The highest OPC risk was observed in heavy alcohol drinkers with low folate intake as compared to never/light drinkers with high folate (OR = 4.05, 95% CI: 3.43-4.79); the attributable proportion (AP) owing to interaction was 11.1% (95% CI: 1.4-20.8%). Lastly, we reported an OR of 2.73 (95% CI:2.34-3.19) for those ever tobacco users with low folate intake, compared with nevere tobacco users and high folate intake (AP of interaction =10.6%, 95% CI: 0.41-20.8%). Our project of a large pool of case-control studies supports a protective effect of total folate intake on OPC risk.


Subject(s)
Anticarcinogenic Agents/administration & dosage , Dietary Supplements , Folic Acid/administration & dosage , Mouth Neoplasms/prevention & control , Pharyngeal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Administration, Oral , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Mouth Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pharyngeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Risk
6.
Cancer Causes Control ; 24(2): 267-76, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23247638

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coffee contains many compounds, including antioxidants, which could prevent cancerogenesis, and coffee has been related with lower incidence of cancer at several sites. Tea is also rich in antioxidants, mainly polyphenols. To provide a quantitative overall estimate on the relation between coffee and tea consumption and glioma, we combined all published data, using a meta-analytic approach. METHODS: In September 2012, a bibliography search was carried out in both PubMed and Embase to identify observational studies providing quantitative estimates on the issue. Pooled estimates of the relative risks (RR) and the corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS: Six studies (four cohort and two case-control studies) were available for meta-analysis, for a total of about 2100 cases. The summary RRs and 95 % CIs of glioma for drinkers versus non/occasional drinkers were 0.96 (95 % CI: 0.81-1.13) for coffee and 0.86 (95 % CI: 0.78-0.94) for tea, with no heterogeneity between studies. When we compared the highest versus the lowest categories of consumption, the RRs were 1.01 (95 % CI: 0.83-1.22) for coffee, 0.88 (95 % CI: 0.69-1.12) for tea, and 0.75 (95 % CI: 0.54-1.05) for coffee plus tea. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis, although based on few studies, suggests a lack of association between coffee intake and glioma risk, and a tendency, if any, to a lower risk for tea and coffee plus tea drinkers.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/epidemiology , Coffee , Glioma/epidemiology , Tea , Adult , Brain Neoplasms/etiology , Brain Neoplasms/prevention & control , Glioma/etiology , Glioma/prevention & control , Humans , Risk Factors
7.
Int J Cancer ; 131(7): 1686-99, 2012 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22173631

ABSTRACT

To investigate the potential role of vitamin or mineral supplementation on the risk of head and neck cancer (HNC), we analyzed individual-level pooled data from 12 case-control studies (7,002 HNC cases and 8,383 controls) participating in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology consortium. There were a total of 2,028 oral cavity cancer, 2,465 pharyngeal cancer, 874 unspecified oral/pharynx cancer, 1,329 laryngeal cancer and 306 overlapping HNC cases. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for self reported ever use of any vitamins, multivitamins, vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin E, and calcium, beta-carotene, iron, selenium and zinc supplements were assessed. We further examined frequency, duration and cumulative exposure of each vitamin or mineral when possible and stratified by smoking and drinking status. All ORs were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, study center, education level, pack-years of smoking, frequency of alcohol drinking and fruit/vegetable intake. A decreased risk of HNC was observed with ever use of vitamin C (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.59-0.96) and with ever use of calcium supplement (OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.42-0.97). The inverse association with HNC risk was also observed for 10 or more years of vitamin C use (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.54-0.97) and more than 365 tablets of cumulative calcium intake (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.16-0.83), but linear trends were not observed for the frequency or duration of any supplement intake. We did not observe any strong associations between vitamin or mineral supplement intake and the risk of HNC.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Head and Neck Neoplasms/epidemiology , Minerals , Vitamins , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
8.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 19(7): 1723-36, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20570908

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Only a few studies have explored the relation between coffee and tea intake and head and neck cancers, with inconsistent results. METHODS: We pooled individual-level data from nine case-control studies of head and neck cancers, including 5,139 cases and 9,028 controls. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Caffeinated coffee intake was inversely related with the risk of cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx: the ORs were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.98) for an increment of 1 cup per day and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.47-0.80) in drinkers of >4 cups per day versus nondrinkers. This latter estimate was consistent for different anatomic sites (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30-0.71 for oral cavity; OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41-0.82 for oropharynx/hypopharynx; and OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.37-1.01 for oral cavity/pharynx not otherwise specified) and across strata of selected covariates. No association of caffeinated coffee drinking was found with laryngeal cancer (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.64-1.45 in drinkers of >4 cups per day versus nondrinkers). Data on decaffeinated coffee were too sparse for detailed analysis, but indicated no increased risk. Tea intake was not associated with head and neck cancer risk (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.11 for drinkers versus nondrinkers). CONCLUSIONS: This pooled analysis of case-control studies supports the hypothesis of an inverse association between caffeinated coffee drinking and risk of cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx. IMPACT: Given widespread use of coffee and the relatively high incidence and low survival of head and neck cancers, the observed inverse association may have appreciable public health relevance.


Subject(s)
Coffee/adverse effects , Head and Neck Neoplasms/epidemiology , Tea/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Caffeine/administration & dosage , Caffeine/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/chemically induced , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/chemically induced , Mouth Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pharyngeal Neoplasms/chemically induced , Pharyngeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL