Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 78(4): 1034-1040, 2023 04 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36869724

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 who received three-drug combination regimens for treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections during a single-centre outbreak. Our objective was to describe the clinical outcomes and molecular characteristics and in vitro synergy of antibiotics against CRAB isolates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with severe COVID-19 admitted between April and July 2020 with CRAB infections were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical success was defined as resolution of signs/symptoms of infection without need for additional antibiotics. Representative isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and in vitro synergy of two- or three-drug combinations was assessed by checkerboard and time-kill assays, respectively. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with CRAB pneumonia or bacteraemia were included. Treatment regimens included high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam, meropenem, plus polymyxin B (SUL/MEM/PMB; 72%), SUL/PMB plus minocycline (MIN; 17%) or other combinations (12%). Clinical resolution was achieved in 50% of patients and 30-day mortality was 22% (4/18). Seven patients had recurrent infections, during which further antimicrobial resistance to SUL or PMB was not evident. PMB/SUL was the most active two-drug combination by checkerboard. Paired isolates collected before and after treatment with SUL/MEM/PMB did not demonstrate new gene mutations or differences in the activity of two- or three-drug combinations. CONCLUSIONS: Use of three-drug regimens for severe CRAB infections among COVID-19 resulted in high rates of clinical response and low mortality relative to previous studies. The emergence of further antibiotic resistance was not detected phenotypically or through WGS analysis. Additional studies are needed to elucidate preferred antibiotic combinations linked to the molecular characteristics of infecting strains.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections , Acinetobacter baumannii , COVID-19 , Humans , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Acinetobacter Infections/drug therapy , Drug Synergism , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Acinetobacter baumannii/genetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
2.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 101(2): 115483, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34339950

ABSTRACT

Revised breakpoints for cefazolin (CFZ) against Enterobacterales may be difficult to implement with current automated susceptibility testing platforms and could falsely report organisms as susceptible, leading to inappropriate treatment for bloodstream infections (BSI). This was a retrospective cohort of adult patients with Enterobacterales BSI reported CFZ susceptible per Vitek®2. The primary outcome was the percentage susceptible by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) Gradient Test Strips and disk diffusion. Secondary outcomes included clinical outcomes between CFZ and non-CFZ-treated patients. Among 195 isolates reported CFZ-susceptible per Vitek®2, 84 (43.1%) were CFZ susceptible by MIC Gradient Test Strips vs 119 (61%) by disk diffusion. No difference was noted in 30-day all-cause mortality, secondary complications, or 30-day readmissions. Treatment failure was less likely to occur with source control (adjusted OR 0.06) and infectious disease consult (adjusted OR 0.37). There was a large degree of discrepancy between automated testing and manual methods; the clinical impact of this discrepancy warrants further investigation.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Automation, Laboratory , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Bacteremia/microbiology , Cefazolin/pharmacology , Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Female , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/standards , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 22(3): 265-271, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33090037

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Nosocomial pneumonias are the second most common healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs), often associated with the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter species, and Enterobacter species. Increasing use of carbapenems has led to an increase in the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative organisms, such as carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), P. aeruginosa (CRPA), and Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), limiting treatment options for patients at high-risk of multi-drug resistant (MDR) gram-negative pathogens. Areas covered: The purpose of this review is to discuss the role of meropenem/vaborbactam, a beta-lactam combined with a novel non-beta-lactam cyclic boronic acid beta-lactamase inhibitor (BLI), for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia based on its chemistry, pharmacokinetics/dynamics, microbiological spectrum of activity, mechanisms of resistance, safety, and clinical efficacy. Expert opinion: Currently, any utilization of meropenem/vaborbactam beyond its FDA-approved indication for complicated urinary tract infections is considered off-label use; however, based on the pulmonary penetration of meropenem/vaborbactam, it is highly likely to be a safe and effective alternative to more toxic agents, like aminoglycosides and polymixins, for targeted therapy in pulmonary infections due to CRE. Unfortunately, the multifactorial resistance pattern of CRPA and other non-lactose-fermenting gram-negative bacteria restricts activity against these organisms which are common pathogens implicated in nosocomial pneumonia.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Boronic Acids , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia/drug therapy , Humans , Meropenem , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
4.
PLoS One ; 14(1): e0210271, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30615655

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Beta-lactams are the mainstay for treating methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections complicated by bacteremia due to superior outcomes compared with vancomycin. With approximately 11% of inpatients reporting a penicillin (PCN) allergy, many patients receive suboptimal treatment for MSSA bacteremia. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of penicillin skin testing (PST) in adult patients with self-reported PCN allergy in an inpatient setting undergoing treatment for MSSA bacteremia. METHODS: A decision analytic model was developed comparing an acute care PST intervention to a scenario with no confirmatory allergy testing. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) from the health-sector perspective over a 1-year time horizon using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as the measure for effectiveness. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the uncertainty of the ICER estimation. RESULTS: Over a 1-year time horizon, PST services applied to all MSSA bacteremia patients reporting a PCN-allergy would result in a cost per patient of $12,559 and 0.73 QALYs while no PST services would have a higher cost per patient of $13,219 and 0.66 QALYs per patient. This resulted in a cost-effectiveness estimate of -$9,429 per QALY gained. Varying the cost of implementing PST services determined a break-even point of $959.98 where any PST cost less than this amount would actually be cost saving. CONCLUSIONS: Patients reporting a PCN allergy on admission may receive sub-optimal alternative therapies to beta-lactams, such as vancomycin, for MSSA bacteremia. This economic analysis demonstrates that inpatient PST services confirming PCN allergy are cost-effective for patients with MSSA bacteremia.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Bacteremia/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/economics , Penicillins/adverse effects , Skin Tests/economics , Staphylococcal Infections/complications , Adult , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/microbiology , Humans , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology
5.
J Clin Microbiol ; 54(4): 840-4, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26791363

ABSTRACT

In 2010, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) lowered the MIC breakpoints for many beta-lactam antibiotics to enhance detection of known resistance amongEnterobacteriaceae The decision to implement these new breakpoints, including the changes announced in both 2010 and 2014, can have a significant impact on both microbiology laboratories and antimicrobial stewardship programs. In this commentary, we discuss the changes and how implementation of these updated CLSI breakpoints requires partnership between antimicrobial stewardship programs and the microbiology laboratory, including data on the impact that the changes had on antibiotic usage at our own institution.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/drug therapy , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/standards , Drug Therapy/methods , Drug Therapy/standards , Drug Utilization/standards , Humans , beta-Lactams/pharmacology , beta-Lactams/therapeutic use
6.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 60(3): 1899-901, 2015 Dec 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26711770

ABSTRACT

Extended-infusion ceftolozane-tazobactam treatment at 1.5 g every 8 h was used to treat multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a critically ill patient on continuous venovenous hemofiltration. Serum drug concentrations were measured at 1, 4, 5, 6, and 8 h after the start of infusion. Prefilter levels of ceftolozane produced a maximum concentration of drug (Cmax) of 38.57 µg/ml, concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Cmin) of 31.63 µg/ml, time to Cmax (Tmax) of 4 h, area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h (AUC0-8) of 284.38 µg · h/ml, and a half-life (t1/2) of 30.7 h. The concentrations were eight times the susceptibility breakpoint for the entire dosing interval.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Cephalosporins/pharmacokinetics , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Penicillanic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Critical Illness , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Hemofiltration , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Penicillanic Acid/pharmacokinetics , Penicillanic Acid/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis-Related Infections/drug therapy , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Tazobactam
7.
Pharmacotherapy ; 35(1): 54-8, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25556715

ABSTRACT

In the management of multidrug-resistant infections in critically ill patients with multiorgan dysfunction, consideration must be given to the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an antimicrobial agent to optimize dosing. We describe a 25-year-old woman who was undergoing thrice-weekly hemodialysis and developed multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia secondary to infected left and right ventricular assist devices. After multiple courses of antibiotics, her blood cultures revealed that the infecting organism was becoming progressively more resistant to antibiotic options. Cefepime 2 g administered over 3 hours/day (in combination with colistimethate) provided adequate drug levels for multidrug-resistant, cefepime-intermediate P. aeruginosa bacteremia in this patient. We present the clinical case of this patient, followed by a discussion of possible therapeutic approaches to be considered, including illustration of the principles of using extended-infusion antimicrobial regimens, and present the patient's resulting clinical course.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cephalosporins/administration & dosage , Colistin/analogs & derivatives , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/drug effects , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/blood , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cefepime , Cephalosporins/blood , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Colistin/administration & dosage , Colistin/blood , Colistin/therapeutic use , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Heart-Assist Devices/microbiology , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Metabolic Clearance Rate , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Pseudomonas Infections/etiology , Pseudomonas Infections/microbiology , Renal Dialysis , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
8.
Ann Pharmacother ; 48(1): 123-7, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24259631

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the management strategy for a multidrug-resistant (MDR) Klebsiella urinary tract infection (UTI). CASE SUMMARY: A 69-year-old Caucasian woman with a past medical history of recurrent UTIs and a right-lung transplant presented with fever to 101.4°F, chills, malaise, and cloudy, foul-smelling urine for approximately 1 week. She was found to have a MDR Klebsiella UTI that was sensitive to tigecycline and cefepime. To further evaluate the degree of resistance Etest minimum inhibitory concentrations were requested for cefepime, amikacin, meropenem, and ertapenem. The patient received a 14-day course of amikacin, which resulted in resolution of her symptoms. One month later, the patient's UTI symptoms returned. The urine culture again grew MDR Klebsiella, sensitive only to tigecycline. Fosfomycin was initiated and resulted in limited resolution of her symptoms. Colistin was started, however, therapy was discontinued on day 5 secondary to the development of acute kidney injury. Despite the short course of therapy, the patient's symptoms resolved. DISCUSSION: The case presented lends itself well to numerous discussion items that are important to consider when determining optimal treatment for MDR Gram-negative bacilli (GNBs). Susceptibility testing is an important tool for optimizing antibiotic therapy, however, automated systems may overestimate the susceptibility profile for a MDR GNB. Treatment strategies evaluated to treat MDR GNB, include combination therapy with a carbepenem and synergy using polymyxin. CONCLUSION: We have described the management strategy for a MDR Klebsiella UTI, the consequences of the initial management strategy, and potential strategies to manage these types of infections in future patients.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Colistin/therapeutic use , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Colistin/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Female , Humans , Klebsiella/drug effects , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL