Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM
Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Clin Lab ; 66(3)2020 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32162868

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) gene urine assay is established for biopsy decision in case of prostate cancer (PC) suspicion. Recent findings pointed to an age dependence of PCA3, with putative impact on test interpretation. However, to date no experience has been reported with regard to the extent age might modify the score in certain age ranges. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to re-evaluate the age dependency and, moreover, give suggestions for interpretation of the PCA3 score in dependence of patient's age in daily routine. METHODS: The study comprised 684 patients before prostate biopsy or prostatectomy. Post-massage voided urine samples were assessed by PCA3 measurement. PCA3 scores were correlated to patient's age. The collective was divided into four subcollectives by quartiles of age distribution. For every subcollective the cutoff value at specificity of ≥ 60 was determined. Results were classified by age-class specific cutoff values and test qualities were compared at different cutoffs. RESULTS: In the collective, 59.1% of patients had a positive biopsy. PCA3 correlated to patient's age in univariate and multivariate analysis (p < 0.001 each). The division into age subcollectives revealed groups < 60, 60 - 65, 66 - 69 and > 69 years. Median PCA3 values of patients without/with PC were 17/32, 27/42, 34/55 and 52/68 in the four age classes. Cutoff values for which specificity was determined with ≥ 60 were 23, 39, 42, and 65. Constant cutoff values showed lower sensitivities in younger and lower specificities in older patients. Only the age adjusted values revealed an improved performance with PPV 68.7, accuracy 59.5 and sensitivity 57.7 at specificity of 62.1% in the whole cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms that the PCA3 score increases with age. The recommended cutoff score of 35 is suitable especially for patients aged in their sixties. Lower reference values between 20 and 30 have to be taken into account in patients aged < 60 years and higher values around 40 to 50 may point to suspicion for PC in patients > 69 years. These results may further improve the diagnostic performance of the PCA3 test and keep the PCA3 test as a significant test in PC diagnostics along with new upcoming urine markers.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Neoplasm/urine , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor/urine , Biopsy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostate/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/urine , Reference Values , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Prostate ; 69(9): 917-27, 2009 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19267352

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A phase I/II trial was conducted to assess feasibility and tolerability of tumor associated antigen peptide vaccination in hormone sensitive prostate carcinoma (PC) patients with biochemical recurrence after primary surgical treatment. METHODS: Nineteen HLA-A2 positive patients with rising PSA without detectable metastatic disease or local recurrence received 11 HLA-A*0201-restricted and two HLA class II synthetic peptides derived from PC tumor antigens subcutaneously for 18 months or until PSA progression. The vaccine was emulgated in montanide ISA51 and combined with imiquimod, GM-CSF, mucin-1-mRNA/protamine complex, local hyperthermia or no adjuvant. PSA was assessed, geometric mean doubling times (DT) calculated and clinical performance monitored. RESULTS: PSA DT of 4 out of 19 patients (21%) increased from 4.9 to 25.8 months during vaccination. Out of these, two patients (11%) exhibited PSA stability for 28 and 31 months which were still continuing at data cut-off. One patient showed no change of PSA DT during vaccination but decline after the therapy. Three patients had an interim PSA decline or DT increase followed by DT decrease compared to baseline PSA DT. Three of the responding patients received imiquimod and one the mucin-1-mRNA/protamine complex as adjuvant; both are Toll-like receptor-7 agonists. Eleven (58%) patients had progressive PSA values. The vaccine was well tolerated, and no grade III or IV toxicity occurred. CONCLUSION: Multi-peptide vaccination stabilized or slowed down PSA progress in four of 19 cases. The vaccination approach is promising with moderate adverse events. Long-term stability delayed androgen deprivation up to 31 months. TLR-7 co-activation seems to be beneficial.


Subject(s)
Cancer Vaccines/administration & dosage , HLA-A2 Antigen/administration & dosage , Peptide Fragments/administration & dosage , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/immunology , Aged , Aminoquinolines/administration & dosage , Antigens, Neoplasm/administration & dosage , Antigens, Neoplasm/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Cancer Vaccines/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , HLA-A2 Antigen/adverse effects , Hormones , Humans , Hyperthermia, Induced , Imiquimod , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Mannitol/administration & dosage , Mannitol/analogs & derivatives , Middle Aged , Mucin-1/genetics , Oleic Acids/administration & dosage , Peptide Fragments/adverse effects , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Protamines/administration & dosage , RNA, Messenger/administration & dosage , Secondary Prevention , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL