Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Environ Sci Technol ; 49(22): 13190-8, 2015 Nov 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26463837

ABSTRACT

Stream and river restoration activities have recently begun to emphasize the enhancement of biogeochemical processing within river networks through the restoration of river-floodplain connectivity. It is generally accepted that this practice removes pollutants such as nitrogen and phosphorus because the increased contact time of nutrient-rich floodwaters with reactive floodplain sediments. Our study examines this assumption in the floodplain of a recently restored, low-order stream through five seasonal experiments. During each experiment, a floodplain slough was artificially inundated for 3 h. Both the net flux of dissolved nutrients and nitrogen uptake rate were measured during each experiment. The slough was typically a source of dissolved phosphorus and dissolved organic matter, a sink of NO3(-), and variable source/sink of ammonium. NO3(-) uptake rates were relatively high when compared to riverine uptake, especially during the spring and summer experiments. However, when scaled up to the entire 1 km restoration reach with a simple inundation model, less than 0.5-1.5% of the annual NO3(-) load would be removed because of the short duration of river-floodplain connectivity. These results suggest that restoring river-floodplain connectivity is not necessarily an appropriate best management practice for nutrient removal in low-order streams with legacy soil nutrients from past agricultural landuse.


Subject(s)
Environmental Restoration and Remediation/methods , Nitrogen/analysis , Rivers , Agriculture , Ecosystem , Floods , Nitrates/analysis , Phosphorus/analysis , Seasons , Soil , Virginia
2.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 101(39): 14132-7, 2004 Sep 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15381768

ABSTRACT

A study of 16 streams in eastern North America shows that riparian deforestation causes channel narrowing, which reduces the total amount of stream habitat and ecosystem per unit channel length and compromises in-stream processing of pollutants. Wide forest reaches had more macroinvertebrates, total ecosystem processing of organic matter, and nitrogen uptake per unit channel length than contiguous narrow deforested reaches. Stream narrowing nullified any potential advantages of deforestation regarding abundance of fish, quality of dissolved organic matter, and pesticide degradation. These findings show that forested stream channels have a wider and more natural configuration, which significantly affects the total in-stream amount and activity of the ecosystem, including the processing of pollutants. The results reinforce both current policy of the United States that endorses riparian forest buffers as best management practice and federal and state programs that subsidize riparian reforestation for stream restoration and water quality. Not only do forest buffers prevent nonpoint source pollutants from entering small streams, they also enhance the in-stream processing of both nonpoint and point source pollutants, thereby reducing their impact on downstream rivers and estuaries.


Subject(s)
Conservation of Natural Resources , Ecosystem , Fresh Water , Water Movements , Animals , Atrazine/analysis , Atrazine/metabolism , Environmental Monitoring , Fishes , Invertebrates , Linuron/analysis , Linuron/metabolism , Nitrogen/analysis , Nitrogen/metabolism , Organic Chemicals/analysis , Organic Chemicals/metabolism , Phosphorus/analysis , Phosphorus/metabolism , Population Dynamics , Water Supply
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL