Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Complementary Medicines
Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 66(8): 1103-8, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23664572

ABSTRACT

Midface advancement with distraction osteogenesis using the rigid external device (RED) is an effective but invasive treatment to correct the hypoplastic midface. This study draws up an inventory of the stressors, needs and coping strategies of families during this treatment, to determine the best conditions for family-centred care. Data were collected by reviewing the patients' files and administering semi-structured interviews. The data were analysed using the software program Atlas.ti and were re-analysed by an independent researcher. Parents and patients were interviewed separately. Fourteen families participated. Four patients had an absolute indication for surgery. All families were eager to have the patient's facial appearance improved. Nevertheless, despite psychological counselling, they experienced stress when confronted with the changed facial appearance. Another stressor was weight loss. Six patients were in a state of acute malnutrition and needed supplementary feeding. We conclude that the best conditions for family-centred care should be aligned to the different phases of treatment. Leading up to surgery it is important to screen families' expectations regarding aesthetic, functional and social outcomes and to assess their capacity to cope with the long treatment and effects of changed facial appearance. Peer contact and psychosocial training to increase self-esteem are tools to enhance co-operation and satisfaction. During the distraction and stabilisation phase, we advise the monitoring of nutritional intake and weight. During all phases of treatment easy accessibility to the team is recommended.


Subject(s)
Craniofacial Dysostosis/psychology , Craniofacial Dysostosis/surgery , Osteogenesis, Distraction/psychology , Parents/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Counseling , Decision Making , Eating , Esthetics/psychology , External Fixators , Family/psychology , Humans , Osteogenesis, Distraction/adverse effects , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Satisfaction , Retrospective Studies , Self Efficacy , Social Participation , Time Factors , Weight Loss , Young Adult
2.
J Nutr Health Aging ; 13(9): 769-75, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19812866

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Elderly people may benefit from sensory stimulation to increase food intake since anorexia of ageing is prevalent among them. An optimal MSG concentration may increase the palatability of foods but this depends on the food and chemosensory status of the taster. Currently, the results on taste enhancing to increase intake are inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: To find an optimal preferred MSG concentration in mashed potatoes, spinach and ground beef and to determine whether this concentration increases consumption of these foods among institutionalized elderly people. DESIGN: Single blind within subject cross-over study performed at the laboratory and in the residents' own apartments. PARTICIPANTS: 33 elderly and 29 young people in the sensory study and 53 elderly people in the intake study. MEASUREMENTS: Pleasantness of the foods was rated of the foods each with 0, 0.5, 0.8, 1.3 and 2.0 g of MSG/100g. Intake was measured by weighing back leftovers of 2 meals with MSG (0.5% in mashed potatoes, 2% in spinach and ground meat) and without MSG. RESULTS: 0.5% MSG (p < 0.05) was preferred in mashed potatoes but no optimal preferred concentration was found for spinach and ground beef, possibly because of their complex taste. Intake was not different between the foods with and without MSG or the total meal (all p > 0.68). CONCLUSION: MSG (0.5% and 2%) does not guarantee a higher intake among elderly. The chemosensory heterogeneity of the elderly population requires more individual flavor enhancement to improve the dietary intake and sensory experience.


Subject(s)
Energy Intake/drug effects , Food Additives/pharmacology , Sodium Glutamate/pharmacology , Taste/drug effects , Aged, 80 and over , Aging , Anorexia , Cross-Over Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Food Additives/administration & dosage , Homes for the Aged , Humans , Male , Meat Products/analysis , Nursing Homes , Single-Blind Method , Sodium Glutamate/administration & dosage , Solanum tuberosum/chemistry , Spinacia oleracea/chemistry , Young Adult
3.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 58(2): 343-9, 2004 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14749756

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To measure the bioavailability of selenium from cooked and raw fish in humans by estimating and comparing apparent absorption and retention of selenium in biosynthetically labelled fish with labelled selenate and biosynthetically labelled selenium in brewers yeast. DESIGN: The intervention study was a parallel, randomised, reference substance controlled design carried out at two different centres in Europe. SETTING: The human study was carried out at the Institute of Food Research, Norwich, UK and at TNO Nutrition and Food Research, Zeist, The Netherlands. SUBJECTS: In all, 35 male volunteers aged 18-50 y were recruited; 17 subjects were studied in Norwich (UK) and 18 in Zeist (Netherlands). All of the recruited subjects completed the study. INTERVENTIONS: Biosynthetically labelled trout fish (processed by two different methods), biosynthetically labelled brewers yeast and isotopically labelled selenate were used to estimate selenium apparent absorption and retention by quantitative analysis of stable isotope labels recovered in faeces and urine. Subjects consumed the labelled foods in four meals over two consecutive days and absorption was measured by the luminal disappearance method over 10 days. Urinary clearance of isotopic labels was measured over 7 days to enable retention to be calculated. RESULTS: Apparent absorption of selenium from fish was similar to selenate and there was no difference between the two processing methods used. However, retention of fish selenium was significantly higher than selenate (P<0.001). Apparent absorption and retention of yeast selenium was significantly different (P<0.001) from both fish selenium and selenate. CONCLUSION: Fish selenium is a highly bioavailable source of dietary selenium. Cooking did not affect selenium apparent absorption or retention from fish. Selenium from yeast is less bioavailable.


Subject(s)
Fish Products/analysis , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism , Selenium Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Selenium/pharmacokinetics , Trout , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Biological Availability , Cooking , Feces/chemistry , Humans , Intestinal Absorption/physiology , Isotopes , Male , Middle Aged , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/chemistry , Selenic Acid , Selenium/administration & dosage , Selenium/urine , Selenium Compounds/administration & dosage , Selenium Compounds/urine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL