Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Sleep Res ; 33(1): e13992, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37577773

ABSTRACT

Sleep disturbances are present in ~65% of individuals with generalised anxiety disorder (GAD). Although both Kundalini yoga (KY) and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) are effective treatment options for GAD, little is known about how these treatments compare in improving sleep for GAD and what drives these changes. Accordingly, we examined the effects of CBT, KY, and stress education (SEdu; an attention control condition) on subjective sleep quality (as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI] and Insomnia Severity Index [ISI]) in a randomised controlled trial of 226 adults with GAD (mean age 33.37 years; 70% female; 79% White). We hypothesised that both CBT and KY would outperform SEdu in improving sleep disturbances. Three potential mediators of sleep improvement (worry, mindfulness, perceived stress) were also examined. In line with hypotheses, PSQI and ISI scores significantly improved from pre- to post-treatment for all three treatment groups (all p < 0.001, all d > 0.97). However, contrary to predictions, sleep changes were not significantly greater for CBT or KY compared to SEdu. In mediation analyses, within-person deviations in worry, mindfulness, and stress each significantly mediated the effect of time on sleep outcomes. Degree of change in sleep attributable to worry (CBT > KY > SEdu) and perceived stress (CBT, KY > SEdu) was moderated by treatment group. Personalised medicine as well as combined treatment approaches should be studied to help reduce sleep difficulties for patients with GAD who do not respond.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Mindfulness , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Yoga , Adult , Humans , Female , Male , Sleep Quality , Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Stress, Psychological/therapy
2.
J Psychiatr Res ; 153: 109-115, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35810600

ABSTRACT

There is some, but inconsistent, evidence to suggest that matching patient treatment preference enhances treatment engagement and outcome. The current study examined differential preferences and factors associated with treatment preference for 12-week group cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), yoga, or stress education in 226 adults with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD; 70% female, Mean age = 33 ± 13.5). In a subsample of 165 patients who reported an intervention preference and were randomized to yoga or CBT, we further examined whether match to preferred intervention improved the primary treatment outcome (responder status on Clinical Global Impressions Scale) and engagement (dropout, homework compliance). Preferences for CBT (44%) and yoga (40%) were similar among patients. Women tended to prefer yoga (OR = 2.75, p = .01) and CBT preference was associated with higher baseline perceived stress (OR = 0.92, p = .04) and self-consciousness meta-cognitions (OR = 0.90, p = .02). Among those not matched to their preference, treatment response was higher for those receiving CBT than yoga (OR = 11.73, p = .013); there were no group differences for those matched to their treatment preference. In yoga, those who received their preference were more likely to drop than those who did not (OR = 3.02, 95% CI = [1.20, 7.58], p = .037). This was not the case for CBT (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = [0.13, 1.03], p = .076). Preference match did not predict homework compliance. Overall, results suggest that treatment preference may be important to consider to optimize outcome and engagement; however, it may vary by treatment modality. Future research incorporating preference, especially with yoga for anxiety, is aligned with personalized medicine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01912287; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01912287.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Yoga , Adult , Anxiety , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Yoga/psychology , Young Adult
3.
Psychother Psychosom ; 91(4): 277-285, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35588706

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is severe, chronic, and undertreated. Apps could substantially improve treatment access. OBJECTIVE: We provide an initial test of the usability and efficacy of coach-supported app-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for BDD. The Perspectives app covers core treatment components: psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring, exposure with response prevention, mindfulness, attention retraining, and relapse prevention. METHODS: A randomized waitlist-controlled trial was conducted. Adults (N = 80) with primary BDD were assigned to 12 weeks of Perspectives or waitlist. Coaches promoted engagement and answered questions via in-app messaging and phone calls. BDD severity was measured at baseline, mid-treatment, and end of treatment by blinded independent evaluators (Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for BDD; BDD-YBOCS). Secondary outcomes included BDD-related insight, depression, quality of life, and functioning. RESULTS: App uptake and satisfaction were high. In intent-to-treat analyses, Perspectives app-based CBT was associated with significantly lower BDD-YBOCS severity at end of treatment (M [SD]: 16.8 [7.5]) compared to the waitlist (26.7 [6.2]; p < 0.001, d = 1.44). App-based CBT was associated with greater improvements across all secondary measures, with medium to large effects. CONCLUSIONS: Perspectives, supported by a bachelor's-level coach, is an efficacious, scalable treatment for adults with BDD.


Subject(s)
Body Dysmorphic Disorders , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Mobile Applications , Adult , Body Dysmorphic Disorders/psychology , Body Dysmorphic Disorders/therapy , Humans , Quality of Life/psychology , Treatment Outcome
4.
JAMA Psychiatry ; 78(1): 13-20, 2021 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32805013

ABSTRACT

Importance: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is common, impairing, and undertreated. Although many patients with GAD seek complementary and alternative interventions, including yoga, data supporting yoga's efficacy or how it compares to first-line treatments are lacking. Objectives: To assess whether yoga (Kundalini yoga) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for GAD are each more effective than a control condition (stress education) and whether yoga is noninferior to CBT for the treatment of GAD. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this randomized, 3-arm, controlled, single-blind (masked independent raters) clinical trial, participants were recruited from 2 specialty academic centers starting December 1, 2013, with assessment ending October 25, 2019. Primary analyses, completed by February 12, 2020, included superiority testing of Kundalini yoga and CBT vs stress education and noninferiority testing of Kundalini yoga vs CBT. Interventions: Participants were randomized to Kundalini yoga (n = 93), CBT for GAD (n = 90), or stress education (n = 43), which were each delivered to groups of 4 to 6 participants by 2 instructors during twelve 120-minute sessions with 20 minutes of daily homework. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary intention-to-treat outcome was acute GAD response (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale score of much or very much improved) after 12 weeks as assessed by trained independent raters. Results: Of 538 participants who provided consent and were evaluated, 226 (mean [SD] age, 33.4 [13.5] years; 158 [69.9%] female) with a primary diagnosis of GAD were included in the trial. A total of 155 participants (68.6%) completed the posttreatment assessment. Completion rates did not differ (Kundalini yoga, 60 [64.5%]; CBT, 67 [74.4%]; and stress education, 28 [65.1%]: χ2 = 2.39, df = 2, P = .30). Response rates were higher in the Kundalini yoga group (54.2%) than in the stress education group (33.%) (odds ratio [OR], 2.46 [95% CI, 1.12-5.42]; P = .03; number needed to treat, 4.59 [95% CI, 2.52-46.19]) and in the CBT group (70.8%) compared with the stress education group (33.0%) (OR, 5.00 [95% CI, 2.12-11.82]; P < .001; number needed to treat, 2.62 [95% CI, 1.91-5.68]). However, the noninferiority test did not find Kundalini yoga to be as effective as CBT (difference, 16.6%; P = .42 for noninferiority). Conclusions and Relevance: In this trial, Kundalini yoga was efficacious for GAD, but the results support CBT remaining first-line treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01912287.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Education as Topic , Yoga , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Single-Blind Method , Stress, Psychological/therapy , Young Adult
5.
Mindfulness (N Y) ; 10(5): 903-912, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31360261

ABSTRACT

Anxiety and depressive symptoms are associated with lower levels of mindfulness, yet few studies to date have examined facets of mindfulness in adults with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD). In this study, we examined differences in mindfulness between individuals with GAD with and without concurrent Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and/or Dysthymic Disorder (DD). We also examined the associations of anxiety and depressive symptoms with facets (subscales) of mindfulness. We hypothesized that individuals with primary GAD and co-occurring MDD/DD would exhibit lower mindfulness than those without a concurrent depressive disorder. We also hypothesized that mindfulness would be negatively correlated with worry and depressive symptom severity. Subjects were 140 adults (M (SD) age = 33.4 (12.9); 73% female) with a primary diagnosis of GAD; 30.8% (n = 43) also met criteria for current MDD/DD as determined by a structured clinical interview for DSM-IV. Current worry and depressive symptoms were assessed using self-report measures at baseline of a 12-week treatment study. Individuals with GAD and co-occurring MDD/DD exhibited significantly lower mindfulness than those without a depressive disorder diagnosis and specifically lower scores on the Awareness sub-scale compared to individuals with primary GAD and no comorbid depression. In terms of the dimensional impact of worry and depression ratings, depression symptoms independently predicted lower Awareness scores and worry independently predicted lower levels of Nonreacting and Nonjudging sub-scales. This may have direct treatment implications.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL