Clinical benefits of retrograde bladder filling method prior to catheter removal after TURP for BPH: A prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate possible benefits and clinical feasibility of retrograde bladder filling method prior to intra-vesical catheter removal after transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male patients undergoing TURP for BPH from January 2019 to October 2019 were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into either retrograde filling (RF) or spontaneous voiding (SV) methods at a single institution to determine safety and efficacy of RF (NCT04309032), with surgeons blinded to allocation. Perioperative outcomes including postoperative complications were compared between two groups. Clinician/patients' satisfaction level which was evaluated with postoperative questionnaires were also compared. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients were randomized into two groups and 56 were included in final analysis (28 men in RF group, 26 in SV group). No significant differences in baseline characteristics including age, prostate volume, or perioperative uroflowmetry were observed. However, RF significantly facilitated time to void (67.0±63.2 vs. 144.0±78.7 min; p<0.001) and time to discharge (168.4±57.2 vs. 218.9±106.9 min; p=0.046). Immediate postoperative complications were comparable in both methods with no significant difference. Overall patient and medical staff satisfaction showed tolerable and similar response by either procedure. CONCLUSIONS: RF method for intra-vesical catheter removal is a safe and satisfactory method that can facilitate early voiding detection and shorten the time to discharge. Further trials are required to further validate our results.

The association between prostatitis and risk of prostate cancer: a National Health Insurance Database study.

PURPOSE: Inflammation is thought to affect the development of prostate cancer (PCa). By retrospectively investigating the database of the National Health Insurance Service, this study attempted to perform a relevant analysis of patients with prostatitis and PCa. METHODS: Participants were aged ≥ 50 years. Patients diagnosed with prostatitis between 2010 and 2013 and matched controls were followed up until 2019. We selected controls with matched propensity scores for age, diabetes, hypertension, and the Charlson comorbidity index. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to determine the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the association between prostatitis and PCa. The HR for PCa according to the presence of prostatitis was classified as acute, chronic, or other prostatitis. RESULTS: A total of 746,176 patients from each group were analyzed. The incidence of PCa was significantly higher in the group with prostatitis (1.8% vs 0.6%, p < 0.001). The HR for PCa was significantly higher in patients with prostatitis (HR 2.99; 95% CI 2.89-3.09, p < 0.001). The HR for PCa was significantly higher in acute prostatitis than in chronic prostatitis (3.82; 95% CI 3.58-4.08; p < 0.001; HR 2.77; 95% CI 2.67-2.87, p < 0.001). The incidence of all-cause death in patients diagnosed PCa was significantly lower in prostatitis group (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.53-0.63, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Prostatitis is associated with an increased incidence of PCa. Acute prostatitis is associated with higher risk of PCa than chronic prostatitis. Clinicians should inform patients with prostatitis that they may have an increased risk of diagnosing PCa, and follow-up is needed.

The tumor volume after radical prostatectomy and its clinical impact on the prognosis of patients with localized prostate cancer.

We evaluated the contribution of tumor volume (TV) to localized prostate cancer (PCa) patients' prognosis. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 2394 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized PCa. The effect of TV and tumor prostate ratio (TV/PV) on PCa patients' prognosis was analyzed through Kaplan-Meier and Cox-proportional analysis. The mean prostate volume for all patients was 36.5 ± 15.4 cc, and the mean TV was 5.9 ± 8.3 cc. A significant positive relationship was observed between the classification by risk group in D' Amico risk classification and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk group (P < 0.001). The high TV showed significantly worse pathologic outcomes than the low TV in terms of high rates of extra-capsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and positive surgical margin (P < 0.05). The patients with high TV and TV/PV had significantly shorter biochemical recurrence-free survivals than those with low TV and TV/PV (P < 0.001). Finally, based on multivariate Cox-proportional analyses, TV and TV/PV was an independent predictor to predict shorter biochemical recurrence-free survival as both a TV (HR: 1.04, 95% CI 1.04-1.05, P < 0.001) and TV/PV (HR: 1.42, 95% CI 1.13-1.78, P = 0.003). TV was revealed to be an independent prognostic factor in the postoperative biochemical recurrence. Patients with a high number of positive core and longer tumor length were significantly related to higher TV.

Effects of age and comorbidity on survival vary according to risk grouping among patients with prostate cancer treated using radical prostatectomy: A retrospective competing-risk analysis from the K-CaP registry.

A multicenter Korean Prostate Cancer Database (K-CaP) has been established to provide information regarding Korean patients with prostate cancer (PCa). We used the K-CaP registry to investigate the value of age and comorbidity for predicting cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) according to risk grouping.The K-CaP registry includes 2253 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) between May 2001 and April 2013 at 5 institutions. Preoperative clinicopathologic data were collected and stratified according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk criteria. Survival was evaluated using Gray's modified log-rank test according to risk category, age (<70 years vs ≥70 years), and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (0 vs ≥1).The median follow-up was 55.0 months (interquartile range: 42.0-70.0 months). Competing-risk regression analysis revealed that, independent of CCI, ≥70-year-old high-risk patients had significantly greater CSM than <70-year-old high-risk patients (P = .019). However, <70-year-old high-risk patients with a CCI of ≥1 had similar CSM relative to ≥70-year-old patients. Survival was not affected by age or CCI among low-risk or intermediate-risk patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that a CCI of ≥1 was independently associated with a higher risk of CSM (P = .003), while an age of ≥70 years was independently associated with a higher risk of OCM (P = .005).Age and comorbidity were associated with survival after RP among patients with high-risk PCa, although these associations were not observed among low-risk or intermediate-risk patients. Therefore, older patients with high-risk diseases and greater comorbidity may require alternative multidisciplinary treatment.

Re-stratification of Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer According to the NCCN Guidelines among Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy: An Analysis Based on the K-CaP Registry.

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to re-stratify patients with high-risk prostate cancer according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines among patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study used the Korean Prostate Cancer Database registry and identified 1,060 patients with high-risk prostate cancer who underwent RP between May 2001 and April 2013. All patients were categorized into risk groups, and subgroups were identified according to the type and number of high-risk factors. RESULTS: Of the 1,060 high-risk patients, 599 (56.5%), 408 (38.5%), and 53 (5.0%) had 1, 2, and 3 risk factors, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the Gleason score, percentage of positive biopsy cores, and number of risk factors present were identified as independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. There were significant differences in the 5-year postoperative biochemical failure-free survival (BCFFS) rate among the different high-risk factor subgroups (log-rank p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the BCFFS rate between the subgroup of high-risk patients with a prostate-specific antigen level > 20 ng/mL alone and the intermediate-risk group with all factors (log-rank p=0.919 and p=0.781, respectively). Additionally, no significant difference was noted in the BCFFS rate between high-risk patients having all factors and those in the very-high-risk group (p=0.566). CONCLUSION: We successfully re-stratified patients with high-risk prostate cancer and identified the combinations of high-risk criteria that will help in the selection of patients for RP.

Favorable Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer Shows Comparable Outcomes With Gleason 3 + 3 Prostate Cancer: Implications for the Expansion of Selection Criteria for Active Surveillance.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the feasibility of active surveillance (AS) in biopsy Gleason score (GS) 3 + 4 prostate cancer (PCa), we compared the outcomes of biopsy GS 3 + 3 and 3 + 4 PCa after radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the data of 1491 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for biopsy GS 3 + 3 or 3 + 4 PCa who fulfilled the low-risk criteria of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines regardless of GS. The favorable GS 3 + 4 group was defined as having core involvement ≤ 50%, prostate-specific antigen density ≤ 0.2 ng/mL/cm3, and number of positive cores ≤ 2 (maximal 1 core of GS 3 + 4). RESULTS: The GS 3 + 4 group showed significantly worse pathologic outcomes, including pathologic GS, pathologic stage, and seminal vesicle invasion rate (all P < .001), as well as worse biochemical recurrence-free survival (P < .001) than the GS 3 + 3 group. However, the favorable GS 3 + 4 subgroup showed no significant differences in the pathologic outcomes (all P > .05) and in biochemical recurrence-free survival (P = .817) compared to the GS 3 + 3 group. CONCLUSION: Despite the application of low-risk criteria, GS 3 + 4 PCa patients showed significantly worse outcomes than GS 3 + 3 patients. However, favorable GS 3 + 4 patients showed comparable clinicopathologic outcomes with GS 3 + 3 patients, suggesting possible expansion of AS for the favorable GS 3 + 4 group.

Theracurmin® efficiently inhibits the growth of human prostate and bladder cancer cells via induction of apoptotic cell death and cell cycle arrest.

In the present study, we aimed to investigate the anticancer properties of Theracurmin®, a novel form of the yellow curry pigment curcumin, as well as explore the molecular mechanisms of the potential anticancer effects of Theracurmin® on human prostate cancer and bladder cancer cells in vitro. The proliferation of cancer cells was examined by using the Cell Counting Kit-8. The clonogenic growth potential was determined by clonogenic assay. Cell cycle distribution was evaluated by flow cytometry using propidium iodide staining. Western blot analysis was applied to explore the expression patterns of molecules associated with apoptotic cell death and cell cycle checkpoint. We noted that Theracurmin® and curcumin exhibited similar anticancer effects in both androgen-dependent and -independent human prostate cancer cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner. These agents reduced cell viability and clonogenic growth potential by inducing apoptosis and cell cycle disturbance in human prostate cancer cells. Theracurmin® and curcumin also exerted marked anticancer effects on human bladder cancer cells, even in cisplatin-resistant T24R2 cells, in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Moreover, Theracurmin® and curcumin treatment decreased cell viability and clonogenicity via induction of apoptotic cell death and cell cycle dysregulation in human bladder cancer cells. In conclusion, our study suggests that Theracurmin® has potential as an anticancer agent in complementary and alternative medicine for these urological cancers.

Stratification of Contemporary Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for High-risk Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: Published data have shown heterogeneous outcomes for high-risk prostate cancer. Thus, we tried to identify more precise risk stratification system for contemporary high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: Classifying patients according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk groups, we reviewed data of 1,905 men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) at our institution from 2006 to 2013. For our analyses, high-risk prostate cancers meeting at least one of two following factors were categorized as unfavorable high-risk prostate cancer: biopsy primary Gleason pattern 5 and/or multiple (≥2) high-risk criteria present. All other men with high-risk prostate cancer were designated as having favorable high-risk disease. Postoperative outcomes, including biochemical recurrence-free survivals were assessed and compared via log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: In multivariable analysis, primary Gleason 5 pattern on biopsy (p = 0.008) and multiple (≥2) high-risk criteria (p < 0.001) were observed to be independent predictors of the risk of biochemical recurrence amongst high-risk group undergoing RP. Favorable high-risk prostate cancer group showed a significantly higher 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival than unfavorable high-risk group (56.35 vs. 18.75 %; log-rank test: p < 0.001). Favorable high-risk group demonstrated significantly lower 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival than intermediate-risk group (56.07 vs. 82.05 %; log-rank test: p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A significant heterogeneity existed in biochemical outcomes of contemporary patients with high-risk prostate cancer who underwent definitive RP. According to primary Gleason pattern and number of high-risk criteria present, high-risk group should be stratified further into favorable and unfavorable disease.

Stratification of patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To identify an appropriate risk stratification system for intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the data on 1559 patients who were treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) at our institution between 2005 and 2013 and classified them according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk groups. For our analyses, intermediate-risk PCa was designated as unfavourable intermediate-risk PCa if it met at least one of the following two criteria: biopsy Gleason score 4 + 3 and/or presence of ≥ 2 intermediate-risk criteria. All other men with intermediate-risk PCa were designated as having favourable intermediate-risk disease. Postoperative outcomes, including biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, were calculated and compared using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: In multivariable analysis, biopsy Gleason score 4 + 3 and multiple (≥ 2) intermediate-risk criteria were observed to be independent predictors of BCR risk among men in the intermediate-risk group undergoing RP. The favourable intermediate-risk group had a significantly higher 5-year BCR-free survival compared with the unfavourable intermediate-risk group (87.5 vs 66.5%; P < 0.001). The unfavourable intermediate-risk group had significantly higher 5-year BCR-free survival than the high-risk group (66.5 vs 47.9%; P < 0.001) while the favourable intermediate-risk group had significantly lower 5-year BCR-free survival than the low-risk group (87.5 vs 93.5%; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: A marked heterogeneity exists in the biochemical outcomes of contemporary patients with intermediate-risk PCa who undergo definitive RP. According to biopsy Gleason score and number of intermediate-risk criteria present, the intermediate-risk group should be sub-divided into those with favourable and unfavourable intermediate-risk disease.

Effect of intraprostatic local anesthesia during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: comparison of 3 methods in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the effect of intracapsular anesthesia and periprostatic nerve block during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study 152 consecutive patients were randomized into 3 groups. Group 1 of 41 patients was administered intraprostatic local anesthesia into the right and left sides with a total of 2 ml 1% lidocaine and a periprostatic injection of 2 ml saline later. Group 2 of 49 patients was administered intraprostatic injection of 2 ml saline, followed by periprostatic local anesthesia with 2 ml 1% lidocaine. Group 3 of 62 patients received intraprostatic and periprostatic local anesthesia with 2 ml 1% lidocaine. Patients were asked to grade the pain level using a 10-point linear visual analog pain scale 1) when the transrectal ultrasound probe was inserted, 2) during anesthesia, 3) during biopsy and 4) 20 minutes after biopsy. One-way ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test with the Tukey post hoc test were used to compare patient characteristics and pain scale responses among the 3 groups. RESULTS: No major complications, including sepsis and severe rectal bleeding, were noted in any patient. There were statistically significant differences in pain scores among groups 1 to 3 during anesthesia (mean +/- SD 5.6 +/- 2.5, 6.7 +/- 2.3 and 4.9 +/- 2.1, p = 0.003) and during biopsy (4.3 +/- 2.7, 4.5 +/- 2.6 and 2.7 +/- 2.1, respectively, p = 0.032). There were no differences in pain scores among the 3 groups during probe insertion (p = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: A combination of intracapsular anesthesia and periprostatic nerve block is an effective and useful technique that is well tolerated by the patient. It decreases the level of pain and discomfort associated with the prostatic biopsy procedure.

Adjuvant interleukin-2, interferon-alpha, and 5-fluorouracil immunochemotherapy after radical nephrectomy for locally advanced renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon-alpha, and 5-fluorouracil combination immunochemotherapy as adjuvant therapy after radical nephrectomy for nonmetastatic pathologic Stage T3 renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: Thirty patients who underwent radical nephrectomy for pT3N0M0 renal cell carcinoma at our department from June 1999 to December 2003 were studied retrospectively. Of the 30 patients, 9 (adjuvant group) also received adjuvant interleukin-2, interferon-alpha, and 5-fluorouracil immunochemotherapy after surgery; the other 21 (nonadjuvant group) did not. A comparative analysis of the two groups was performed with respect to disease-free and overall survival. Side effects from immunochemotherapy were also assessed. RESULTS: The adjuvant therapy and nonadjuvant therapy groups were not significantly different with respect to age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, pathologic subtype, pathologic stage, tumor size, and Fuhrman's grade. The two groups demonstrated a significant difference in the time to progression (log-rank test, P = 0.011). Although 3 patients had died at a mean follow-up of 23.8 months (range 7.5 to 35) in the nonadjuvant group, apparent differences between the two groups in overall survival were not statistically significant (log-rank test, P = 0.2487). Combination immunochemotherapy was mostly well tolerated, and all side effects were limited to World Health Organization grades 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the ongoing controversy surrounding its effectiveness in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, the results of our preliminary study suggest that interleukin-2, interferon-alpha, 5-fluorouracil combination immunochemotherapy may be effective as adjuvant therapy after complete resection of pT3N0M0 renal cell carcinoma.