Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Cancer Sci ; 111(8): 2974-2986, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32539207

ABSTRACT

Many studies have reported a positive association between lower socioeconomic status (SES) and higher head and neck cancer (HNC) risk. Fewer studies have examined the impact of SES on the association between alcohol or cigarette use and HNC risk. The current case-control study (1104 HNC cases and 1363 controls) investigated the influence of education, a SES indicator, on the association between HNC and the use of alcohol, cigarettes, or betel quids in Taiwan, a country with universal health care. Our results showed a larger increase in HNC risk associated with alcohol among those with lower educational level (odds ratio [OR] = 2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53-2.80) than those with higher educational level (OR = 1.38; 95% CI, 1.04-1.85) (heterogeneity-P = .03). Educational level had an influence on the association between alcohol use and HNC risk among those with genetic susceptibility (ALDH2-deficient) to the carcinogenic effect of alcohol. The association between cigarette or betel quid use and HNC risk was similar between the high and low educational groups. National policies and social interventions have led to the decline in the prevalence of cigarette and betel quid users in Taiwan. In contrast, due to the lack of adequate alcohol control policies, alcohol consumption in Taiwan has continued to rise. A higher impact of alcohol on HNC risk among lower SES individuals even with universal health care could be the result of insufficient alcohol control policies in Taiwan.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/epidemiology , Health Status Disparities , Life Style , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/epidemiology , Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Aldehyde Dehydrogenase, Mitochondrial/deficiency , Aldehyde Dehydrogenase, Mitochondrial/genetics , Calcium Compounds/administration & dosage , Calcium Compounds/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Educational Status , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Head and Neck Neoplasms/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oxides/administration & dosage , Oxides/adverse effects , Piper/adverse effects , Plant Extracts/administration & dosage , Plant Extracts/adverse effects , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/epidemiology , Social Class , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Taiwan/epidemiology , Universal Health Care
2.
Head Neck ; 41(7): 2285-2290, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30758100

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Frey syndrome is a common complication after parotidectomy. This study aimed to investigate the potential predictors for developing severe Frey syndrome after parotidectomy and to identify patients who may benefit from additional preventive maneuvers. METHODS: A total of 485 patients received parotidectomy because of parotid tumors at the Otolaryngology Department of the National Cheng Kung University Hospital, from July 2009 to November 2015. Only 115 of 485 patients were included in this study and to fill in a questionnaire to determine the occurrence and severity of Frey syndrome. RESULTS: A total of 115 parotidectomies were identified. 84 (73%, 84/115) patients were aware of the discomfort and were thus considered symptomatic. 39 (34%, 39/115) patients considered the symptoms apparently affected their quality of life. MSI tests showed that 56 (49%, 56/115) patients had a positive MSI test. By combining the results from symptom questionnaire and MSI test, 23 patients (20%, 23/115) had a severe form of Frey syndrome. Among all clinicopathological variables, the resected specimen size was the only significant predictor of the severe Frey syndrome group (P = 0.04). Disease pathology, tumor size, and adjuvant radiotherapy did not correlate with the severe Frey syndrome. Using receiver operating curve analysis, the best cutoff value of the resected specimen size (in largest dimension) for predicting severe Frey syndrome was 40 mm(sensitivity: 71.7%, specificity: 42.0%; area under the curve = 0.6483). The odds ratio of severe Frey syndrome with every 10 mm increase in the largest diameter of resected specimen was 1.30 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.68; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Resected specimen size is the only significant predictor of developing severe Frey syndrome after parotidectomy. Preventive interventions may have to be considered in high-risk patients whose resected specimen size (in largest dimension) is greater than 40 mm.


Subject(s)
Parotid Gland/surgery , Parotid Neoplasms/pathology , Parotid Neoplasms/surgery , Severity of Illness Index , Sweating, Gustatory/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Quality of Life , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tumor Burden , Young Adult
3.
PLoS One ; 9(5): e96507, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24796481

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The current study evaluated the association between tea consumption and head and neck cancer (HNC) in Taiwan, where tea is a major agricultural product and a popular beverage. METHODS: Interviews regarding tea consumption (frequency, duration, and types) were conducted with 396 HNC cases and 413 controls. Unconditional logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of HNC risk associated with tea drinking, adjusted for sex, age, education, cigarette smoking, betel quid chewing, and alcohol drinking. RESULTS: A reduced HNC risk associated with tea drinking (OR for every cup per day = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99; OR for ≧5 cups per day = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.39-0.94) was observed. The association was especially significant for pharyngeal cancer (OR for every cup per day = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.88-0.98; OR for ≧5 cups per day = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.16-0.66). A significant inverse association between HNC and tea consumption was observed particularly for green tea. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that tea drinking may reduce the risk of HNC. The anticancer property of tea, if proven, may offer a natural chemopreventive measure to reduce the occurrence of HNC.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/therapeutic use , Head and Neck Neoplasms/prevention & control , Tea , Chemoprevention , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/epidemiology , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Risk Assessment , Taiwan/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL