Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Neurol ; 88(6): 1178-1193, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32951262

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Current understanding of the neuromodulatory effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on large-scale brain networks remains elusive, largely due to the lack of techniques that can reveal DBS-induced activity at the whole-brain level. Using a novel 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-compatible stimulator, we investigated whole-brain effects of subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation in patients with Parkinson disease. METHODS: Fourteen patients received STN-DBS treatment and participated in a block-design functional MRI (fMRI) experiment, wherein stimulations were delivered during "ON" blocks interleaved with "OFF" blocks. fMRI responses to low-frequency (60Hz) and high-frequency(130Hz) STN-DBS were measured 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postsurgery. To ensure reliability, multiple runs (48 minutes) of fMRI data were acquired at each postsurgical visit. Presurgical resting-state fMRI (30 minutes) data were also acquired. RESULTS: Two neurocircuits showed highly replicable, but distinct responses to STN-DBS. A circuit involving the globus pallidus internus (GPi), thalamus, and deep cerebellar nuclei was significantly activated, whereas another circuit involving the primary motor cortex (M1), putamen, and cerebellum showed DBS-induced deactivation. These 2 circuits were dissociable in terms of their DBS-induced responses and resting-state functional connectivity. The GPi circuit was frequency-dependent, selectively responding to high-frequency stimulation, whereas the M1 circuit was responsive in a time-dependent manner, showing enhanced deactivation over time. Finally, activation of the GPi circuit was associated with overall motor improvement, whereas M1 circuit deactivation was related to reduced bradykinesia. INTERPRETATION: Concurrent DBS-fMRI using 3T revealed 2 distinct circuits that responded differentially to STN-DBS and were related to divergent symptoms, a finding that may provide novel insights into the neural mechanisms underlying DBS. ANN NEUROL 2020;88:1178-1193.


Subject(s)
Cerebellar Nuclei/physiology , Cerebellum/physiology , Globus Pallidus/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Putamen/physiology , Thalamus/physiology , Deep Brain Stimulation , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Neural Pathways/physiology , Subthalamic Nucleus/physiology
2.
Brain Stimul ; 12(4): 911-921, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30803865

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Brainstem-focused mechanisms supporting transcutaneous auricular VNS (taVNS) effects are not well understood, particularly in humans. We employed ultrahigh field (7T) fMRI and evaluated the influence of respiratory phase for optimal targeting, applying our respiratory-gated auricular vagal afferent nerve stimulation (RAVANS) technique. HYPOTHESIS: We proposed that targeting of nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS) and cardiovagal modulation in response to taVNS stimuli would be enhanced when stimulation is delivered during a more receptive state, i.e. exhalation. METHODS: Brainstem fMRI response to auricular taVNS (cymba conchae) was assessed for stimulation delivered during exhalation (eRAVANS) or inhalation (iRAVANS), while exhalation-gated stimulation over the greater auricular nerve (GANctrl, i.e. earlobe) was included as control. Furthermore, we evaluated cardiovagal response to stimulation by calculating instantaneous HF-HRV from cardiac data recorded during fMRI. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrated that eRAVANS evoked fMRI signal increase in ipsilateral pontomedullary junction in a cluster including purported NTS. Brainstem response to GANctrl localized a partially-overlapping cluster, more ventrolateral, consistent with spinal trigeminal nucleus. A region-of-interest analysis also found eRAVANS activation in monoaminergic source nuclei including locus coeruleus (LC, noradrenergic) and both dorsal and median raphe (serotonergic) nuclei. Response to eRAVANS was significantly greater than iRAVANS for all nuclei, and greater than GANctrl in LC and raphe nuclei. Furthermore, eRAVANS, but not iRAVANS, enhanced cardiovagal modulation, confirming enhanced eRAVANS response on both central and peripheral neurophysiological levels. CONCLUSION: 7T fMRI localized brainstem response to taVNS, linked such response with autonomic outflow, and demonstrated that taVNS applied during exhalation enhanced NTS targeting.


Subject(s)
Brain Stem/physiology , Heart Rate/physiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Respiratory Mechanics/physiology , Vagus Nerve Stimulation/methods , Vagus Nerve/physiology , Adult , Animals , Brain Stem/diagnostic imaging , Electrocardiography/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation/methods , Young Adult
3.
Pain ; 152(7): 1632-1640, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21477924

ABSTRACT

The present study examined whether a moderately aversive abdominal threat would lead to greater enhancement in affect- and pain-related defensive responding as indexed by the acoustic startle reflex (ASR) and nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) in women compared to men. We also predicted sex differences in threat-related autonomic arousal measured by skin conductance responses (SCRs) to acoustic startle and noxious sural nerve stimulation. Unpredictable threat was manipulated by alternating 30-second safe ("no abdominal stimulation will be given") and threat ("abdominal stimulation may occur at anytime") periods. The experiment consisted of 2 blocks, each containing 4 safe and 4 threat periods in which the ASR or NFR was randomly probed 9-21 seconds following period onset. Unpredictable abdominal threat potentiated both ASR and NFR responses compared to periods signaling safety. SCRs to acoustic startle probes and noxious sural nerve stimulation were also significantly elevated during the threat vs safe periods. No sex differences in ASR or startle-evoked SCRs emerged. However, nociceptive responding was moderated by sex; females showed significant increases in NFR magnitudes across both safe and threat periods compared to males. Females also showed greater threat-potentiated SCRs to sural nerve stimulation than males. Our findings indicate that both affect- and pain-related defense and arousal systems are strongly influenced by threat of an aversive, unpredictable event, a situation associated with anticipatory anxiety. Females, compared to males, showed greater nociceptive responding and pain modulation when exposed to an unpredictable threatening context, whereas affect-driven ASR responses showed no such sex differentiation.


Subject(s)
Fear/psychology , Pain/psychology , Reflex, Startle/physiology , Sex Characteristics , Acoustic Stimulation/adverse effects , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Blinking , Electroshock/adverse effects , Female , Galvanic Skin Response/physiology , Humans , Male , Pain Measurement , Reaction Time/physiology , Sural Nerve/physiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL