Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Andrologia ; 47(5): 545-52, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24909239

ABSTRACT

We focussed on evaluating the protective effect of lycopene and resveratrol on post-thaw bull sperm and oxidative stress parameters. Nine ejaculates for each bull were used in the study. Each ejaculate, splitted into three equal aliquots and diluted at 37 °C with base extenders containing lycopene (1 × 10(-3)  g ml(-1) ) and resveratrol (1 mm), and no antioxidant (control), was cooled to 5 °C and then frozen. Frozen straws were thawed in a water bath for evaluation. The supplementation of the semen extender with lycopene and resveratrol increased the percentages of post-thawed computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) motility (55.8 ± 3.8 and 61.9 ± 4.0%) and progressive motility (38 ± 2.4 and 37 ± 8.8), compared with the controls (50.7 ± 2.65 and 33.3 ± 3.74%, respectively, P < 0.05). Resveratrol provided a higher ALH (4.3 ± 0.1), in comparison with the control (3.9 ± 0.3, P < 0.05). The supplementation of the semen extender with lycopene and resveratrol produced a higher mitochondrial activity (24.6 ± 2.9 and 30.1 ± 6.5% respectively), compared with that of the control (11.8 ± 9.5%, P < 0.05). It was determined that both antioxidants resulted in a lower percentage of sperm with damaged DNA than that of the control (P < 0.05). Sperm motion characteristics except for ALH, acrosome integrity, sperm viability and oxidative stress parameters were not affected by the adding of lycopene and resveratrol.


Subject(s)
Antioxidants/pharmacology , Carotenoids/pharmacology , Cryopreservation/methods , DNA/drug effects , Mitochondria/drug effects , Semen Preservation/methods , Sperm Motility/drug effects , Spermatozoa/drug effects , Stilbenes/pharmacology , Acrosome/drug effects , Animals , Cattle , DNA Damage/drug effects , Lycopene , Male , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Resveratrol
2.
Neoplasma ; 60(1): 19-25, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23067212

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to evaluate the tolerability and toxicity of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and to analyze the prognosis in patients with operable gastric cancer. The retrospective analysis included 723 patients with operable gastric cancer; stage IB-IV (M0), received adjuvant CRT from 8 Medical Centers in Turkey between 2003 and 2010. The patients' age, sex, tumor localization, Lauren classification, grade and stage of the disease, type of dissection, the toxicity and tolerability status and survival rate were analyzed. All patients were divided into two groups as tolerable group to adjuvant CRT and intolerable group to adjuvant CRT .Among the patient, 73.9% had stage III-IVM0 disease; 61.0% had the intestinal type of gastric cancer, 51.1% had the distal type, and 61.4% had undergone D2 dissections. The number of patients who completed the entire course of the adjuvant CRT was 545 (75.4%).The median follow-up period was 20.8 months (range: 1.5-107 months). Overall Survival (OS) rates were 80% and 52%, while the relapse free survival (RFS) rates were 75% and 48% at 1 and 3 years, respectively.In the univariate analysis of the groups based on the the age defined as <65 or ≥ 65 (p=0.16 / p=0.003), Lauren classification (p=0.004 / p<0.001), localization of tumor (p=0.02 / p=0.04), tumor grade (p=0.06 / p=0.003), disease stage (p<0.001 / p<0.001), type of dissection (p=0.445 / p=0.043), presence or absence of toxicity (p=0.062 / p=0.077) and tolerability of the therapy (p=0.002 / p=0.001). In the cox regression analysis, tumor stage (Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.332; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.195-0.566; p<0.001), and tolerability (HR: 0.516; 95% CI: 0.305-0.872; p=0.014), were found to be related with the OS. Tumor stage (HR: 0.318; 95% CI: 0.190-0.533; p=<0.001) and tolerability (HR: 0.604; 95% CI: 0.367-0.995; p=0.048) were observed to be statistically significant in terms of the RFS.We have observed that whether a patient can or cannot tolerate adjuvant CRT due to its toxicity is an independent prognostic factor besides the known prognostic factors like tumor stage and Lauren classification. We are of the opinion that the treatment of patients who cannot tolerate adjuvant CRT should be replaced with less toxic adjuvant therapies.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Male , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Radiotherapy Dosage , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Rate , Turkey , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL