Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM
Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
J Arrhythm ; 34(2): 167-175, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29657592

ABSTRACT

Background: The phase III Japanese Rivaroxaban Once-Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (J-ROCKET AF) showed that the rivaroxaban group had a lower event rate of intracranial bleeding than the warfarin group and that rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the principal safety outcome. However, safety and effectiveness data from unselected patients with AF in everyday clinical practice in Japan are lacking. Methods: The Xarelto Post-Authorization Safety & Effectiveness Study in Japanese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (XAPASS) is a real-world, prospective, single-arm, observational study mandated by the Japanese authority as postmarketing surveillance. XAPASS involves patients with nonvalvular AF prescribed rivaroxaban. The principal safety outcome is a composite of major and nonmajor bleeding events, and the primary effectiveness outcome is the incidence of ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, noncentral nervous system systemic embolism, and myocardial infarction. Results: In total, 11 308 patients were enrolled from April 2012 to June 2014. Their age was 73.1 ± 9.9 years, and their CHADS 2 score was 2.2 ± 1.3. Female patients, patients aged ≥75 years, patients with a body weight of ≤50 kg, and patients with a creatinine clearance of <50 mL/min constituted 38.1%, 48.7%, 19.5%, and 23.9% of all patients, respectively. Almost half (53.2%) of patients were prescribed other anticoagulants before starting rivaroxaban. Conclusions: Data from this study will supplement those from the J-ROCKET AF and provide practical information for the optimal use of rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in Japanese patients with AF (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01582737).

2.
J Gastroenterol ; 51(10): 1011-21, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26931117

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib was approved for treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Japan in 2009. A prospective postmarketing all-patient surveillance (PMS) study was requested by Japanese authorities to confirm safety and effectiveness of sorafenib in Japanese HCC population. METHODS: Patients with unresectable HCC treated with sorafenib were followed up for 12 months. Data on patient demographic characteristics, treatment status, clinical outcome, and adverse events (AEs) were collected. RESULTS: This interim analysis included 1109 and 1065 patients evaluable for safety and effectiveness, respectively. Most patients (83.4 %) received the recommended initial dose of 400 mg twice daily. After a follow-up of 12-months, 89.8 % had discontinued treatment, most because of AEs (44.5 %) or progression (33.8 %). The most common drug-related adverse events (DRAE) were hand-foot skin reaction (51.4 %), liver dysfunction (26.4 %), diarrhea (25.1 %), and hypertension (21.6 %). The median overall survival (OS) was 348 days [95 % confidence interval (CI) 299-389 days], and the median duration of treatment was 87 days (95 % CI 78-98 days). Multivariate analyses identified baseline prognostic factors for longer OS, including female sex, low Child-Pugh score, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, tumor stage I/II/III, low aspartate aminotransferase level, high hemoglobin level, hepatitis C and history of surgical resection. CONCLUSIONS: In general, the safety and effectiveness findings in this PMS were consistent with findings from previous clinical studies. Sorafenib was well tolerated and clinically useful for Japanese patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01411436.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Phenylurea Compounds/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury/etiology , Child , Diarrhea/chemically induced , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hand-Foot Syndrome/etiology , Humans , Hypertension/chemically induced , Japan , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Niacinamide/adverse effects , Niacinamide/therapeutic use , Patient Acuity , Phenylurea Compounds/adverse effects , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing , Prospective Studies , Sex Factors , Sorafenib , Survival Rate , Withholding Treatment , Young Adult
3.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 45(10): 953-62, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26206897

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Real-life safety and efficacy of sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma in a nationwide patient population were evaluated by post-marketing all-patient surveillance. METHODS: All patients with unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Japan who started sorafenib therapy from February 2008 to September 2009 were registered and followed for up to 12 months. Baseline characteristics, treatment status, tumor response, survival and safety data were recorded by the prescribing physicians. RESULTS: Safety and efficacy were evaluated in 3255 and 3171 patients, respectively. The initial daily dose was 800 mg in 78.2% of patients. Median duration of treatment was 6.7 months and the mean relative dose intensity was 68.4%. Overall, 2227 patients (68.4%) discontinued the treatment by 12 months, half of which (52.0% of discontinued patients) were due to adverse events. The most common adverse drug reactions were hand-foot skin reaction (59%), hypertension (36%), rash (25%) and increase in lipase/amylase (23%). The median progression-free survival was 7.3 months (95% confidence intervals: 6.7-8.1), and the overall survival rate at 1 year was 75.4% (73.5-77.1). Prognostic factors for overall survival were mostly consistent with those in previous clinical trials in the univariate analysis and largely similar to those for progression-free survival and duration of treatment in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma under the labeled dose was feasible in daily medical practice, for its acceptable toxicity profile and favorable clinical benefit that were consistent with those in clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Phenylurea Compounds/therapeutic use , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Disease-Free Survival , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Female , Humans , Japan , Kidney Neoplasms/secondary , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Niacinamide/adverse effects , Niacinamide/therapeutic use , Phenylurea Compounds/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Sorafenib , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL