Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters

Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM
Database
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Intern Med ; 62(13): 1921-1929, 2023 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36384899

ABSTRACT

Objective Third-generation cephalosporins (3GCs) may be susceptible in vitro to Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella aerogenes. However, treatment with mainly fourth-generation cephalosporins or carbapenems is currently recommended. Diversification of antimicrobial agents in therapy is required to avoid the selection pressure of resistant organisms by broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. This study investigated the clinical efficacy of 3GC therapy for Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella aerogenes bacteremia in a multicenter, retrospective, observational study. Methods Patients with Enterobacter spp. or Klebsiella aerogenes detected in blood cultures and treated with a susceptible antimicrobial agent were included in the study. Propensity score matching was performed to align patient background bases, and clinical outcomes between the 3GC and non-3GC groups were compared. Treatment success was defined as having no need for treatment escalation or the addition of other antimicrobial agents, no recurrence, or no death within 30 days. Results The study included 188 cases, of which 57 and 131 were included in the 3GC and non-3GC treatment groups, respectively; 53 patients in each group were matched by propensity score matching. There were no significant differences between groups in rates of switching to a susceptible antimicrobial or adding another agent, relapse within 30 days, or death within 30 days. In the 3GC group, source control was associated with favorable clinical outcomes. Conclusion Definitive 3GC therapy for susceptible Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella aerogenes bacteremia is as clinically effective and valuable a targeted therapy as non-3GC therapy and can be implemented under conditions in which infection source control measures are in place.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Enterobacter aerogenes , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Enterobacter , Cephalosporins/pharmacology , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , beta-Lactamases
2.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 202(4): W400-7, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24660739

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using the ultrasound contrast agent Sonazoid (perflubutane) with unenhanced ultrasound and supplementary contrast-enhanced MRI in the differential diagnosis (benign vs malignant) of focal breast lesions. The safety of Sonazoid was also assessed in this study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 127 patients with focal breast lesions were enrolled in this study at five centers in Japan. Three reviewers who were blinded to the patient characteristics independently assessed the ultrasound images and MR images in a randomized sequence. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of CEUS, unenhanced ultrasound, and supplementary contrast-enhanced MRI for the differential diagnosis were compared using generalized estimating equation analyses. Diagnostic confidence was also assessed. RESULTS: The accuracy of CEUS was significantly higher than that of unenhanced ultrasound (87.2% vs 65.5%, respectively; p < 0.001). In addition, CEUS showed significantly higher specificity, although the improvement in sensitivity was not statistically significant. The accuracy and specificity were significantly higher with CEUS than with contrast-enhanced MRI, but the improvement in sensitivity was not statistically significant. The area under the curve in a receiver operating characteristic analysis was significantly greater with CEUS than with unenhanced ultrasound. The incidence of adverse events was 11.4% and the incidence of adverse drug reactions was 3.3%. All adverse drug reactions were mild. CONCLUSION: CEUS using Sonazoid was confirmed to be superior to unenhanced ultrasound for the differential diagnosis (benign vs malignant) of focal breast lesions in terms of diagnostic accuracy with no serious adverse reactions.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Contrast Media , Ferric Compounds , Iron , Oxides , Ultrasonography, Mammary , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Gadolinium DTPA , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Meglumine , Middle Aged , Organometallic Compounds , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 33(7): 941-4, 2006 Jul.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16835484

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The uracil/tegafur (UFT) plus oral Leucovorin (LV) regimen is one of the standard chemotherapy modalities for colorectal cancer, and has been reported to have fewer side effects. In this study, we investigated the efficacy and toxicity of UFT/LV regimen in elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The subjects were twelve patients older than 70 years (median age, 76 years), who received a UFT/LV regimen for colorectal cancer between January 2004 and June 2005. Chemotherapy was attempted for metastatic colorectal cancer in seven patients and for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in five patients. The response rate and toxicity were compared with those of patients younger than 70 years old. RESULTS: Four courses of chemotherapy, in median, were delivered. The regimen consisting of UFT 300 mg/m(2) was completed in all patients. One patient achieved a complete response and another patient a partial response, thus resulting in an overall response rate of 28.6%. Three patients experienced Grade 1 diarrhea, and seven patients had Grade 1 or 2 anemia. Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was not recognized in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with UFT/LV regimen is effective and well tolerated in elderly as well as younger patients.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anorexia/chemically induced , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Combined Modality Therapy , Diarrhea/chemically induced , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Remission Induction , Tegafur/administration & dosage , Uracil/administration & dosage
4.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 32(13): 2129-31, 2005 Dec.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16352943

ABSTRACT

The patient was a 78-year-old woman who underwent right hemicolectomy with lymph node dissection (D 2) for cecal cancer in June 2003. Histological diagnosis was moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, ss, n(-), P 0, H 0, M (-), stage II. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not conducted, and the patient was periodically observed after operation. In April 2004, the serum CEA level was elevated to 14.9 ng/ml. Abdominal CT examinations revealed a tumor, 50 x 35 x 50 mm in size, on the right iliopsoas muscle close to the anastomotic site. Systemic chemotherapy with UFT + Leucovorin was initiated under the diagnosis of local recurrence. Only grade 1 body weight loss,pigmentation, pruritus, and anorexia were recognized during chemotherapy. However, these complications did not require administration. After completion of 6 courses of this chemotherapeutic regimen,the serum CEA level was normalized at 3.1 ng/ml, and CT scan revealed the tumor had disappeared in November 2004. Currently, the patient is free from any signs of recurrence and has maintained a complete remission (CR).


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Colectomy , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Combined Modality Therapy , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Lymph Node Excision , Remission Induction , Tegafur/administration & dosage , Uracil/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL