Prevalence of abnormal urine drug tests during COVID-19 pandemic in the cancer patient population: retrospective study.

Background: Opioid misuse is a persistent concern, heightened by the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines the risk factors contributing to elevated rates of abnormal urine drug tests (UDTs) in the cancer pain patient population during COVID-19. Materials & methods: A retrospective chart review of 500 patient encounters involving UDTs at a comprehensive cancer center. Results: Medication adherence rates increase when UDTs are incorporated into a chronic cancer pain management protocol. Higher positive tests for illicit or nonprescribed substances in patients with specific risk factors: current smokers (tobacco), no active cancer and concurrent benzodiazepine use. Conclusion: This research emphasizes the increased risk of opioid misuse during COVID-19 among cancer pain patients with specific risk factors outlined in the results.

This study looked at how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected opioid use among people with cancer-related pain. The researchers checked the records of 500 patients who had had tests to see if they used opioids correctly. They found that when these tests were part of the treatment plan, patients were more likely to take their medicines correctly. However, they also noticed that certain patients, such as those who smoke, do not have active cancer or are taking another type of medication (i.e., benzodiazepines), are more likely to use opioids or other drugs in ways that deviated from the original intention. This study shows that during the pandemic, which continues to exist, it is even more important to watch how these patients use their painkillers and help them avoid misuse.

Use of Temporary Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in an Oncologic Population: A Retrospective Review.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with an underlying cancer diagnosis may experience pain from many sources. Temporary, percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a minimally invasive procedure that can control pain in those who have failed conservative management. The purpose of this retrospective review is to show the use of PNS in managing pain in the oncologic setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Temporary, percutaneous PNS was placed under fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance for 15 patients at a cancer pain facility. Cases were grouped by subtypes of cancer pain (ie, tumor-related, treatment-related, cancer-associated conditions, and cancer-independent). Before PNS, patients were refractory to medical management or previous interventional treatments. Patients were observed with routine clinic visits to monitor pain levels via visual analog scale (VAS) and quality-of-life measures. PNS was removed after the indicated 60-day treatment period. RESULTS: This retrospective review presents ten successful cases of oncologic-related pain treated with PNS. Patients with subtypes of pain that were tumor related, from cancer-associated conditions, and cancer independent all experienced a similar degree of pain relief. However, patients with cancer-treatment-related pain experienced the least analgesia from PNS. We also present six cases in which PNS did not provide adequate pain relief. CONCLUSION: PNS is an emerging technology in neuromodulation that may be useful in managing pain, especially in the oncologic population. Patients with cancer-related and non-cancer-related pain localized to a specific nerve distribution should be considered appropriate candidates for PNS. Further research is needed to optimize patient selection and indications for PNS in the population with cancer.

Trends of opioid prescription in cancer patients utilizing telemedicine: a retrospective study.

Aim: Prescribing patterns among healthcare practitioners remain a recurring theme of interest in the opioid crisis. This study aims to provide insight on opioid prescribing patterns for cancer pain in telemedicine and in-person encounters during COVID-19. Materials & methods: A retrospective chart review of 1000 encounters (500 telemedicine and 500 in-person) at an academic tertiary care comprehensive cancer center. Results: On average, overall, significantly higher narcotics (in morphine milligram equivalents [MME]) prescribed for patients receiving telemedicine services. In-person encounters had a significantly higher proportion of narcotic (in MME) increases in subsequent visits. Conclusion: Our institution continues to adapt telehealth services as an additional care venue and deeper insight helps mitigate development of maladaptive opioid prescribing patterns.

Multidisciplinary chronic pain management strategies in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndromes.

Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) are a group of disorders characterized by abnormal connective tissue affecting several organ systems. Patients with the hypermobile type of EDS (hEDS) commonly experience chronic pain which can present as musculoskeletal pain, fibromyalgia, neuropathic pain or abdominal pain. The effective management of chronic pain in hEDS patients is a challenge. This study reviews two cases of chronic pain in hEDS patients and the multimodal treatment regimen used along with peripheral nerve stimulation for shoulder and knee pains, never before reported in hEDS patients. Since hEDS associated chronic pain is multifactorial in origin, treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach which includes physical therapy, psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and interventional pain procedures such as trigger point injections, peripheral nerve block, radiofrequency ablation and peripheral nerve stimulation.

Ehlers­Danlos Syndromes (EDS) are a group of disorders that affects the connective tissues that supports skin, muscles and organs. Patients with the hypermobile subtype of EDS (hEDS) often experience chronic pain of multiple locations including the muscles, joints, nerves, abdomen, head or generalized pain. Treating chronic pain in patients with hEDS is challenging. In this study, we review the treatment of chronic pain in two patients with hEDS using multiple therapies including the novel use of peripheral nerve stimulation in this patient population. Chronic pain in hEDS patients is caused by multiple different mechanisms and therefore, the treatment of this pain requires multiple different therapeutic interventions such as medications, physical therapy, psychotherapy and minimally invasive procedures such as peripheral nerve stimulation.

Case report: use of high-intensity laser therapy for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.

Trigeminal neuralgia represents a form of chronic facial pain that is characterized by its incapacitating nature. The current therapeutic approaches encompass pharmacological agents with carbamazepine or non-pharmacologic options including utilization of percutaneous rhizotomy, Gamma knife radiosurgery or microvascular decompression may be indicated in certain cases. While the interventions may be effective, medications have negative side effects and procedures are invasive which can pose challenges for patients with various comorbidities. High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) has demonstrated safety and efficacy for many types of chronic pain such as musculoskeletal, autoimmune and neuropathic. Herein, we demonstrate the benefits of HILT therapy in the management of trigeminal neuralgia in a 72 year-old patient with a complex history of facial surgery and radiation who had failed pharmacological treatments and denied any invasive procedures.

Trigeminal neuralgia causes severe facial pain, often requiring medications or invasive procedures. High-intensity laser therapy (HILT), known for treating many chronic pains, was explored for a 72 year-old patient with a complex medical history. Previous treatments had failed, and alternatives carried risks. HILT, a safe approach improving blood flow, was given for 3 days, targeting the painful area in the face. The patient experienced improved tissue oxygen supply and pain relief. The follow-up visit at 4 weeks showed sustained relief, enhanced jaw movement and no side effects. Although promising, further research is needed to confirm HILT's effectiveness for trigeminal neuralgia on a larger scale.

Curcumin-cisplatin chemotherapy: A novel strategy in promoting chemotherapy efficacy and reducing side effects.

The efficacy of chemotherapy in cancer therapy is limited due to resistance, treatment selectivity, and severe adverse effects. Immunotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiation, and surgery are the most common therapeutic strategies for treatment, with chemotherapy being the most successful. Nonetheless, these treatments exhibit poor effectiveness due to toxicity and resistance. Therefore, combination therapies of natural products may be used as an effective and novel strategy to overcome such barriers. Cisplatin is a platinum-based chemotherapy agent, and when administered alone, it can lead to severe adverse effects and resistance mechanism resulting in therapeutic failure. Curcumin is a polyphenolic compound extracted from turmeric (Curcuma longa) exhibiting anticancer potential with minimal adverse effects. The combination therapy of curcumin and cisplatin is a novel strategy to mitigate/attenuate cisplatin-related adverse effects and improve the barrier of resistance reducing unwanted effects. However, there are uncertainties on the efficacy of curcumin, and more in depth and high-quality studies are needed. This review aims to explain the adverse effects related to individual cisplatin delivery, the positive outcome of individual curcumin delivery, and the combination therapy of curcumin and cisplatin from nano platform as a novel strategy for cancer therapy.