Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Br J Dermatol ; 177(5): 1322-1336, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28403520

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Male androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common form of hair loss in men. It is characterized by a distinct pattern of progressive hair loss starting from the frontal area and the vertex of the scalp. Although several genetic risk loci have been identified, relevant genes for AGA remain to be defined. OBJECTIVES: To identify biomarkers associated with AGA. METHODS: Molecular biomarkers associated with premature AGA were identified through gene expression analysis using cDNA generated from scalp vertex biopsies of hairless or bald men with premature AGA, and healthy volunteers. RESULTS: This monocentric study reveals that genes encoding mast cell granule enzymes, inflammatory mediators and immunoglobulin-associated immune mediators were significantly overexpressed in AGA. In contrast, underexpressed genes appear to be associated with the Wnt/ß-catenin and bone morphogenic protein/transforming growth factor-ß signalling pathways. Although involvement of these pathways in hair follicle regeneration is well described, functional interpretation of the transcriptomic data highlights different events that account for their inhibition. In particular, one of these events depends on the dysregulated expression of proopiomelanocortin, as confirmed by polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. In addition, lower expression of CYP27B1 in patients with AGA supports the notion that changes in vitamin D metabolism contributes to hair loss. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides compelling evidence for distinct molecular events contributing to alopecia that may pave the way for new therapeutic approaches.


Subject(s)
Alopecia/genetics , Signal Transduction/genetics , 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 1-alpha-Hydroxylase/metabolism , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Bone Morphogenetic Proteins/genetics , Bone Morphogenetic Proteins/metabolism , Case-Control Studies , Catenins/genetics , DNA, Complementary/genetics , Down-Regulation/genetics , Gene Expression/genetics , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Genetic Markers , Hair Follicle/metabolism , Humans , Male , Transforming Growth Factor beta/genetics , Transforming Growth Factor beta/metabolism , Up-Regulation/genetics , Vitamin D/genetics , Vitamin D/metabolism , Wnt Signaling Pathway/genetics
2.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 85(1): 64-9, 2000 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10923607

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mizolastine is a new non-sedative antihistamine and antiallergic drug proven to be effective and safe in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria. OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively explore the time course of mediator release and cell recruitment during allergen challenge and the effects of mizolastine on the event, using the skin chamber model. METHODS: Twelve pollen-sensitive patients (23+/-6 years) were included in a double-blind crossover study. Patients received 10 mg mizolastine or placebo once daily in the first 4-day period and, after a 3-week washout period, vice-versa in the crossover period. On day 4 of each period, a non-invasive in vivo skin chamber technique was used to determine the alteration of vascular permeability, mast cell mediator release, the release of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule -1(sICAM-1) in skin sites challenged with exogenous histamine or grass pollen allergen extract, over an 8-hour period. RESULTS: Challenge with allergen-induced significant mast cell activation, as indicated by the release of histamine, tryptase and LTC4, in chamber fluids 2 hours after initiation of the allergic reaction and during the following 6 hours. Both exogenous histamine and allergen induced significant vasodilatation, which was sustained during the 8-hour challenge, as indicated by the accumulation of protein in the chamber fluids. Likewise, both histamine and allergen induced the release of significant amounts of ICAM-1 throughout the 8-hour period. Mizolastine significantly inhibited the histamine- and allergen-induced extravasation (after 2 hours, P = .003; after 8 hours, P = .009; after 2 hours, P = .044; after 8 hours, P = .003 respectively) and the histamine- and allergen-induced--ICAM-1 release (after 2 hours, P = .004; after 8 hours, P = .05; after 2 hours, P = .03 respectively). CONCLUSION: Mizolastine strongly inhibited the local response to histamine in this skin chamber model with, of interest, inhibition of the release of the soluble adhesion-molecule ICAM-1.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Histamine/immunology , Leukotrienes/metabolism , Pollen/immunology , Skin/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Antibody Formation , Benzimidazoles/analysis , Benzimidazoles/blood , Benzimidazoles/pharmacology , Blister/metabolism , Cell Adhesion , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Exudates and Transudates/chemistry , Female , Histamine H1 Antagonists/pharmacology , Humans , Immunity, Cellular , Inflammation/pathology , Leukocyte Count , Male , Models, Immunological
3.
Dermatologica ; 179 Suppl 1: 41-4, 1989.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2476344

ABSTRACT

Using a noninvasive skin chamber technique, we studied the in vivo development of anaphylactic reactions in 8 pollen-sensitive patients suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis/asthma and showing positive cutaneous reactions after intradermal allergen challenge. As agonists, histamine and pollen were introduced into the skin chambers and left in contact with superficial dermis during 6 h. The release of mediators (histamine and prostaglandin [PG] D2) and the modifications in protein diffusion occurring during the immediate (30 min) and the late (6 and 24 h) cutaneous reaction phases were quantitatively analyzed. 24 h after agonist introduction, the recruitment of inflammatory cells on the superficial dermis was studied by use of Rebuck's windows. Histamine release in pollen-containing skin chambers was immediate and persisted until the 24th h despite replacement of the agonists by control medium at the 6th h. An intense PGD2 release occurred as soon as the first 30 min in chambers containing either exogenous histamine or pollen and was maintained until the 24th h. Protein diffusion induced by histamine and pollen was similar to the control one at 30 min but was intensely enhanced at the 6th h. At the 24th h, pollen-induced protein diffusion was still intense whereas that induced by histamine was analogous to the control one. 24 h after pollen challenge, numerous eosinophils were recruited on the superficial dermis but almost none were observed after control medium or histamine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Histamine Release , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/immunology , Pollen/immunology , Prostaglandin D2/metabolism , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Eosinophils/metabolism , Humans , Prostaglandin D2/analysis , Skin/immunology , Skin Window Technique , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL