Orofacial Myofunctional Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Orofacial myofunctional therapy (OMT) is an alternative form of treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), that incorporates various exercises to optimize tongue placement and increase oropharyngeal tone. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the efficacy of OMT in OSA patients. DATA SOURCES: PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science. REVIEW METHODS: Using PRISMA guidelines, a directed search strategy was performed for randomized control trials (RCTs) published prior to March 24, 2023, featuring 10+ patients with OSA undergoing mono-therapeutic OMT. The primary outcome of interest was apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Secondary outcomes included subjective sleepiness, sleep-related quality-of-life, and snoring frequency. RESULTS: Of the 1244 abstracts that were identified, 7 RCTs involving 310 patients met inclusion criteria. Adult OMT patients had a statistically significant improvement in AHI (MD -10.2; 95% CI, -15.6, -4.8, p < 0.05), subjective sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale; MD -5.66; 95% CI, -6.82, -4.5, p < 0.05), sleep-related quality-of-life (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; MD -3.00; 95% CI, -4.52, -1.49, p < 0.05), and minimum oxygen saturation (MD 2.71; 95% CI, 0.23, 5.18, p < 0.05) when compared with sham OMT or no therapy. Within the single RCT featuring pediatric OMT patients, patients had poor compliance (<50%) and did not show any improvements in AHI, minimum oxygen saturation, or snoring frequency. CONCLUSION: OMT may provide a reasonable alternative for OSA patients who cannot tolerate CPAP or other more established treatment options. OMT benefits appear limited in children due to poor compliance. More studies are required to evaluate compliance and the long-term effects of OMT on OSA outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Laryngoscope, 134:480-495, 2024.

Steroid Efficacy on Audiologic Recovery in Patients With Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Vestibular Schwannoma: A Retrospective Review.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to (i) estimate the incidence of vestibular schwannoma (VS) among patients in an integrated healthcare system who present for evaluation of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) and (ii) evaluate the efficacy of empiric steroid therapy on audiologic recovery among SSNHL patients ultimately diagnosed with VS. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients presenting with SSNHL in 2021 at a multicenter integrated healthcare system serving over 4 million members. Patient demographics, audiometric data, VS diagnosis, therapeutic steroid intervention, and data regarding treatment response were recorded. A clinically significant audiometric improvement was defined as (i) an increase of 15% in word recognition score, (ii) a decrease of 15 dB in four-frequency pure-tone average (PTA) using frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, or (iii) a PTA of <20 dB on follow-up audiogram. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-eight patients were reviewed, of which 309 (56.0% male; mean, 57.5 years) met the inclusion criteria with audiometric data and magnetic resonance imaging data. Ten patients (70.0% male; mean, 51.3 years) were found to have VS. Of these, five patients received oral steroid therapy alone, and five had combination therapy (oral + intratympanic steroid injections). No patients received intratympanic steroid therapy alone. Median PTA improvement with steroid therapy was 3.1-dB hearing loss, and median word recognition score improvement was 16.5%. Six of 10 patients demonstrated clinically significant audiometric improvement with steroid therapy. CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest US-based study showcasing the prevalence of VS in patients originally presenting with SSNHL. It also reinforces previous findings that VS does not preclude trials of steroid therapy.

The incidence and recovery rate of idiopathic vocal fold paralysis: a population-based study.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence and spontaneous recovery rate of idiopathic vocal fold paralysis (IVFP) and paresis (IVFp), and the impact of steroid treatment on rates of recovery. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients with IVFP or IVFp within a large integrated health-care system between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2014. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics, including time to diagnosis, spontaneous recovery status, time to recovery, and treatment, were examined. RESULTS: A total of 264 patients were identified, 183 (69.3%) with IVFP and 81 (30.7%) with IVFp. Nearly all cases (96.6%) were unilateral and 89.8% of patients were over the age of 45. The combined (IVFP and IVFp) 7-year mean incidence was 1.04 cases per 100,000 persons each year with the highest 7-year mean annual incidence in white patients (1.60 per 100,000). The total rate of spontaneous recovery was 29.5%, where 21.2% had endoscopic evidence of resolution and 8.3% had clinical improvement in their voice without endoscopic confirmation. The median time to symptom resolution was 4.0 months. Use of steroids was not linked with spontaneous recovery in multivariable analyses. CONCLUSION: The annual incidence of VFP (IVFP and IVFp) was 1.04 cases per 100,000 persons, with spontaneous recovery occurring in nearly a third of patients, regardless of steroid use.

A systematic review of non-pharmacological interventions to improve nighttime sleep among residents of long-term care settings.

BACKGROUND: Disturbances in sleep and circadian rhythms are common among residents of long-term care facilities. In this systematic review, we aim to identify and evaluate the literature documenting the outcomes associated with non-pharmacological interventions to improve nighttime sleep among long-term care residents. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guided searches of five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) for articles reporting results of experimental or quasi-experimental studies conducted in long-term care settings (nursing homes, assisted-living facilities, or group homes) in which nighttime sleep was subjectively or objectively measured as a primary outcome. We categorized each intervention by its intended use and how it was administered. RESULTS: Of the 54 included studies evaluating the effects of 25 different non-pharmacological interventions, more than half employed a randomized controlled trial design (n = 30); the others used a pre-post design with (n = 11) or without (n = 13) a comparison group. The majority of randomized controlled trials were at low risk for most types of bias, and most other studies met the standard quality criteria. The interventions were categorized as environmental interventions (n = 14), complementary health practices (n = 12), social/physical stimulation (n = 11), clinical care practices (n = 3), or mind-body practices (n = 3). Although there was no clear pattern of positive findings, three interventions had the most promising results: increased daytime light exposure, nighttime use of melatonin, and acupressure. CONCLUSIONS: Non-pharmacological interventions have the potential to improve sleep for residents of long-term care facilities. Further research is needed to better standardize such interventions and provide clear implementation guidelines using cost-effective practices.