Urinary versus serum microRNAs in human oxalic acid poisoning: Contrasting signals and performance.

MicroRNAs are key regulators of the normal kidney function and development, and altered in acute kidney injury (AKI). However, there is a lack of studies comparing serum and urine miRNA expression in toxic AKI in humans. We aimed to compare the global signature of urinary and serum microRNAs, with and without kidney injury, after human oxalic acid poisoning. We profiled urinary microRNAs in patients who ingested oxalic acid and developed no injury (No AKI n = 3), moderate injury (AKIN2 n = 3) or severe injury (AKIN3 n = 3) and healthy controls (n = 3). We validated a signature of 30 urinary microRNAs identified in the discovery profiling, in a second cohort of individuals exposed to oxalic acid (No AKI n = 15, AKIN2 n=11 & AKIN3 n= 18) and healthy controls (n=-27) and we compared the results with previously published serum data. Global profiling in toxic AKI patients showed a higher expression of urinary microRNAs and lower expression of serum microRNAs. Most urine microRNA in the validation cohort were significantly upregulated (25/30, fold change >2.8 and p < 0.05) in AKIN2/3 patients compared to No AKI. Four urinary microRNAs (miR-191, miR-19b, miR-20a and miR-30b) had good diagnostic performance (AUC greater than 0.8) to predict AKIN2/3 between 4-8 hours post ingestion. Poisoning irrespective of AKI led to significantly lower expression of many microRNAs in serum but relatively few changes in urinary miRNA expression. In conclusion, urinary microRNA signature provides a stronger measure of AKI in oxalic acid poisoning compared to serum microRNA. Kidney injury has the greatest impact on urinary microRNA, while poisoning itself was better reflected in serum miRNA. Plasma and urinary microRNAs signatures provide complementary information in toxic kidney injury.

A MicroRNA Signature in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients and Modulation by Colchicine.

BACKGROUND: Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) may play a pathogenic role in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). It is not yet known if miRNAs dysregulated in ACS are modulated by colchicine. We profiled miRNAs in plasma samples simultaneously collected from the aorta, coronary sinus, and right atrium in patients with ACS. METHODS: A total of 396 of 754 miRNAs were detected by TaqMan real-time polymerase chain reaction from EDTA-plasma in a discovery cohort of 15 patients (n = 3 controls, n = 6 ACS standard therapy, n = 6 ACS standard therapy plus colchicine). Fifty-one significantly different miRNAs were then measured in a verification cohort of 92 patients (n = 13 controls, n = 40 ACS standard therapy, n = 39 ACS standard therapy plus colchicine). Samples were simultaneously obtained from the coronary sinus, aortic root, and right atrium. RESULTS: Circulating levels of 30 of 51 measured miRNAs were higher in ACS standard therapy patients compared to controls. In patients with ACS, levels of 12 miRNAs (miR-17, -106b-3p, -191, -106a, -146a, -130a, -223, -484, -889, -425-3p, -629, -142-5p) were lower with colchicine treatment. Levels of 7 of these 12 miRNA were higher in ACS standard therapy patients compared to controls and returned to levels seen in control individuals after colchicine treatment. Three miRNAs suppressed by colchicine (miR-146a, miR-17, miR-130a) were identified as regulators of inflammatory pathways. MicroRNAs were comparable across sampling sites with select differences in the transcoronary gradient of 4 miRNA. CONCLUSION: The levels of specific miRNAs elevated in ACS returned to levels similar to control individuals following colchicine. These miRNAs may mediate ACS (via inflammatory pathways) or increase post-ACS risk, and could be potentially used as biomarkers of treatment efficacy.