Increasing organ blood flow during cardiopulmonary bypass in pigs: comparison of dopamine and perfusion pressure.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether low-dose dopamine infusion (5 micrograms/kg/min) during cardiopulmonary bypass selectively increases perfusion to the kidney, splanchnic organs, and brain at low (45 mm Hg) as well as high (90 mm Hg) perfusion pressures. DESIGN: Randomized crossover trial. SETTING: Animal research laboratory in a university medical center. SUBJECTS: Ten female Yorkshire pigs (weight 29.9 +/- 1.2 kg). INTERVENTION: Anesthetized pigs were placed on normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass at a 100-mL/kg/min flow rate. After baseline measurements, the animal was subjected, in random sequence, to 15-min periods of low perfusion pressure (45 mm Hg), low perfusion pressure with dopamine (5 micrograms/kg/min), high perfusion pressure (90 mm Hg), and high perfusion pressure with dopamine. Regional perfusion (radioactive microspheres) was measured in tissue samples (2 to 10 g) from the renal cortex (outer two-third and inner one-third segments), stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, colon, pancreas, and cerebral hemispheres. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Systemic perfusion pressure was altered by adjusting pump flow rate (r2 = .61; p < .05). In the kidney, cortical perfusion pressure increased from 178 +/- 16 mL/min/100 g at the low perfusion pressure to 399 +/- 23 mL/min/100 g at the high perfusion pressure (p < .05). Perfusion pressure augmentation increased the ratio of outer/inner renal cortical blood flow from 0.9 +/- 0.1 to 1.2 +/- 0.1 (p < .05). At each perfusion pressure, low-dose dopamine had no beneficial effect on renal perfusion or flow distribution. Similar results were found in the splanchnic organs, where regional perfusion was altered by perfusion pressure but not by dopamine. In contrast, neither changing perfusion pressure nor adding low-dose dopamine altered blood flow to the cerebral cortex. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the lower autoregulatory limits of perfusion to the kidneys and splanchnic organs differ from those limits to the brain during normothermic bypass. Selective vasodilation from low-dose dopamine was not found in renal, splanchnic, or cerebral vascular beds. Increasing the perfusion pressure by pump flow, rather than by the addition of low-dose dopamine, enhanced renal and splanchnic but not cerebral blood flows during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Protection from ischaemic-reperfusion injury with adenosine pretreatment is reversed by inhibition of ATP sensitive potassium channels.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to test the hypothesis that the cardioprotective effects against ischaemic-reperfusion injury of pretreatment with adenosine are mediated in part by activation of ATP sensitive potassium channels (K+ATP channels). METHODS: 42 anaesthetised New Zealand White rabbits underwent 30 min coronary occlusion, followed by 2 h reperfusion. Half the animals received a 5 min infusion of 140 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 of adenosine as pretreatment. The remainder of the animals received a 5 min infusion of saline alone as pretreatment. Animals pretreated with adenosine received either a low dose of the K+ATP channel blocker glibenclamide (0.3 mg.kg-1), high dose glibenclamide (3.0 mg.kg-1), or vehicle immediately prior to ischaemia to test whether glibenclamide can reverse the protective effects of adenosine, thus allowing the adenosine effect but antagonising K(+)ATP channel activation during ischaemia. Animals which received saline pretreatment also received low dose glibenclamide, high dose glibenclamide, or vehicle (controls) to evaluate the effect of glibenclamide alone. Infarct size was determined with tetrazolium and Unisperse Blue stains, and transmural blood flow was measured using radioactive microspheres. RESULTS: Although there were no differences in collateral myocardial blood flow during ischaemia or in risk area among the groups, infarct size was reduced by adenosine pretreatment to 8 (SEM 3)% v 36(4)% in controls (p < 0.05). K(+)ATP channel blockade with low dose glibenclamide in saline pretreated animals did not by itself extend the degree of necrosis [33(4)%], whereas low dose glibenclamide prevented the protective effects of adenosine pretreatment [38(3)%]. High dose glibenclamide reversed adenosine protection as well [54(3)%], but at a dose which increased infarct size in saline pretreated animals [52(3)%]. CONCLUSIONS: While adenosine pretreatment protects against necrosis in the rabbit, (1) the expression of this protection depends at least in part upon the actions of K(+)ATP channels during ischaemia, and (2) glibenclamide at higher doses increases infarct size, suggesting either that the K(+)ATP channel is endogenously protective during ischaemia, or that the higher dose has other infarct extending effects.