ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Research suggests that palliative home care should be integrated early into standard care for end-stage COPD patients. Patients also express the wish to be cared for and to die at home. However, a practice model for early integration of palliative home care (PHC) into standard care for end-stage COPD has not been fully developed. AIM: To develop an intervention for early integration of PHC into standard care for end-stage COPD patients. METHODS: We conducted a Phase 0-I study according to the Medical Research Council Framework for the development of complex interventions. Phase 0 aimed to identify the inclusion criteria and key components of the intervention by way of an explorative literature search of interventions, expert consultations, and seven focus groups with general practitioners and community nurses on perceived barriers to and facilitators of early integrated PHC for COPD. In Phase 1, the intervention, its inclusion criteria and its components were developed and further refined by an expert panel and two expert opinions. RESULTS: Phase 0 resulted in identification of inclusion criteria and components from existing interventions, and barriers to and facilitators of early integration of PHC for end-stage COPD. Based on these findings, a nurse-led intervention was developed in Phase I consisting of training for PHC nurses in symptom recognition and physical therapy exercises for end-stage COPD, regular visits by PHC nurses at the patients' homes, two information leaflets on self-management, a semi-structured protocol and follow-up plan to record the outcomes of the home visits, and integration of care by enabling collaboration and communication between home and hospital-based professional caregivers. CONCLUSION: This Phase 0-I trial succeeded in developing a complex intervention for early integration of PHC for end-stage COPD. The use of three methods in Phase 0 gave reliable data on which to base inclusion criteria and components of the intervention. The preliminary effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of the intervention will be subsequently tested in a Phase II study.
Subject(s)
Home Care Services , Palliative Care/methods , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Belgium , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Evidence-Based Nursing/methods , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/nursingABSTRACT
Early integration of palliative home care (PHC) might positively affect people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, PHC as a holistic approach is not well integrated in clinical practice at the end-stage COPD. General practitioners (GPs) and community nurses (CNs) are highly involved in primary and home care and could provide valuable perspectives about barriers to and facilitators for early integrated PHC in end-stage COPD. Three focus groups were organised with GPs (n = 28) and four with CNs (n = 28), transcribed verbatim and comparatively analysed. Barriers were related to the unpredictability of COPD, a lack of disease insight and resistance towards care of the patient, lack of cooperation and experience with PHC for professional caregivers, lack of education about early integrated PHC, insufficient continuity of care from hospital to home, and lack of communication about PHC between professional caregivers and with end-stage COPD patients. Facilitators were the use of trigger moments for early integrating PHC, such as after a hospital admission or when an end-stage COPD patient becomes oxygen-dependent or housebound, positive attitudes towards PHC in informal caregivers, more focus on early integration of PHC in professional caregivers' education, implementing advance care planning in healthcare and PHC systems, and enhancing communication about care and PHC. The results provide insights for clinical practice and the development of key components for successful practice in a phase 0-2 Early Integration of PHC for end-stage COPD (EPIC) trial, such as improving care integration, patients' disease insight and training PHC nurses in care for end-stage COPD.
Subject(s)
Home Care Services , Palliative Care , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Adult , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research , Severity of Illness Index , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) global strategy (2015) provides guidance for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with different first-choice options per GOLD category without specification. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the level of medical experts' consensus on their preferred first-choice treatment within different COPD categories. METHODS: A two-round Delphi Panel consisting of 15 questions was completed by Belgian pulmonologists (n=31) and European (n=10) COPD experts. RESULTS: Good consensus was reached by both expert groups for long-acting bronchodilators instead of short-acting bronchodilators as first-choice treatment in GOLD A. Single bronchodilation with long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) was preferred over long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA) and LABA/LAMA as first-choice treatment in GOLD B and GOLD C. For GOLD D patients based on the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)<50%, a very good consensus was reached for LAMA/LABA as first-choice treatment. For GOLD D patients based on frequent or severe exacerbations, there was a good consensus for LABA/LAMA/inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as first choice in the Belgian group. According to the European experts, both LABA/LAMA and LABA/LAMA/ICS could be the first choice for these patients. CONCLUSION: Belgian and European experts recommend long-acting bronchodilators as first-choice treatment. Treatment containing ICS was found only appropriate in patients with FEV1<50% and ≥2 moderate exacerbations or 1 severe exacerbation/year.
Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists/administration & dosage , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Delphi Technique , Lung/drug effects , Muscarinic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/drug therapy , Administration, Inhalation , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects , Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists/adverse effects , Belgium , Bronchodilator Agents/adverse effects , Consensus , Disease Progression , Drug Combinations , Evidence-Based Medicine , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Lung/physiopathology , Muscarinic Antagonists/adverse effects , Patient Selection , Predictive Value of Tests , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Bronchial thermoplasty is a young yet promising treatment for severe asthma whose benefit for long-term asthma control outweighs the short-term risk of deterioration and hospitalisation in the days following the treatment. It is an innovative treatment whose clinical efficacy and safety are beginning to be better understood. Since this is a device-based therapy, the overall evaluation of risk-benefit is unlike that of pharmaceutical products; safety aspects, regulatory requirements, study design and effect size assessment may be unfamiliar. The mechanisms of action and optimal patient selection need to be addressed in further rigorous clinical and scientific studies. Bronchial thermoplasty fits in perfectly with the movement to expand personalised medicine in the field of chronic airway disorders. This is a device-based complimentary asthma treatment that must be supported and developed in order to meet the unmet needs of modern severe asthma management. The mechanisms of action and the type of patients that benefit from bronchial thermoplasty are the most important challenges for bronchial thermoplasty in the future.
Subject(s)
Asthma/therapy , Bronchoscopy/methods , Hyperthermia, Induced/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Asthma/physiopathology , Bronchi/physiopathology , Bronchoscopy/adverse effects , Bronchoscopy/instrumentation , Catheters , Humans , Hyperthermia, Induced/adverse effects , Hyperthermia, Induced/instrumentation , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: The prevention and relief of symptoms by regular use of bronchodilators is central to the pharmacological management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: The aim of this article is to review the effects of inhaled muscarinic antagonists in the treatment of stable COPD. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: An update of the clinical studies performed with the long-acting inhaled muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) tiotropium bromide in patients with COPD is given. In recent years, combinations of a LAMA and a long-acting inhaled beta2-agonist (LABA), and 'triple therapy' consisting of a LAMA, a LABA, and an inhaled steroid are being developed. Issues of safety of inhaled anticholinergics in COPD are discussed and a short overview of new LAMAs being developed for COPD is given. TAKE HOME MESSAGES: The importance of anticholinergic drug treatment in COPD was largely advanced by the development of the first LAMA, tiotropium bromide. The vast experience obtained with tiotropium bromide has paved the way for new LAMAs such as aclidinium bromide and glycopyrrolate (NVA-237).