ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the associations between concurrent atrial fibrillation and diabetes-related complications among patients with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This nationwide observational cohort study used the health checkup database from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Patients diagnosed with diabetes who underwent health checkups between 2009 and 2012 were investigated. The patients with atrial fibrillation were matched in a 1:5 ratio with those without atrial fibrillation using propensity scores. Study outcomes included macrovascular, microvascular (diabetic retinopathy and diabetic nephropathy), and diabetic foot complications. The risks of clinical outcomes were measured using hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: A total of 65,760 patients with diabetes were analyzed (54,800 without atrial fibrillation and 10,960 with atrial fibrillation). After well-balanced propensity score matching, atrial fibrillation was associated with significantly higher risks of macrovascular complications (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.16), diabetic nephropathy (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.16-1.30), and diabetic foot complications (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.09-1.17) compared with no atrial fibrillation, while the risk of diabetic retinopathy was comparable (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96-1.03). Patients with atrial fibrillation had a significantly higher risk of diabetic foot amputation (HR 4.12, 95% CI 1.98-8.56). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with diabetes, concurrent atrial fibrillation was associated with increased risks for diabetes-related macrovascular complications, diabetic nephropathy, and diabetic foot. Such patients require holistic management to reduce the risk of adverse outcomes.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Diabetic Nephropathies , Diabetic Retinopathy , Humans , Cohort Studies , Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology , Diabetic Retinopathy/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Diabetic Nephropathies/complications , Diabetic Foot/complications , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
AIMS: Heart failure (HF) is associated with obesity, but the relationship between weight change and HF is inconsistent. We examined the relationship between weight change and the incidence of HF in the Korean population. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study design. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 11 210 394 subjects (6 198 542 men and 5 011 852 women) >20 years of age were enrolled in this study. Weight change over 4 years divided into seven categories from weight loss ≥15% to weight gain ≥15%. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals for the incidence of HF were analysed. The HR of HF showed a slightly reverse J-shaped curve by increasing weight change in total and >15% weight loss shows the highest HR (HR 1.647) followed by -15 to -10% weight loss (HR = 1.444). When using normal body mass index with stable weight group as a reference, HR of HF decreased as weight increased in underweight subjects and weight gain ≥15% in obesity Stage II showed the highest HR (HR = 2.97). Sustained weight for 4 years in the underweight and obesity Stages I and II increased the incidence of HF (HR = 1.402, 1.092, and 1.566, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both weight loss and weight gain increased HR for HF. Sustained weight in the obesity or underweight categories increased the incidence of HF.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Body Mass Index , Female , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/etiology , Humans , Incidence , Male , National Health Programs , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) can be mitigated by proton pump inhibitor (PPI) co-therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with anticoagulants. We aimed to evaluate the effect of PPIs on the risk of GIB in Asian patients with AF, treated with oral anticoagulants (OACs), and with a prior history of upper GIB. METHODS: Using a nationwide claims database, OAC-naïve patients with AF and a history of upper GIB before initiating OAC treatment between January 2010 and April 2018 were included. Patients were categorized into 10 groups according to the index OAC (warfarin, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban) and whether or not they received PPI co-therapy, and were followed up for incidence of major GIB. RESULTS: Among a total of 42,048 patients, 40% were prescribed PPIs as co-therapy with OACs. Over a median 0.6 years (interquartile ranges 0.2-1.7 years) of follow-up, rivaroxaban use without PPIs showed the highest crude incidence of major GIB (2.62 per 100 person-years), followed by the use of warfarin without a PPI (2.20 per 100 person-years). Compared to the patients without PPI use, PPI co-therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of major GIB, by 40% and 36%, in the rivaroxaban and warfarin groups, respectively. In dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban users, PPI co-therapy did not show a significant reduction in the risk of major GIB. CONCLUSION: Among patients with AF receiving anticoagulant treatment and with a prior history of upper GIB, PPI co-therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of major GIB in patients treated with rivaroxaban and warfarin.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Stroke , Upper Gastrointestinal Tract , Administration, Oral , Anticoagulants , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Dabigatran , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Humans , Proton Pump Inhibitors/adverse effects , Rivaroxaban , Stroke/epidemiology , WarfarinABSTRACT
Background and Purpose- Limited evidence exists on the effectiveness and safety of warfarin and all 4 available non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) from current clinical practice in the Asian population with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. We aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of warfarin and 4 NOACs. Methods- We studied a retrospective nonrandomized observational cohort of oral anticoagulant naïve nonvalvular patients with atrial fibrillation treated with warfarin or NOACs (rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, or edoxaban) from January 2015 to December 2017, based on the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment database. For the comparisons, warfarin to 4 NOACs and NOAC to NOAC comparison cohorts were balanced using the inverse probability of treatment weighting. Ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, major bleeding, and a composite clinical outcome were evaluated. Results- A total of 116 804 patients were included (25 420 with warfarin, 35 965 with rivaroxaban, 17 745 with dabigatran, 22 177 with apixaban, and 15 496 with edoxaban). Compared with warfarin, all NOACs were associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, major bleeding, and composite outcome. Apixaban and edoxaban showed a lower rate of ischemic stroke compared with rivaroxaban and dabigatran. Apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban had a lower rate of gastrointestinal bleeding and major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban. The composite clinical outcome was nonsignificantly different for apixaban versus edoxaban. Conclusions- In this large contemporary nonrandomized Asian cohort, all 4 NOACs were associated with lower rates of ischemic stroke and major bleeding compared with warfarin. Differences in clinical outcomes between NOACs may give useful guidance for physicians to choose drugs to fit their particular patient clinical profile.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Dabigatran/therapeutic use , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Warfarin/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Aged , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Dabigatran/adverse effects , Female , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Republic of Korea , Rivaroxaban/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Warfarin/adverse effectsABSTRACT
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Numerous studies have found that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) causes or exacerbates dementia, including Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia. However, the evidence is often conflicting. Moreover, no study has investigated the effect of surgical treatment for OSA on dementia. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the Korea National Health Insurance Corporation. A total of 125,417 participants (age 40 years or older) with a new diagnosis of OSA between 2007 and 2014 were included. The participants were classified into two groups: those who underwent uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP group, n = 12,664) and those who underwent no surgical treatment (no surgery group, n = 112,753). Propensity score matching by age and sex was used to select the control group of 627,085 participants. Mean follow-up duration was 4.6 ± 2.3 years. The primary endpoint was newly diagnosed Alzheimer dementia, vascular dementia, or other types of dementia. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval of dementia was calculated for patients with OSA. In the no-surgery group, the incidence of Alzheimer disease (HR 1.30 [1.22-1.38]), vascular dementia (HR 1.20 [1.05-1.36]), and other types of dementia (HR 1.35 [1.20-1.54]) was significantly higher than those among the control group. In the UPPP group, the incidence of Alzheimer disease (HR 1.08 [0.80-1.45]), vascular dementia (HR 0.58 [0.30-1.12]), and other types of dementia (HR 1.00 [0.57-1.77]) was similar to control levels. CONCLUSIONS: Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty may have a preventive effect on dementia in patients with OSA.
Subject(s)
Dementia/prevention & control , Palate, Soft/surgery , Pharynx/surgery , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/surgery , Uvula/surgery , Adult , Aged , Dementia/etiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical data , Republic of Korea , Retrospective Studies , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complicationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether edoxaban shows better risk reduction of ischemic stroke, bleeding, and all-cause mortality than warfarin in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVES: This study compared the effectiveness and safety of edoxaban with those of warfarin in a Korean population with AF. METHODS: Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we included new users of edoxaban and warfarin in patients with AF from January 2014 to December 2016 (n = 4,200 on edoxaban, and n = 31,565 on warfarin) and analyzed the risk of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), hospitalization for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, hospitalization for major bleeding, and all-cause death. The propensity score matching method was used to balance covariates across edoxaban and warfarin users. RESULTS: We compared a 1:3 propensity score-matched cohort of patients with AF who were new users of edoxaban and warfarin (n = 4,061 and n = 12,183, respectively). Baseline characteristics were balanced between the 2 groups (median age 72 years; median CHA2DS2-VASc [congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke, transient ischemic attack, or thromboembolism, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category (female)] score 3). Edoxaban users had a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.693; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.487 to 0.959), ICH (HR: 0.407; 95% CI: 0.182 to 0.785), hospitalization for GI bleeding (HR: 0.597; 95% CI: 0.363 to 0.930), hospitalization for major bleeding (HR: 0.532; 95% CI: 0.352 to 0.773), and all-cause death (HR: 0.716; 95% CI: 0.549 to 0.918) than warfarin users. All subgroups (age, sex, CHA2DS2-VASc score, renal function, edoxaban dose) showed better clinical outcomes with edoxaban than with warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world Asian population with AF, edoxaban might be associated with reduced risk of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and all-cause death compared with warfarin. These benefits were consistent across various high-risk subgroups.