Efficacy of Seven-day High-dose Esomeprazole-based Triple Therapy versus Seven-day Standard Dose Non-esomeprazole-based Triple Therapy as the First-line Treatment of Patients with Helicobacter pylori Infection.

Background/Aims: The rates of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication have declined with the use of proton pump inhibitor- amoxicillin-clarithromycin as the first-line triple therapy. On the other hand, several studies have suggested that high gastric pH levels could affect the H. pylori eradication rate by enhancing the efficacy of antimicrobials. This study compared the efficacy of seven-day high-dose esomeprazole-based triple therapy (7-HEAC) for first-line H. pylori eradication with the seven-day standard dose non-esomeprazole-based triple therapy (7-NEAC) to identify the risk factors related to eradication failure. Methods: This study included 223 patients who were diagnosed with a H. pylori infection and received 7-HEAC or 7-NEAC between June 2016 and January 2017. The H. pylori eradication rates, as well as demographic and clinical factors, were investigated retrospectively. H. pylori eradication was confirmed by a 13C-urea breath test or rapid urease test at least 4 weeks after the completion of therapy. Results: The eradication rates were 67.7% (105/155; 95% CI 59.5-74.8%) in the 7-NEAC group and 80.9% (55/68; 95% CI 69.9-89.8%) in the 7-HEAC group (p=0.045). The adverse event rates were 5.8% (9/155) in the 7-NEAC group and 7.4% (5/68) in the 7-HEAC group (p=0.661). Multivariate analysis revealed being female (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.15-3.76) to be associated with the failure of H. pylori eradication therapy. Conclusions: The eradication rate of the 7-HEAC group was higher than that of the 7-NEAC group. Nevertheless, more effective first-line therapies may be necessary for H. pylori eradication in the near future.

Helicobacter pylori eradication rates with concomitant and tailored therapy based on 23S rRNA point mutation: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy of tailored therapy based on point mutation presence identified with the dual-priming oligonucleotide (DPO)-based multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method compared with concomitant therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were randomly assigned concomitant therapy (amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, metronidazole 500 mg, and lansoprazole 30 mg twice/day for 14 days) or tailored therapy (amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, and lansoprazole 30 mg twice/day for 14 days in point mutation-negative subjects; and amoxicillin 1 g, metronidazole 500 mg, and lansoprazole 30 mg twice/day for 14 days in point mutation-positive subjects). RESULTS: A total of 397 and 352 subjects were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses, respectively. Point mutations were identified in 25.9% of the subjects. The overall eradication rate was not significantly different between the groups by ITT (86.2% vs 81.6%, P = .132) and PP analyses (90.2% vs 86.5%, P = .179). There was no significant difference in the eradication rates between the groups in both the point mutation-negative subjects (91.7% vs 87.3%, P = .154) and the point mutation-positive subjects (71.2% vs 64.7%, P = .312). The eradication rates were significantly lower in the point mutation-positive subjects than in the point mutation-negative subjects in both the concomitant and tailored therapy groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tailored therapy based on point mutation presence identified with the DPO-based multiplex PCR method was as effective as concomitant therapy. The eradication rates of both therapy regimens were suboptimal in point mutation-positive subjects.

Effect of 7-day Bismuth Quadruple Therapy versus 14-day Moxifloxacin Triple Therapy for Second-line Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Both bismuth-containing quadruple therapy and moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy have been suggested as second-line eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 14-day moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy (14-EAM) in second-line H. pylori eradication in comparison to 7-day bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (7-RBMT). METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2015, a total of 569 patients who failed to respond to first-line triple therapy and who subsequently received second-line 7-RBMT or 14-EAM were retrospectively enrolled. The eradication rates were identified using per-protocol (PP) analysis. H. pylori eradication was confirmed by a ¹³C-urea breath test (UBiT-IR300®; Otsuka Electronics, Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) or a rapid urease test (CLOtest® Delta West, Bentley, Australia) at least 4 weeks after completion of eradication therapy. RESULTS: A total of 487 and 82 patients received 7-RBMT and 14-EAM, respectively. PP eradication rates were 93.6% (366/391; 95% CI, 91.0-95.9%) with 7-RBMT and 73.8% (48/65; 95% CI, 63.1-84.6%) with14-EAM (p<0.001). Therefore, the eradication rates with 7-RBMT were significantly higher than with 14-EAM according to the PP analysis. The adverse event rate was 17.1% (67/391) with 7-RBMT and 7.7% (5/65) with 14-EAM (p=0.065). In terms of risk factors, multivariate analysis revealed that 14-EAM (OR, 5.47; 95% CI, 2.74-10.93) was related to H. pylori eradication failure. CONCLUSIONS: 7-RBMT may be an effective second-line therapy in patients who failed to respond to first-line triple therapy in Korea, where there is a high prevalence of H. pylori infection.