Optimizing Nutrition in Neonates with Kidney Dysfunction.

The nutritional management of neonates with kidney disease is complex. There may be significant differences in nutritional needs based on the duration and cause of kidney dysfunction, including acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Furthermore, the treatment modality, including acute (continuous renal replacement therapy and peritoneal dialysis [PD]) and chronic (intermittent hemodialysis and PD) approaches may differentially affect nutritional losses and dietary needs. In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology of compromised nutrition in neonates with AKI and CKD. We also summarize the existing data and consensus recommendations on the provision of nutrition to neonates with AKI and CKD. We highlight the paucity of data on micronutrient losses and the need for future prospective studies to enhance nutritional supplementation to hopefully improve outcomes in these patients.

Changes in bone biomarkers in response to different dosing regimens of cholecalciferol supplementation in children with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: The effect of different dosing regimens of cholecalciferol supplementation on bone biomarkers has not been studied in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial which included children with CKD stages 2-4 with vitamin D deficiency (25-hydroxy vitamin D (25OHD) < 30 ng/ml) randomized 1:1:1 to receive an equivalent dose of oral cholecalciferol as daily, weekly or monthly treatment. Markers of bone formation (bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), procollagen I N terminal peptide (PINP)), bone resorption (tartarate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAP), C terminal telopeptide (CTX)), and osteocyte markers (intact fibroblast growth factor 23 (iFGF23), sclerostin) and soluble klotho were measured at baseline and after 3 months of intensive replacement therapy. The change in biomarkers and ratio of markers of bone formation to resorption were compared between treatment arms. BAP and TRAP were expressed as age- and sex-specific z-scores. RESULTS: 25OHD levels increased with cholecalciferol supplementation, with 85% achieving normal levels. There was a significant increase in the BAP/TRAP ratio (p = 0.04), iFGF23 (p = 0.004), and klotho (p = 0.002) with cholecalciferol therapy, but this was comparable across all three therapy arms. The BAPz was significantly higher in the weekly arm (p = 0.01). The change in 25OHD (Δ25OHD) inversely correlated with ΔPTH (r = - 0.4, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although cholecalciferol supplementation was associated with a significant increase in bone formation, the three dosing regimens of cholecalciferol supplementation have a comparable effect on the bone biomarker profile, suggesting that they can be used interchangeably to suit the patient's needs and optimize adherence to therapy. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Determining the optimal cholecalciferol dosing regimen in children with CKD: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment regimen for correcting 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) deficiency in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is not known. We compared cholecalciferol dosing regimens for achieving and maintaining 25OHD concentrations ≥30 ng/mL in children with CKD stages 2-4. METHODS: An open-label, multicentre randomized controlled trial randomized children with 25OHD concentrations <30 ng/mL in 1:1:1 to oral cholecalciferol 3000 IU daily, 25 000 IU weekly or 100 000 IU monthly for 3 months (maximum three intensive courses). In those with 25OHD ≥30 ng/mL, 1000 IU cholecalciferol daily (maintenance course) was given for up to 9 months. Primary outcome was achieving 25OHD ≥30 ng/mL at the end of intensive phase treatment. RESULTS: Ninety children were randomized to daily (n = 30), weekly (n = 29) or monthly (n = 31) treatment groups. At the end of intensive phase, 70/90 (77.8%) achieved 25OHD ≥30 ng/mL; 25OHD concentrations were comparable between groups (median 44.3, 39.4 and 39.3 ng/mL for daily, weekly and monthly groups, respectively; P = 0.24) with no difference between groups for time to achieve 25OHD ≥30 ng/mL (P = 0.28). There was no change in calcium, phosphorus and parathyroid hormone, but fibroblast growth factor 23 (P = 0.002) and klotho (P = 0.001) concentrations significantly increased and were comparable in all treatment groups. Irrespective of dosing regimen, children with glomerular disease had 25OHD concentrations lower than non-glomerular disease (25.8 versus 41.8 ng/mL; P = 0.007). One child had a 25OHD concentration of 134 ng/mL, and 5.5% had hypercalcemia without symptoms of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Intensive treatment with oral cholecalciferol as daily, weekly or monthly regimens achieved similar 25OHD concentrations between treatment groups, without toxicity. Children with glomerular disease required higher doses of cholecalciferol compared with those with non-glomerular disease.