Clinical relevance of Tai Chi on pain and physical function in adults with knee osteoarthritis: An ancillary meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The clinical relevance of Tai Chi on pain, stiffness, and physical function in adults with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) has not been established. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to address this gap. Eight randomized controlled trials from a recent meta-analysis representing 407 participants (216 Tai Chi, 191 control) in adults ≥18 years of age with KOA and included the assessment of pain, stiffness, and physical function using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) were assessed. The inverse variance heterogeneity model (IVhet) was first used to pool standardized mean difference effect sizes (ES) for each outcome. Clinical relevance, i.e., number-needed-to treat (NNT) ≤10 and relative risk reduction (RRR) ≥25% was calculated across assumed controlled risks (ACR) ranging from 0.01 to 0.99. Statistically significant improvements were found for pain (ES, -0.75, 95% CI, -0.99, -0.51; Q = 8.9, p = 0.26; I2 = 21%), stiffness (ES, -0.70, 95% CI, -0.95, -0.46; Q = 9.6, p = 0.21; I2 = 27%), and physical function (ES, -0.91, 95% CI, -1.12, -0.70; Q = 7.2, p = 0.40; I2 = 3%). The intersection of results for a NNT ≤10 and RRR ≥25% yielded high evidence and clinically relevant improvements across a wide range of ACR for pain (0.15 to 0.88), stiffness (0.15 to 0.87), and physical function (0.13 to 0.97). These findings suggest that Tai Chi results in statistically significant as well as clinically important improvements in pain, stiffness, and physical function across a wide range of ACR in adults with KOA.

Inter-individual response differences on resting blood pressure as a result of qigong in adults: An ancillary meta-analysis of randomized trials.

OBJECTIVE: Conduct an ancillary meta-analysis to determine whether true inter-individual response differences (IIRD) exist with respect to the effects of qigong on resting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in adults. METHODS: Data from a meta-analysis representing 370 participants (181 qigong, 189 control) from 7 randomized trials on qigong and resting SBP and DBP in men and women were included. Qigong and control group change outcome standard deviations treated as point estimates for both resting SBP and DBP were used to calculate true IIRD from each study. The inverse variance heterogeneity (IVhet) model was used to pool results. RESULTS: For participants with essential hypertension, statistically significant and clinically important reductions in resting SBP (X̅, -18.2 mmHg, 95% CI, -21.3 to -15.2 mmHg) and DBP (X̅, -11.7 mmHg, 95% CI, -17.0 to -6.3 mmHg) were found. However, true IIRD were neither significant nor clinically important for either SBP (X̅, -6.0 mmHg, 95% CI, -9.1 to 3.5 mmHg) or DBP (X̅, 2.8 mmHg, 95% CI, -3.4 to 5.2 mmHg). The 95% prediction interval for true IIRD was - 11.9 to 8.4 mmHg for SBP and - 5.8 to 7.0 mmHg for DBP. CONCLUSIONS: While qigong is associated with reductions in resting SBP and DBP in adults with essential hypertension, a lack of true IIRD exists, suggesting that other external factors are responsible for any variation.

Yoga, Health-Related Quality of Life and Mental Well-Being: A Re-analysis of a Meta-analysis Using the Quality Effects Model.

BACKGROUND: Provide robust and practically relevant information regarding the association between yoga, health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL), and mental well-being (MWB) in older adults. METHODS: Data were derived from a recent meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled yoga trials representing 752 adults ≥60 years of age. Standardized mean difference effect sizes (ESs) were pooled using the recently developed quality effects model and 95% compatibility intervals (CI). Small-study effects were examined using the Doi plot and Luis Furuya-Kanamori (LFK) index. Sensitivity and cumulative meta-analyses were conducted as well as percentile improvement, number needed to treat (NNT), and number to benefit. The grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) instrument was used to assess the strength of the evidence. RESULTS: Yoga was associated with improvements in both HRQOL (ES = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.25-0.77, I2 = 63.1%) and MWB (ES = 0.39, 95% CI, 0.15-0.63, I2 =56.2%). Percentile improvements were 19.5 for HRQOL and 15.3 for MWB whereas the NNT was 4 for HRQOL and 5 for MWB. An estimated 378,222 and 302,578 U.S. yoga-practicing adults ≥65 years of age could potentially improve their HRQOL and MWB, respectively. Major asymmetry suggestive of small-study effects was observed for MWB but not HRQOL. Further examination for asymmetry revealed that greater improvements in MWB were associated with more (151 vs. 68) minutes of yoga per week (p = .007). Overall strength of evidence was considered "high" for HRQOL and "moderate" for MWB. CONCLUSIONS: Yoga is associated with improvements in HRQOL and MWB among older adults, with approximately 150 minutes or more per week possibly optimal.

Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in nutrition research.

There exists an ever-increasing number of systematic reviews, with or without meta-analysis, in the field of nutrition. Concomitant with this increase is the increased use of such to guide future research as well as both practice and policy-based decisions. Given this increased production and consumption, a need exists to educate both producers and consumers of systematic reviews, with or without meta-analysis, on how to conduct and evaluate high-quality reviews of this nature in nutrition. The purpose of this paper is to try and address this gap. In the present manuscript, the different types of systematic reviews, with or without meta-analyses, are described as well as the description of the major elements, including methodology and interpretation, with a focus on nutrition. It is hoped that this non-technical information will be helpful to producers, reviewers and consumers of systematic reviews, with or without meta-analysis, in the field of nutrition.

Meditative Movement Therapies and Health-Related Quality-of-Life in Adults: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses.

Poor health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) is a significant public health issue while the use of meditative movement therapies has been increasing. The purpose of this investigation was to carry out a systematic review of previous meta-analyses that examined the effects of meditative movement therapies (yoga, tai chi and qigong) on HRQOL in adults. Previous meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials published up through February, 2014 were included by searching nine electronic databases and cross-referencing. Dual-selection and data abstraction occurred. The Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews Instrument (AMSTAR) was used to assess methodological quality. Standardized mean differences that were pooled using random-effects models were included. In addition, 95% prediction intervals were calculated as well as the number needed-to-treat and percentile improvements. Of the 510 citations screened, 10 meta-analyses representing a median of 3 standardized mean differences in 82 to 528 participants (median = 270) with breast cancer, schizophrenia, low back pain, heart failure and diabetes, were included. Median methodological quality was 70%. Median length, frequency and duration of the meditative movement therapies were 12 weeks, 3 times per week, for 71 minutes per session. The majority of results (78.9%) favored statistically significant improvements (non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals) in HRQOL, with standardized mean differences ranging from 0.18 to 2.28. More than half of the results yielded statistically significant heterogeneity (Q ≤ 0.10) and large or very large inconsistency (I2 ≥ 50%). All 95% prediction intervals included zero. The number-needed-to-treat ranged from 2 to 10 while percentile improvements ranged from 9.9 to 48.9. The results of this study suggest that meditative movement therapies may improve HRQOL in adults with selected conditions. However, a need exists for a large, more inclusive meta-analysis (PROSPERO Registration #CRD42014014576).