A survey of child neurologists about reproductive healthcare for adolescent women with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate child neurologists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care for adolescent and young adult women with epilepsy (WWE). METHODS: Child neurologists (including attending physicians, residents, fellows, and advanced practitioners) completed an online survey distributed through subspecialty listservs. We analyzed results using descriptive statistics, chi-square, and logistic regression. RESULTS: Two hundred eight child neurologists completed the survey. Most believed that child neurologists should counsel young WWE on: teratogenesis (99%, n = 206/207), contraception-antiseizure medication interactions (96%, n = 194/202), pregnancy (95%, n = 198/206), contraception (89%, n = 184/206) and folic acid supplementation (70%, n = 144/205). Fewer respondents felt confident with such counseling (teratogenesis: 90%, n = 188/208, drug interactions: 65%, n = 133/208, pregnancy 75%, n = 156/208, contraception: 47-64%, n = 96-134/208, p < 0.05). Ninety-five percent (n = 172/181) reported ever discussing SRH with typically developing young WWE, compared to 78% (n = 141/181) for young WWE with mild intellectual disability (p < 0.01). One third (n = 56/170) who ever discussed SRH did not do so routinely. Respondents correctly answered 87% ±â€¯5% of knowledge questions about SRH for WWE, 80% ±â€¯4% of questions about teratogenic antiseizure medications, and 61% ±â€¯7% of questions about contraception-antiseizure drug interactions. The greatest barrier to SRH care was time constraints (80%, n = 149/186). The majority (64%, n = 119/186) identified solutions including longer appointment times and co-managing SRH care with other specialties. CONCLUSIONS: Findings reveal gaps in SRH care by child neurologists for adolescent and young adult WWE, especially those with mild intellectual disability. Provider-identified barriers and solutions may serve as targets to improve SRH care for this population.

Carnitine Responsive Migraine Headache Syndrome: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review carnitine's role in migraine and headache, present a case of a patient with intractable chronic migraine refractory to medications but exquisitely responsive to mitochondrial cofactors with a particularly prompt response to L-carnitine supplementation with dose response, and suggest scenarios where L-carnitine could be considered for prophylactic treatment in migraine and intractable headache with migraine features. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiple treatments modalities are used to treat migraine, including nutraceutical therapies. Mitochondrial supplements are often used to treat migraine, based on controlled trials. One of the nutraceutical therapies used in neurological and non-neurological conditions is L-carnitine. A few studies have examined the effect of carnitine in patients with migraine. We present a case of a patient with chronic migraine-like headaches found to have carnitine deficiency whose headaches greatly improved with carnitine supplementation. This case suggests that secondary carnitine deficiency may cause chronic migraine. Energy deficiency states occur with migraine, and replenishment of energy substrates has demonstrated some improvement in migraine. Recent studies suggest that L-carnitine with other mitochondrial cofactors may be migraine preventives. The exact link between carnitine and migraine is unknown. Perhaps carnitine deficiency should be in the differential for refractory migraine. Supplementation with L-carnitine merits exploration as a nutraceutical treatment of chronic migraine. Our case suggests that there may be a dose-dependent response to L-carnitine.