Risk of Hepatitis C Virus Transmission through Acupuncture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background/Aims: Chronic hepatitis C is a major risk factor for liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and hepatic failure. Although traditional practices, including acupuncture, tend to increase the risk of HCV infection, the association remains controversial. Therefore, the current meta-analytical study was undertaken to evaluate the risks of acupuncture and hepatitis C transmission. Methods: Two researchers independently screened studies from the databases encompassing the period from inception to May 12, 2022. Baseline demographics, HCV transmission OR, and 95% CIs were extracted, pooled, and analyzed using random-effect models. Subgroup analyses utilizing study design and ethnicity were performed. Heterogeneity and publication bias were analyzed using the Higgins I2 test and funnel plots, respectively. Results: In all, 28 studies with 194,826 participants (178,583 controls [91.7%] vs. 16,243 acupuncture users [8.3%]) were included in the final analysis. The pooled analysis showed that acupuncture users had a significantly higher HCV transmission rate than controls with heterogeneity (OR, 1.84 [1.46-2.32]; p<0.001; I2 =80%). In the subgroup analysis, both cross-sectional case-control (n=14; OR, 1.96 [1.47-2.61]; p<0.001; I2 =88%) and cross-sectional studies (n=12; OR, 1.85 [1.32-2.61]; p<0.001; I2 =0%) showed significantly higher HCV infection rates in the acupuncture group than in the control group. Both Asian and non-Asian acupuncture users showed a higher HCV transmission risk than the controls (all Ps<0.001). No significant publication bias was observed. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that acupuncture increases the risk of HCV transmission. Due to HCV's contagiousness, unsafe medical and social practices (including acupuncture) should be performed with caution.

Benefits of Flavored Lactose-Free Milk for Korean Adults with Lactose Intolerance.

Although lactose-free dairy products for the clinical management of lactose intolerance (LI) are widely available, scientific evidence on their efficacy is still lacking. This study comparatively analyzed the efficacy of flavored lactose-free milk (LFM) and whole milk (WM) in reducing symptoms in South Korean adults with LI. This prospective study was conducted in adults suspected of LI. All screened participants underwent the hydrogen breath test (HBT) using 570 mL of chocolate-flavored WM (20 g of lactose) and responded to a symptom questionnaire. LI was confirmed when the ΔH2 peak exceeded 16 ppm above baseline values and with the occurrence of symptoms after WM consumption. The participants who were diagnosed with LI underwent the HBT again with 570 mL of chocolate-flavored LFM (0 g of lactose), followed by the symptom questionnaire survey after 1 week. After excluding 40 participants who did not meet the diagnostic criteria for LI and 2 who were lost to follow-up, a total of 28 lactose-intolerant individuals were enrolled in the study. The ΔH2 values in the first HBT were significantly higher than those in the second HBT (33.3 ± 21.6 ppm vs. 8.6 ± 6.3 ppm, P < .001). Similarly, there was a significant reduction in the total symptom score in the second HBT (4.18 ± 1.51 vs. 0.61 ± 0.98, P < .001). Flavored LFM is well tolerated in South Korean adults diagnosed with LI based on the HBT and symptom questionnaire results. Therefore, LFM may be a viable alternative to WM.

Comparison of chemoembolization with and without radiation therapy and sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a propensity score analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization with and without radiation therapy (RT) versus sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study involved 557 patients with HCC with PVTT who initially received chemoembolization (1997-2002; n = 295), chemoembolization and RT (2003-2008; n = 196), or sorafenib (2009-2012; n = 66) according to eligibility criteria among an initial population of 617. The three groups were divided into three pairs (chemoembolization vs chemoembolization/RT, chemoembolization vs sorafenib, and chemoembolization/RT vs sorafenib), and time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were compared by propensity-score analyses. RESULTS: The chemoembolization/RT group had longer median TTP and OS than the chemoembolization-alone and sorafenib groups (P < .001). Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that chemoembolization/RT treatment was an independent predictor of favorable TTP and OS. In the matched cohort, median TTP and OS were significantly longer in the chemoembolization/RT group than the chemoembolization-alone group (102 pairs; TTP, 8.7 mo vs 3.6 mo [P < .001]; OS, 11.4 mo vs 7.4 mo [P = .023]) or the sorafenib group (30 pairs; TTP, 5.1 mo vs 1.6 mo [P < .001]; OS, 8.2 mo vs 3.2 mo [P < .001]), in agreement with the inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) outcomes. In matching analyses, the chemoembolization-alone group had longer median TTP and OS than the sorafenib group (46 pairs; TTP, 3.4 mo vs 1.8 mo [P < .001]; OS, 5.9 mo vs 4.4 mo [P = .003]). There was no significant difference in terms of OS with the IPTW approach (P = .108), but there was one in terms of TTP (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitation of a retrospective study, the present data indicate that transarterial chemoembolization combined with RT could be considered as an alternative to the standard sorafenib in the treatment of patients with advanced-stage HCC with PVTT.