Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Atorvastatin 40 mg/ω-3 Fatty Acids 4 g Fixed-dose Combination and Atorvastatin 40 mg Monotherapy in Hypertriglyceridemic Patients who Poorly Respond to Atorvastatin 40 mg Monotherapy: An 8-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Phase III Study.

PURPOSE: Residual cardiovascular risk in patients with hypertriglyceridemia, despite optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels being achieved with intensive statin treatment, is a global health issue. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of treatment with a combination of high-dose atorvastatin/Ω-3 fatty acid compared to atorvastatin + placebo in patients with hypertriglyceridemia who did not respond to statin treatment. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients who had residual hypertriglyceridemia after a 4-week run-in period of atorvastatin treatment were randomly assigned to receive UI-018 (fixed-dose combination atorvastatin/Ω-3 fatty acid 40 mg/4 g) or atorvastatin 40 mg + placebo (control). The primary efficacy end points were the percentage change from baseline in non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) level at the end of treatment and the adverse events recorded during treatment. A secondary end point was the percentage change from baseline in triglyceride level. FINDINGS: After 8 weeks of treatment, the percentage changes from baseline in non-HDL-C (-4.4% vs +0.6%; p = 0.02) and triglycerides (-18.5% vs +0.9%; p < 0.01) were significantly greater in the UI-018 group (n = 101) than in the control group (n = 99). These changes were present in subgroups of advanced age (≥65 years), status (body mass index ≥25 kg/m2), or without diabetes. The prevalences of adverse events did not differ between the 2 treatment groups. IMPLICATIONS: In patients with residual hypertriglyceridemia despite receiving statin treatment, a combination of high-dose atorvastatin/Ω-3 fatty acid was associated with a greater reduction of triglyceride and non-HDL-C compared with atorvastatin + placebo, without significant adverse events.

Solid cancers after antiplatelet therapy: Confirmations, controversies, and challenges.

The role of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents in tumour growth and prognosis is not new, and currently under intense investigation. Some randomised data strongly suggest that this association exists, but it is complex, and not necessarily pointed at the same direction. The potential mechanisms responsible for such harmful association include a direct hazard of novel antithrombotics on cancer, indirect promotion of tumour growth, easier metastatic dissemination due to instability of platelet-tumour cell aggregates, or/and inability to keep cancer cells locally in situ are considered. The latest randomised evidence ultimately rejected the drug-specific cancer risks, clearly indicating the class-effect. In lay terms "cancers follow bleeding", which seems to be true for antithrombotic agents in general. Significant excess of solid cancers which was similar after prasugrel in TRITON, and with vorapaxar in TRACER trials was confirmed by the FDA reviews. Later, extra cancer deaths reported following clopidogrel and prasugrel in DAPT, and after ticagrelor in PEGASUS are also of concern. However, there are remaining controversies with regard to published cancer risks after ticagrelor (PLATO), or another vorapaxar trial (TRA2P), while full disclosure of separate clopidogrel and prasugrel cancer data in DAPT is still lacking. In short, if we apply moderate antiplatelet strategies for over two years, or aggressive regimens including triple therapy for much less than one year, the solid cancer risks emerge. Currently, more delicate platelet inhibition, and shorter exposure to dual oral antiplatelet agents should prevail.

Rosuvastatin attenuates inflammation, apoptosis and fibrosis in a rat model of cyclosporine-induced nephropathy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Cyclosporine (CsA)-induced kidney injury is characterized by renal dysfunction with inflammatory cell infiltrations, apoptosis and fibrosis. Pleiotropic effects of statins may exert anti-inflammatory, antiapoptotic and antifibrotic actions beyond lipid control. The aim of this study is to investigate whether rosuvastatin (RUS) has anti-inflammatory, antiapoptotic and antifibrotic effects on chronic CsA-induced nephropathy in a rat model. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats fed a low-sodium diet were divided into three treatment groups: control (0.9% saline injection), CsA (15 mg/kg/day by subcutaneous injection), CsA + RUS (10 mg/kg/day by gastric gavage). Renal function, CsA level and lipid levels were measured at the end of 4 weeks. The expression of ED-1, transforming growth factor-ß(1) (TGF-ß(1)) and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) for inflammation and fibrosis were examined by Western blot analysis. The expression levels of apoptosis-associated factors were examined by Western blot analysis. Apoptosis was evaluated using the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated biotin nick end-labeling (TUNEL) method. RESULTS: Kidney function was decreased in CsA-treated rats compared with controls, which was attenuated by RUS. RUS did not affect the lipid level or the blood CsA level. TUNEL staining showed that RUS inhibited CsA-induced tubular apoptosis. RUS decreased CsA-induced increased expression of Bax/Bcl-2 ratio. The expressions of ED-1, α-SMA, TGF-ß(1), Smad2/3, Smad4 and p-JNK were increased in CsA-treated rats, which were attenuated by RUS. Tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis in CsA-treated rats were attenuated by RUS supplementation. CONCLUSION: RUS supplementation attenuates proinflammatory and apoptosis-related factors and inhibits the fibrotic pathways including the smad-dependent and smad-independent pathways in a rat model of CsA-induced nephropathy.