ABSTRACT
This retrospective national study compared the use of alemtuzumab-based conditioning regimens for hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) in acquired severe aplastic anemia with antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-based regimens. One hundred patients received alemtuzumab and 55 ATG-based regimens. A matched sibling donor (MSD) was used in 87 (56%), matched unrelated donor (MUD) in 60 (39%) and other related or mismatched unrelated donor (UD) in 8 (5%) patients. Engraftment failure occurred in 9% of the alemtuzumab group and 11% of the ATG group. Five-year OS was 90% for the alemtuzumab and 79% for the ATG groups, P=0.11. For UD HSCT, OS of patients was better when using alemtuzumab (88%) compared with ATG (57%), P=0.026, although smaller numbers of patients received ATG. Similar outcomes for MSD HSCT using alemtuzumab or ATG were seen (91% vs 85%, respectively, P=0.562). A lower risk of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was observed in the alemtuzumab group (11% vs 26%, P=0.031). On multivariate analysis, use of BM as stem cell source was associated with better OS and EFS, and less acute and cGVHD; young age was associated with better EFS and lower risk of graft failure. This large study confirms successful avoidance of irradiation in the conditioning regimens for MUD HSCT patients.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Aplastic/therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use , Bone Marrow Transplantation/methods , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Alemtuzumab , Bone Marrow Cells/cytology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Graft Survival , Graft vs Host Disease , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Siblings , Tissue Donors , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom , Young AdultABSTRACT
In this paper, we review recent work on aspects of corticothalamic interactions in the auditory and in the visual systems. There are gross similarities in the arrangements of these systems, but considerable contrasts in the processing computations and in the effects of corticothalamic feedback.