Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Healthc (Amst) ; 8 Suppl 1: 100484, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34175097

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We tested the capacity of the 60-site VA Women's Health Practice-Based Research Network (WH-PBRN), embedded within VA, to employ a multisite card study to collect women Veterans' perspectives about Complementary and Integrative Health (CIH) and to rapidly return findings to participating sites and partnered national policy-makers in support of a Learning Health System (LHS) wherein evidence generation informs ongoing improvement. METHODS: VA primary care clinic clerks and nurses distributed anonymous surveys (patient feedback forms) at clinics for up to two weeks in fiscal year 2017, asking about CIH behavior and preferred delivery methods. We examined the project's feasibility, representativeness, acceptability, and impact via a tracking system, national administrative data, debriefing notes, and three surveys of WH-PBRN Site Leads. RESULTS: Twenty geographically diverse and largely representative VA Medical Centers and 11 Community-Based Outpatient Clinics volunteered to participate. Over six months, N = 1191 women Veterans responded (median 57; range 8-151 per site). In under three months, we returned local findings benchmarked against multisite findings to all participating sites and summary findings to national VA partners. Sites and partners disseminated results to clinical and leadership stakeholders, who then applied results as warranted. CONCLUSIONS: VA effectively mobilized an embedded PBRN to implement a timely, representative, acceptable and impactful operations project. IMPLICATIONS: Card studies by PBRNs within large, national healthcare systems can provide rapid feedback to participating sites and national leaders to guide policies, programs, and practices. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Self-selected respondents could have biased results.


Subject(s)
Learning Health System , Veterans , Feedback , Female , Humans , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veterans Health
2.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 28(5): 649-57, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26355137

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration (VA) Women's Health Practice-Based Research Network (WH-PBRN) was created to foster innovations for the health care of women veterans. The inaugural study by the WH-PBRN was designed to identify women veterans' own priorities and preferences for mental health services and to inform refinements to WH-PBRN operational procedures. Addressing the latter, this article reports lessons learned from the inaugural study. METHODS: WH-PBRN site coordinators at the 4 participating sites convened weekly with the study coordinator and the WH-PBRN program manager to address logistical issues and identify lessons learned. Findings were categorized into a matrix of challenges and facilitators related to key study elements. RESULTS: Challenges to the conduct of PBRN-based research included tracking of regulatory documents; cross-site variability in some regulatory processes; and troubleshooting logistics of clinic-based recruitment. Facilitators included a central institutional review board, strong relationships between WH-PBRN research teams and women's health clinic teams, and the perception that women want to help other women veterans. CONCLUSION: Our experience with the inaugural WH-PBRN study demonstrated the feasibility of establishing productive relationships between local clinicians and researchers, and of recruiting a special population (women veterans) in diverse sites within an integrated health care system. This identified strengths of a PBRN approach.


Subject(s)
Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veterans Health , Veterans/psychology , Women's Health , Female , Humans , Perception , United States
4.
Ethn Dis ; 21(3 Suppl 1): S1-107-13, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22352088

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a process evaluation of the Restoration Center Los Angeles, a community-academic partnered planning effort aimed at holistically addressing the unmet mental health and substance abuse needs of the Los Angeles African American community. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions on key domains of partnership effectiveness were conducted with a random stratified sample of participants varying by level of involvement. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven partners representing grassroots community agencies, faith-based organizations, service providers, and academic institutions. MEASURES: Common themes identified by an evaluation consultant and partners relating to partnership effectiveness, perceived benefits and costs, and future expectations. RESULTS: Findings underscore the importance of considering the potential issues that may arise with the increasing diversity of partners and perspectives. Many of the challenges and facilitating factors that arise within academic-community partnerships were similarly experienced between the diverse set of community partners. Challenges that affected partnership development between community-to-community partners included differences in expectations regarding the final goal of the project, trust-building, and the distribution of funds. Despite such challenges, partners were able to jointly develop a final set of recommendations for the creation of restoration centers, which was viewed as a major accomplishment. CONCLUSIONS: Limited guidance exists on how to navigate differences that arise between community members who have shared identities on some dimensions (eg, African American ethnicity, Los Angeles residence) but divergent identities on other dimensions (eg, formal church affiliation). With increasing diversity of community representation, careful attention needs to be dedicated to not only the development of academic-community partnerships but also community-community partnerships.


Subject(s)
Community-Based Participatory Research/organization & administration , Interprofessional Relations , Black or African American , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , Los Angeles , Mental Health , Program Development , Religion , Substance-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Universities
5.
Community Ment Health J ; 46(6): 563-9, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19688594

ABSTRACT

This study examined the relationship between herbal medication and dietary supplement (HMDS) use and mental health characteristics. Data are drawn from a national household survey of the United States' civilian, non-institutionalized population (N = 9,585). Psychiatric medication and HMDS use, psychiatric diagnoses and treatment needs, utilization and satisfaction were assessed. Compared to non-users, HMDS users were more likely to perceive themselves as having mental health needs, to have received mental health and primary care treatment, and to be dissatisfied with their overall healthcare. Psychiatric medication use was not related to HMDS use, and in multivariate analyses, HMDS use was associated with perceived mental health needs. Differences in use of specific HMDS between those with and without a psychiatric disorder were also examined. The use of HMDS warrants particular attention in persons with perceived mental health problems as these individuals may be turning to HMDS use for treatment of their symptoms.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Phytotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Plant Preparations , Adult , Aged , Data Collection , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Health , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Prevalence , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Socioeconomic Factors , United States/epidemiology
6.
Psychiatr Serv ; 56(2): 206-8, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15703350

ABSTRACT

This study surveyed attitudes toward mental health services and barriers to providing these services within the agencies of QueensCare Health and Faith Partnership, a network of faith-based organizations, and parish nurses who provided health care in a low-income, ethnically diverse area of Los Angeles. Representatives from 42 organizations responded. Informal counseling was the most frequently provided service (57 percent); yet only 19 percent reported that counselors had at least a moderate amount of training. Although 69 percent felt that referrals to nonreligious counselors were appropriate, 50 percent were reluctant to collaborate with government agencies. Barriers to providing mental health services included limited professional training, reluctance to partner with government programs, and financial and staffing limitations.


Subject(s)
Health Services Needs and Demand , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Religion and Psychology , Social Support , Spiritual Therapies/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Crisis Intervention/methods , Humans , Los Angeles/epidemiology , Needs Assessment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL