Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 42(3): 195-202, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31122786

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess the influence of forward head posture on the mechanical parameters and pressure pain threshold of superficial neck muscles in clinically nonsymptomatic individuals with sedentary jobs. METHODS: Twenty-five office workers with forward head posture and 25 office workers with normal head posture were matched for sex, age, body mass index, and the nature and duration of their work and were compared at a single point. The study participants were divided into study groups on the basis of photometric craniovertebral angle measurements. The upper trapezius, sternocleidomastoid, and splenius capitis mechanical properties were assessed in the sitting position. Primary outcome measures were muscle stiffness (N/m), muscle tone (Hz), and muscle elasticity. The secondary variable was perceived pain threshold. RESULTS: No significant differences between the groups were found for biomechanical properties and perceived pain threshold in the studied muscles. CONCLUSION: Forward head posture has no impact on muscle stiffness, tone, and elasticity, nor does it increase the pressure sensitivity of superficial neck muscles in healthy, mildly symptomatic office workers. It is most likely that not incorrect posture of the cervical spine, but probably other factors combined with forward head posture, like comorbid acute and chronic cervical pain and musculoskeletal disorders or prolonged sitting, contribute to changes in active myofascial tone and tensegrity as well as increased pressure sensitivity of neck muscles.


Subject(s)
Neck Muscles/physiology , Neck Pain/etiology , Posture/physiology , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Head/physiology , Humans , Male , Paraspinal Muscles/physiology , Superficial Back Muscles/physiology
2.
ScientificWorldJournal ; 2014: 287597, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24707200

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether chronic low back pain therapy with deep tissue massage (DTM) gives similar results to combined therapy consisting of DTM and non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). DESIGN: Prospective controlled randomized single blinded trial. SETTINGS: Ambulatory care of rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: 59 patients, age 51.8 ± 9.0 years, with chronic low back pain. Interventions. 2 weeks of DTM in the treatment group (TG) versus 2 weeks of DTM combined with NSAID in the control group (CG). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual analogue scale, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Roland-Morris questionnaire (RM). RESULTS: In both the TG and the CG, a significant pain reduction and function improvement were observed. VAS decreased from 58.3 ± 18.2 to 42.2 ± 21.1 (TG) and from 51.8 ± 18.8 to 30.6 ± 21.9 (CG). RM value decreased from 9.8 ± 5.1 to 6.4 ± 4.4 (TG), and from 9.3 ± 5.5 to 6.1 ± 4.6 (CG). ODI value decreased from 29.2 ± 17.3 to 21.4 ± 15.1 (TG) and from 21.4 ± 9.4 to 16.6 ± 9.4 (CG). All pre-post-treatment differences were significant; however, there was no significant difference between the TG and the CG. CONCLUSION: DTM had a positive effect on reducing pain in patients with chronic low back pain. Concurrent use of DTM and NSAID contributed to low back pain reduction in a similar degree that the DTM did.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Low Back Pain/therapy , Massage/methods , Pain Measurement/methods , Adult , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement/drug effects , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome
3.
Ginekol Pol ; 81(11): 851-5, 2010 Nov.
Article in Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21365902

ABSTRACT

Pain of lumbosacral segment of the vertebral column and the pelvis concerns about 45% of all pregnant women. The change of the body posture during pregnancy is the result of gravity centre relocation, which affects the musculosceletal system. Development of the joint, ligament and myofascial dysfunctions, as well as the pain in the lumbosacral segment and the pelvis, are the most common reasons of spine pain. The aim of this review is to present the current state of knowledge about lumbar spine pain in pregnant women with special focus on the pain connected with muscular, joint and ligament disorders. Pregnancy is a serious burden for the female osteo-skeletal system. Lumbar pain with different location and intensification is the negative consequence of the position changes during pregnancy. Pharmacotherapy could be useful only in cases of intensive low back pain, with possible application of small spectrum of drugs that are safe during pregnancy. Physical therapy including manual therapy exercises, massage and techniques of local anesthesia are alternative methods in case of low back pain in pregnant women.


Subject(s)
Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Low Back Pain/therapy , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiopathology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/therapy , Female , Humans , Low Back Pain/etiology , Lumbosacral Region/physiopathology , Manipulation, Chiropractic/methods , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/methods , Risk Assessment , Women's Health
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL