ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is an established option in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Pulse modulation, such as MOSES® technology, has recently been introduced and may offer potential advantages in HoLEP. METHODS: Perioperative data from 117 patients who underwent MOSES® laser enucleation of the prostate (MoLEP) were collected. Propensity score matching using prostate volume, age, body mass index (BMI), and anticoagulant intake was performed using a database of 237 patients treated with HoLEP. In total, 234 patients were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Prostate volume (104 vs. 102 ml), age (70 vs. 71 years), BMI (27 vs. 27), and anticoagulant intake (34 vs. 35%) did not differ significantly between the groups. There were no significant differences in operation time (61.5 vs. 58.1 min, p = 0.42), enucleation efficiency (2.5 vs. 2.6 g/min, p = 0.74), hemostasis time (7.8 vs. 8 min, p = 0.75) and hemoglobin drop (0.9 vs. 0.7 mg/dl, p = 0.48). The complication rates were low in both groups (16.2% for HoLEP and 17.1% for MoLEP). No differences were noted in the Clavien-Dindo Classification (p = 0.63) and the Comprehensive Complication Index (p = 0.24). The rate of complications > CDC IIIa was 0.9% for HoLEP (endoscopic coagulation) and 1.7% for MoLEP (2 cases of endoscopic coagulation). No transfusions were administered. CONCLUSION: Overall, the enucleation efficiency was high in both groups and the procedure time was short. HoLEP is an efficient and safe treatment option in experienced hands, regardless of the use of pulse modulation technology.
Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Lasers, Solid-State , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Transurethral Resection of Prostate , Male , Humans , Holmium , Propensity Score , Treatment Outcome , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Prostatic Hyperplasia/complications , Transurethral Resection of Prostate/methods , Laser Therapy/methods , AnticoagulantsABSTRACT
Purpose: To evaluate the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) for reporting complications in lower urinary tract transurethral procedures and compare it with the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). Materials and Methods: A total of 450 consecutive patients were included into the analyses [150 each of transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT), transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), and transurethral enucleation of the prostate using Tm:YAG, (ThuLEP)]. Complications were assessed according to the modified CDC. The CCI was calculated using a freely accessible online tool. Descriptive statistics and correlation analyses were applied to quantify operational differences and length of stay (LOS) between CDC and CCI. Sample size calculations for hypothetical clinical trials were contrasted for CDC and CCI application. Results: Overall n = 150 patients with complications (33.3%) within the first 60 days after operation were identified. Of these, n = 125 (83.4%) were minor complications up to CDC grade IIIa. Of patients with complications, n = 57 patients (12.6%) experienced more than one complication. Here, the cumulative CCI led to an upgrade of at least one CDC grade in 33 patients. Hence, in 22.0% of cases, the highest CDC grade underestimated the degree of complications. CCI showed higher correlation with LOS compared with CDC (all r > 0.2, all p-values ≤0.0001). Using CCI instead of CDC for sample calculation resulted in a strong reduction of the required number of patients for all three interventions (percentage of patient number decrease: -93.2% for TURBT, -71.8% for TURP, and -81.1% for ThuLEP). Conclusion: The CCI gives a more precise interpretation of the postinterventional complications of TURBT, TURP, and ThuLEP. CCI application may reduce the required sample size for clinical trials and will relieve their recruitment in the future.