Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
APMIS ; 128(1): 61-64, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31691353

ABSTRACT

Francisella tularensis is a zoonotic bacterium which causes the infection tularemia. It colonizes invertebrates and vertebrates, counting wildlife animals and rodents. Humans can become infected through several pathways including contaminated food, water, and handling animals and due to bites from vectors. Ticks are known to cause tularemia in humans, though their role as a disease transferring vector is not well understood. We describe two case reports of tularemia transferred by ticks on Southern Zealand, Denmark. Case 1: A 49-year-old woman presented with lymphadenopathy and an unhealed sifting wound after a tick bite. Serology tests for F. tularensis were initially negative but turned positive five weeks after symptom onset, when abscess drainage was performed. Gentamicin and ciprofloxacin treatment improved the patient's clinical condition, and she completely recovered. Case 2: A 74-year-old man presented with malaise, fever, and an abdominal ulcer allegedly caused after a vector bite. CRP and leukocytes were increased, while serology tests for F. tularensis were negative. Doxycycline treatment improved the patient's clinical condition, and he completely recovered. Three weeks after symptom onset, renewed serology tests for F. tularensis were positive.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Ticks/microbiology , Tularemia/diagnosis , Tularemia/transmission , Aged , Animals , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , Denmark , Doxycycline/therapeutic use , Female , Francisella tularensis , Humans , Lymphadenopathy/microbiology , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
2.
Microb Pathog ; 131: 150-157, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30965089

ABSTRACT

In this study, essential oil extracted from Syagrus coronata seeds (SCEO) was evaluated for antibacterial and antibiofilm activities against Staphylococcus aureus; in addition, Galleria mellonella model was used as an in vivo infection model. SCEO was mainly composed by fatty acids (89.79%) and sesquiterpenes (8.5%). The major components were octanoic acid, dodecanoic acid, decanoic acid and γ-eudesmol. SCEO showed bactericidal activity (minimal bactericidal concentration from 312 to 1250 µg/mL) against all tested S. aureus clinical isolates, which showed distinct biofilm-forming and multiple drug resistance phenotypes. SCEO weakly reduced biomass but remarkably decreased cell viability in pre-formed biofilms of S. aureus isolate UFPEDA-02 (ATCC-6538). Electron microscopy analysis showed that SCEO treatments decreased the number of bacterial cells (causing structural alterations) and lead to loss of the roughness in the multiple layers of the three-dimensional biofilm structure. In addition, overproduction of exopolymeric matrix was observed. SCEO at 31.2 mg/kg improved the survival of G. mellonela larvae inoculated with UFPEDA-02 isolate and reduced the bacterial load in hemolymph and melanization. In conclusion, SCEO is an antibacterial agent against S. aureus strains with different resistance phenotypes and able to disturb biofilm architecture. Our results show SCEO as a potential candidate to drug development.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Arecaceae/chemistry , Biofilms/drug effects , Lepidoptera/microbiology , Oils, Volatile/pharmacology , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Staphylococcus/drug effects , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Biofilms/growth & development , Brazil , Disease Models, Animal , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Microbial Viability/drug effects , Oils, Volatile/chemistry , Plant Extracts/chemistry , Seeds/chemistry , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/growth & development
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30319991

ABSTRACT

Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) is frequently isolated from sporadic cases of diarrhea and in outbreaks of gastroenteritis in several regions of the world. The pathophysiology of EAEC continues to be enigmatic, and the efficacy of antibiotic treatment in EAEC-associated diarrhea has been discussed. Since the level of antibiotic resistance is increasing, it is essential to restrict the use of antibiotics to prevent further resistance development. We aimed to investigate EAEC strains in adult Danish patients suffering from diarrhea and from healthy controls. We examined the antibiotic resistance in EAEC strains, the clinical response to antibiotic treatment in EAEC diarrheal cases, and the distribution of virulence genes in diarrheal cases. The EAEC strains were collected from patients suffering from diarrhea in a Danish multicenter study. A medical doctor interviewed the patients by using a questionnaire regarding gastrointestinal symptoms, exposures, and use of antibiotic and over-the-counter antidiarrheal drugs. Follow-up was performed after 3-5 months to inquire about differential diagnosis to gastrointestinal disease. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction characterized virulence genes in diarrheal cases. Finally, the level of antibiotic resistance was examined by using the disc diffusion method. Asymptomatic carriage of EAEC in the adult Danish population was rare, in contrast to findings in healthy Danish children. The duration of diarrhea was not shortened by antibiotic treatment, specifically ciprofloxacin treatment, or by over-the-counter antidiarrheal drugs. Follow-up revealed no pathology in diarrheal patients apart from irritable bowel syndrome in two patients. A high number of patients suffered from long-term diarrhea, which was associated with the enterotoxin EAST-1 and a high virulence factor score. A high level of antibiotic resistance was observed and 58% of the EAEC strains were multidrug resistant. Multidrug resistance was most pronounced in cases of travelers' diarrhea, and it was seen that antibiotic treatment did not reduce the duration of diarrhea.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Diarrhea/drug therapy , Diarrhea/microbiology , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Denmark , Diarrhea/pathology , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli Infections/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Virulence Factors/analysis , Virulence Factors/genetics
4.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 49(5): 573-578, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28366659

ABSTRACT

The Bacteroides fragilis group constitute a significant portion of the human gut microbiota and comprise a major proportion of anaerobic bacteria isolated in human infections. We established a baseline of antimicrobial susceptibility rates in the B. fragilis group in the intestinal tract of relatively antibiotic-naive healthy Danish children. From 174 faecal samples collected from children attending day care, 359 non-duplicate isolates were screened for antimicrobial susceptibility. Of these, 0.0%, 1.9%, 5.0% and 21.2% of isolates were intermediate-susceptible or resistant to metronidazole, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam and clindamycin, respectively. Eighteen additional studies reporting susceptibility rates in the B. fragilis group bacteria were identified by conducting a literature search. Heterogeneity among results from studies of B. fragilis group antimicrobial susceptibility rates in faecal microbiota exists.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteroides Infections/drug therapy , Bacteroides fragilis/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Microbiota/drug effects , Bacteroides Infections/microbiology , Child , Clindamycin/therapeutic use , Denmark , Feces/microbiology , Humans , Meropenem , Metronidazole/therapeutic use , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Penicillanic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Penicillanic Acid/therapeutic use , Piperacillin/therapeutic use , Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination , Surveys and Questionnaires , Thienamycins/therapeutic use
5.
Trials ; 17(1): 491, 2016 10 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27724923

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Maternal obesity is associated with increased risks of adverse pregnancy-related complications and outcomes for both mothers and infants. Overweight and obese women have an increased risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Infant Body Mass index (BMI) and the risk of obesity in adulthood are related to maternal gestational weight gain (GWG). Preventive lifestyle and dietary interventions are time-consuming and do not always reduce GWG or the risk of maternal pregnancy complications. Recent research has indicated that the gut microbiota may play a significant role in the development of obesity. Some studies have indicated that the daily consumption of probiotics may reduce the risk of preeclampsia, maintain serum insulin levels and reduce the frequency of GDM in pregnant women. The aims of this study are to investigate whether daily probiotic supplements in obese women during pregnancy can limit gestational weight gain, improve glucose homeostasis and thereby improve maternal, fetal and infant health outcomes. METHODS: A pilot study including 50 obese pregnant nulliparous women with a prepregnancy BMI of between 30 and 35 kg/m2 will be randomized to receive daily probiotics (four capsules of Vivomixx®; total of 450 billion CFU/day, including eight probiotic bacterial strains) or placebo from gestational age 14-20 weeks until delivery. The infants will be followed until 9 months of age. The women will be monitored by weight, blood, fecal, vaginal and urine samples, diet questionnaires and hospital record review. Primary outcomes are: maternal weight gain, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level and changes in glucose concentration measured during an oral glucose tolerance test. Secondary outcomes are: microbiota and inflammatory markers in mother and child, pregnancy complications, pregnancy outcomes, physical activity and the body composition of the neonate. DISCUSSION: We expect to find alterations in the metabolic profiles, microbiota and possibly pregnancy outcomes. From a clinical point of view the effects of Vivomixx® could control weight gain and reduce complications during pregnancy by inducing changes in the gut microbiota. Furthermore, this intervention during pregnancy could influence the infant's microbiota, which could have important implications for infant development and health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02508844 , registered on 11 May 2015.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Obesity/complications , Pregnancy Complications , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Blood Glucose/analysis , Double-Blind Method , Female , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pilot Projects , Pregnancy , Probiotics/adverse effects , Sample Size , Weight Gain
6.
J Crohns Colitis ; 8(11): 1498-505, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24972748

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease. The probiotic bacterium Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) has been used to maintain and induce clinical remission in UC. Our aim was to test the effect of Ciprofloxacin and/or orally administered EcN as add-on to conventional therapies in patients with active UC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our single center double-blinded randomized placebo controlled study included patients with a Colitis Activity Index (CAI) score of at least 6. Patients were randomized to Ciprofloxacin or placebo for 1week followed by EcN or placebo for 7weeks. All 4 treatments were given as add-on treatments. RESULTS: One hundred subjects with active UC were recruited. In the per-protocol analysis we, surprisingly, found that in the group receiving placebo/EcN fewer patients, 54%, reached remission compared to the group receiving placebo/placebo, 89%, p<0.05. Among patients treated with Cipro/placebo and Cipro/EcN, 78% and 66% reached remission, respectively. Furthermore, the group receiving placebo/EcN had the largest number of withdrawals, 11 of 25 (44%), compared to 15 of 75 (20%) in any of the other groups, p<0.05. Indication of lack of mucosal healing was found in the group treated with placebo/Nissle, since only 4 (29%) of the 14 patients, who completed the study, reported no blood in stools at week 12 (p<0.02), compared to 63%, 67% and 65% in groups treated with Cipro/Nissle, Cipro/placebo and placebo/placebo, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that there is no benefit in the use of E. coli Nissle as an add-on treatment to conventional therapies for active ulcerative colitis. Furthermore, treatment with E. coli Nissle without a previous antibiotic cure resulted in fewer patients reaching clinical remission.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Escherichia coli , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Intestinal Mucosa/drug effects , Male , Patient Dropouts , Placebos/therapeutic use , Remission Induction , Severity of Illness Index , Wound Healing
7.
PLoS One ; 6(8): e22823, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21853049

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: E. coli belonging to the phylogenetic group B2 are linked to Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Studies have shown that antimicrobials have some effect in the treatment of IBD, and it has been demonstrated that E. coli Nissle has prophylactic abilities comparable to 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) therapy in ulcerative colitis. The objective of this study was to test if ciprofloxacin and/or E. coli Nissle could eradicate IBD associated E. coli in the streptomycin-treated mouse intestine. RESULTS: After successful colonization with the IBD associated E. coli strains in mice the introduction of E. coli Nissle did not result in eradication of either IBD associated strains or an E. coli from a healthy control, instead, co-colonization at high levels were obtained. Treatment of mice, precolonized with IBD associated E. coli, with ciprofloxacin for three days alone apparently resulted in effective eradication of tested E. coli. However, treatment of precolonized mice with a combination of ciprofloxacin for 3 days followed by E. coli Nissle surprisingly allowed one IBD associated E. coli to re-colonize the mouse intestine, but at a level 3 logs under E. coli Nissle. A prolonged treatment with ciprofloxacin for 7 days did not change this outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In the mouse model E. coli Nissle can not be used alone to eradicate IBD associated E. coli; rather, 3 days of ciprofloxacin are apparently efficient in eradicating these strains, but surprisingly, after ciprofloxacin treatment (3 or 7 days), the introduction of E. coli Nissle may support re-colonization with IBD associated E. coli.


Subject(s)
Ciprofloxacin/pharmacology , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/microbiology , Intestines/microbiology , Streptomycin/pharmacology , Animals , Colony Count, Microbial , Drug Therapy, Combination , Escherichia coli/growth & development , Female , Intestines/drug effects , Intestines/pathology , Mice , Streptomycin/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL