Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 315(9): 2683-2687, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37222796

ABSTRACT

In 2022, National Comprehensive Cancer Network updated the phrase of "complete circumferential peripheral and deep margin assessment (CCPDMA)" to "peripheral and deep en face margin assessment (PDEMA)," which was meant to create more consistency across all treatment modalities and provide clarity to the meaning of total margin evaluation. The aim of this project was to investigate the interpretation of PDEMA across pertinent specialties and to identify any existing knowledge gaps in hopes of improving clinical performance of institutional practice. An electronic survey was administered to medical professionals within the divisions of dermatology and otolaryngology retrieving demographic data and assessing respondents' knowledge on tissue processing techniques and PDEMA. Of the four knowledge-based assessment questions administered, dermatology respondents answered three questions with > 80% accuracy and one question with < 65% accuracy. Otolaryngology respondents answered one question with > 80% accuracy and three with < 65% accuracy. Both groups answered the knowledge-based question evaluating the concept of "what must be true for Mohs or PDEMA to have value" with under 65% accuracy. When comparing dermatology and otolaryngology respondents, only one question which evaluated the proper methods to "achieve processing of the epidermal edge and the base of the tumor along a single plane in the lab" significantly differed between groups, with a percentage correct of 96% for dermatologists compared to 54% for otolaryngologists (p < 0.001). Results were found to be similar when resident physicians were removed from analysis. The overall percent correct for knowledge-based questions was shifted higher for dermatologists compared to otolaryngologists (p = 0.014). This trend was also redemonstrated when analyzing the data excluding residents (p = 0.053).


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Basal Cell , Otolaryngology , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/pathology , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol ; 316(2): R157-R164, 2019 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30521366

ABSTRACT

Measurements of aldosterone for diagnosis of primary aldosteronism are usually made from blood sampled in the morning when aldosterone typically peaks. We tested the relative contributions and interacting influences of the circadian system, ongoing behaviors, and prior sleep to this morning peak in aldosterone. To determine circadian rhythmicity and separate effects of behaviors on aldosterone, 16 healthy participants completed a 5-day protocol in dim light while all behaviors ranging from sleep to exercise were standardized and scheduled evenly across the 24-h circadian period. In another experiment, to test the separate effects of prior nocturnal sleep or the inactivity that accompanies sleep on aldosterone, 10 healthy participants were studied across 2 nights: 1 with sleep and 1 with maintained wakefulness (randomized order). Plasma aldosterone was measured repeatedly in each experiment. Aldosterone had a significant endogenous rhythm ( P < 0.001), rising across the circadian night and peaking in the morning (~8 AM). Activity, including exercise, increased aldosterone, and different behaviors modulated aldosterone differently across the circadian cycle (circadian phase × behavior interaction; P < 0.001). In the second experiment, prior nocturnal sleep and prior rested wakefulness both increased plasma aldosterone ( P < 0.001) in the morning, to the same extent as the change in circadian phases between evening and morning. The morning increase in aldosterone is due to effects of the circadian system plus increased morning activities and not prior sleep or the inactivity accompanying sleep. These findings have implications for the time of and behaviors preceding measurement of aldosterone, especially under conditions of shift work and jet lag.


Subject(s)
Aldosterone/blood , Behavior/physiology , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Wakefulness/physiology , Adult , Body Temperature/physiology , Exercise/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sleep/physiology , Time Factors
3.
J Inherit Metab Dis ; 40(6): 831-843, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28871440

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Observational reports suggest that supplementation that increases citric acid cycle intermediates via anaplerosis may have therapeutic advantages over traditional medium-chain triglyceride (MCT) treatment of long-chain fatty acid oxidation disorders (LC-FAODs) but controlled trials have not been reported. The goal of our study was to compare the effects of triheptanoin (C7), an anaplerotic seven-carbon fatty acid triglyceride, to trioctanoin (C8), an eight-carbon fatty acid triglyceride, in patients with LC-FAODs. METHODS: A double blinded, randomized controlled trial of 32 subjects with LC-FAODs (carnitine palmitoyltransferase-2, very long-chain acylCoA dehydrogenase, trifunctional protein or long-chain 3-hydroxy acylCoA dehydrogenase deficiencies) who were randomly assigned a diet containing 20% of their total daily energy from either C7 or C8 for 4 months was conducted. Primary outcomes included changes in total energy expenditure (TEE), cardiac function by echocardiogram, exercise tolerance, and phosphocreatine recovery following acute exercise. Secondary outcomes included body composition, blood biomarkers, and adverse events, including incidence of rhabdomyolysis. RESULTS: Patients in the C7 group increased left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction by 7.4% (p = 0.046) while experiencing a 20% (p = 0.041) decrease in LV wall mass on their resting echocardiogram. They also required a lower heart rate for the same amount of work during a moderate-intensity exercise stress test when compared to patients taking C8. There was no difference in TEE, phosphocreatine recovery, body composition, incidence of rhabdomyolysis, or any secondary outcome measures between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: C7 improved LV ejection fraction and reduced LV mass at rest, as well as lowering heart rate during exercise among patients with LC-FAODs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01379625.


Subject(s)
Caprylates/therapeutic use , Cardiomyopathies/drug therapy , Fatty Acids/metabolism , Lipid Metabolism, Inborn Errors/drug therapy , Mitochondrial Myopathies/drug therapy , Mitochondrial Trifunctional Protein/deficiency , Nervous System Diseases/drug therapy , Rhabdomyolysis/drug therapy , Triglycerides/therapeutic use , Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase, Long-Chain/metabolism , Adolescent , Adult , Cardiomyopathies/metabolism , Carnitine/metabolism , Child , Dietary Fats/metabolism , Double-Blind Method , Exercise/physiology , Female , Humans , Lipid Metabolism, Inborn Errors/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Mitochondrial Myopathies/metabolism , Mitochondrial Trifunctional Protein/metabolism , Nervous System Diseases/metabolism , Oxidation-Reduction , Rhabdomyolysis/metabolism , Young Adult
4.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 141(3): 1909, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28372056

ABSTRACT

Binaural pitch fusion is the fusion of dichotically presented tones that evoke different pitches between the ears. In normal-hearing (NH) listeners, the frequency range over which binaural pitch fusion occurs is usually <0.2 octaves. Recently, broad fusion ranges of 1-4 octaves were demonstrated in bimodal cochlear implant users. In the current study, it was hypothesized that hearing aid (HA) users would also exhibit broad fusion. Fusion ranges were measured in both NH and hearing-impaired (HI) listeners with hearing losses ranging from mild-moderate to severe-profound, and relationships of fusion range with demographic factors and with diplacusis were examined. Fusion ranges of NH and HI listeners averaged 0.17 ± 0.13 octaves and 1.7 ± 1.5 octaves, respectively. In HI listeners, fusion ranges were positively correlated with a principal component measure of the covarying factors of young age, early age of hearing loss onset, and long durations of hearing loss and HA use, but not with hearing threshold, amplification level, or diplacusis. In NH listeners, no correlations were observed with age, hearing threshold, or diplacusis. The association of broad fusion with early onset, long duration of hearing loss suggests a possible role of long-term experience with hearing loss and amplification in the development of broad fusion.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Pitch Perception , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Auditory Threshold , Dichotic Listening Tests , Female , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/psychology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pitch Discrimination , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL