Dual-energy CT lung perfusion in systemic sclerosis: preliminary experience in 101 patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate lung perfusion in systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: The study population included 101 patients who underwent dual-energy CT (DECT) in the follow-up of SSc with pulmonary function tests obtained within 2 months. Fifteen patients had right heart catheterization-proven PH. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients had no SSc-related lung involvement (Group A), 56 patients had SSc-related interstitial lung disease (Group B) of variable extent (Group B mild: ≤ 10% of lung parenchyma involved: n = 17; Group B moderate: between 11 and 50%: n = 31; Group B severe: > 50%: n = 8), and 8 patients had PVOD/PCH (Group C). Lung perfusion was abnormal in 8 patients in Group A (21.6%), 14 patients in Group B (25%), and 7 patients in Group C (87.5%). In Group A and Group B mild (n = 54), (a) patients with abnormal lung perfusion (n = 14; 26%) had a higher proportion of NYHA III/IV scores of dyspnea (7 [50%] vs 7 [17.5%]; p = 0.031) and a shorter mean walking distance at the 6MWT (397.0 [291.0; 466.0] vs 495.0 [381.0; 549.0]; p = 0.042) but no evidence of difference in the DLCO% predicted (61.0 [53.0; 67.0] vs 68.0 [61.0; 78.0]; p = 0.055) when compared to patients with normal lung perfusion (n = 40; 74%); (b) a negative correlation was found between the iodine concentration in both lungs and the DLCO% predicted but it did not reach statistical significance (r = -0.27; p = 0.059) and no correlation was found with the PAPs (r = 0.16; p = 0.29) and walking distance during the 6MWT (r = -0.029; p = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: DECT lung perfusion provides complementary information to standard HRCT scans, depicting perfusion changes in SSc patients with normal or minimally infiltrated lung parenchyma. KEY POINTS: • In a retrospective observational study of 101 consecutive patients with SSc, dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography was obtained to evaluate lung perfusion. • Lung perfusion was abnormal in 14 out of 54 patients (26%) with no or mild SSc-related lung infiltration. • Patients with abnormal perfusion and no or mild SSc-related lung infiltration had more severe scores of dyspnea and shorter walking distance than patients with similar lung findings and normal perfusion, suggesting the presence of small vessel vasculopathy.

Gene/environment interaction in the susceptibility of Crohn's disease patients to aluminum.

BACKGROUND & AIM: The key role of environmental factors in the pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) is recognized. Aluminum is suspected to be a risk factor for IBD. However, mechanisms linking aluminum exposure to disease development are unknown. We examined the role of aluminum transport and subcellular localisation on human colon susceptibility to aluminum-induced inflammation. METHODS: Human colon biopsies isolated from Crohn's disease (CD) or control patients and Caco-2 cells were incubated with aluminum. The effects of aluminum were evaluated on cytokine secretion and transporter expression. The role of aluminum kinetics parameters was studied in Caco-2 using transport inhibitors and in human colon biopsies by assessing genetic polymorphisms of transporters. RESULTS: Aluminum exposure was shown to induce cytokine secretion in colon of CD but not healthy patients. In Caco-2 cells, aluminum internalisation was correlated with inflammatory status. In human colon, analysis of genetic polymorphisms and expression of ABCB1 and SLC26A3 transporters showed that their decreased activity was involved in aluminum-induced inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: We hypothesize that alteration in detoxifying response would lead to a deregulation of intestinal homeostasis and to the expression of IBD. Our study emphasizes the complexity of gene/environment interaction for aluminum adverse health effect, highlighting at risk populations or subtypes of patients. A better understanding of correlations between gene expression or SNP and xenobiotic kinetics parameters would shift the medical paradigm to more personalized disease management and treatment.

Dedicated call center (SOS-HAE) for hereditary angioedema attacks: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of guidelines for the specific treatment of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks, HAE morbidity and mortality rates remain substantial. HAE attacks are a major medical issue requiring specific treatment as well as a considerable socio-economic burden. We report a protocol designed to test whether a dedicated call centre is more effective than usual practice in the management of patients experiencing an HAE attack. METHODS/DESIGN: This prospective, cluster-randomised, single-blind, parallel-group, multicentre trial evaluates the morbidity and consequent socio-economic costs of the management of patients experiencing an HAE attack by a dedicated call centre as compared to usual practice. The trial aims to recruit 200 patients. Patients in the intervention arm are provided with an SOS-HAE card with the call centre's freephone number that they can access in the case of an attack. The centre's mission is to provide recommended expert advice on early home treatment. The centre can route the call to a local emergency medical service with competency in HAE management or even arrange for the drugs needed for the specific treatment of an HAE attack to be sent to the emergency department of the local hospital. The primary outcome measure is the number of hospital admissions for an HAE attack. Each patient will be followed up every 2 months for 2 years. The study has been approved by the ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes d'Ile de France 10; registration number: 2012-A00044-39; date of approval: 19 January 2012). DISCUSSION: The SOS-HAE protocol has been designed to address the handling of attacks experienced by patients with HAE in the home. The proposed trial will determine whether the setting up of a dedicated call centre is more effective than usual practice in terms of reducing morbidity as given by the numbers of hospital admissions. The results are also anticipated to have important implications in terms of socio-economic costs for both healthcare services and patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01679912 .