Coronary CT Angiography CAD-RADS versus Coronary Artery Calcium Score in Patients with Acute Chest Pain.

Background The Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) was established in 2016 to standardize the reporting of coronary artery disease at coronary CT angiography (CCTA). Purpose To assess the prognostic value of CAD-RADS at CCTA for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. Materials and Methods This multicenter retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at four qualifying university teaching hospitals. Patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain underwent CCTA between January 2010 and December 2017. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors for MACEs, including clinical factors, coronary artery calcium score (CACS), and CAD-RADS categories. The prognostic value compared with clinical risk factors and CACS was also assessed. Results A total of 1492 patients were evaluated (mean age, 58 years ± 14 years [standard deviation]; 759 men). During a median follow-up period of 31.5 months, 103 of the 1492 patients (7%) experienced MACEs. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that a moderate to severe CACS was associated with MACEs after adjusting for clinical risk factors (hazard ratio [HR] range, 2.3-4.4; P value range, <.001 to <.01). CAD-RADS categories from 3 to 4 or 5 (HR range, 3.2-8.5; P < .001) and high-risk plaques (HR = 3.6, P < .001) were also associated with MACEs. The C statistics revealed that the CAD-RADS score improved risk stratification more than that using clinical risk factors alone or combined with CACS (C-index, 0.85 vs 0.63 [P < .001] and 0.76 [P < .01], respectively). Conclusion The Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System classification had an incremental prognostic value compared with the coronary artery calcium score in the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Vliegenthart in this issue.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Preoperative Lung Localization for Pulmonary Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: An optimal method of preoperative localization for pulmonary nodules has yet to be established. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the success and complication rates associated with three pulmonary nodule localization methods for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS): hook-wire localization, microcoil localization, and lipiodol localization. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases for prospective or retrospective English language studies of VATS localization in adult patients. A noncomparative, random effects model-based meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled success and complication rates for the three localization methods. RESULTS: A total of 46 clinical studies were enrolled, including 30, 9, and 7 studies of hook-wire, microcoil, and lipiodol localization, respectively. The successful targeting rates for hook-wire, microcoil, and lipiodol localization were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-0.99), 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99), and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00), respectively, with corresponding successful operative field targeting rates of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91-0.96), 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98), and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00), respectively. In addition, the successful VATS rates with hook-wire, microcoil, and lipiodol localization were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.97), 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99), and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00), respectively. Regarding complications, hook-wire, microcoil, and lipiodol localization were associated with pneumothorax rates of 0.35 (95% CI, 0.28-0.43), 0.16 (95% CI, 0.07-0.34), and 0.31 (95% CI, 0.20-0.46), respectively and hemorrhage rates of 0.16 (95% CI, 0.11-0.23), 0.06 (95% CI, 0.03-0.11), and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.05-0.23), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All three localization methods yielded similarly highly successful targeting rates. However, hook-wire localization had a relatively lower successful operative field targeting rate because of dislodgement or migration. Lipiodol localization had the highest overall success rate, and microcoil localization yielded the lowest complication rates.

Lipiodol lOcalization for Ground-glass opacity mInimal Surgery: Rationale and design of the LOGIS trial.

OBJECTIVES: The diagnosis and treatment of ground-glass opacity (GGO) lesions have become important issues because subsolid nodules including GGO are known to frequently represent the histologic spectrum of lung adenocarcinoma. Because small GGO lesions cannot usually be palpated or visualized during surgery, several marking techniques have been reported for localization during thoracoscopic surgery, such as lipiodol and hook-wire localization. This study is designed to demonstrate the usefulness and safety of the lipiodol localization technique for individuals undergoing GGO VATS resection compared to the hook-wire localization technique. METHODS: Two hundred fifty participants will be prospectively enrolled in a 1:1 manner to the lipiodol or hook-wire group according to the inclusion criteria. All study participants will undergo preoperative lung localization using either the lipiodol or hook-wire method. Thoracoscopic surgery will be performed by experienced thoracoscopic surgeons within several hours after marking under general anesthesia. The primary endpoint is the procedure success rate, and the secondary endpoints are the procedure complication rate, procedure time, surgery time and the margin from the lesion in the resected specimen. RESULTS: Patient enrollment will be completed within 2years. We will analyze the procedure success rate and the presence of complications with regard to the CT results. In addition, the procedure and surgery times, and the safety margin will be also compared between the 2 techniques. CONCLUSION: If the aims of this study are achieved, then the use of lipiodol localization technique will be widespread in the localization of non-palpable pulmonary lesions that are indicated for surgical resection. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02180568).