[Anatomy of the left ventricle for endocardial ablation]. / Anatomie des linken Ventrikels als Grundlage für endokardiale Ablationen.

As with all cardiac interventions, performing left ventricular ablation requires profound knowledge of cardiac anatomy. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of left ventricular anatomy and to characterize complex and clinically relevant structures from an electrophysiologist-centered perspective. In addition to the different access routes, the trabecular network, the left ventricular outflow tract, and the left ventricular conduction system, complex anatomical structures such as the aortomitral continuity and the left ventricular summit are also explained. In addition, this article offers multiple clinical examples that combine ECG, anatomy, and electrophysiologic study.

Safe electrophysiologic profile of dexmedetomidine in different experimental arrhythmia models.

Previous studies suggest an impact of dexmedetomidine on cardiac electrophysiology. However, experimental data is sparse. Therefore, purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of dexmedetomidine on different experimental models of proarrhythmia. 50 rabbit hearts were explanted and retrogradely perfused. The first group (n = 12) was treated with dexmedetomidine in ascending concentrations (3, 5 and 10 µM). Dexmedetomidine did not substantially alter action potential duration (APD) but reduced spatial dispersion of repolarization (SDR) and rendered the action potentials rectangular, resulting in no proarrhythmia. In further 12 hearts, erythromycin (300 µM) was administered to simulate long-QT-syndrome-2 (LQT2). Additional treatment with dexmedetomidine reduced SDR, thereby suppressing torsade de pointes. In the third group (n = 14), 0.5 µM veratridine was added to reduce the repolarization reserve. Further administration of dexmedetomidine did not influence APD, SDR or the occurrence of arrhythmias. In the last group (n = 12), a combination of acetylcholine (1 µM) and isoproterenol (1 µM) was used to facilitate atrial fibrillation. Additional treatment with dexmedetomidine prolonged the atrial APD but did not reduce AF episodes. In this study, dexmedetomidine did not significantly alter cardiac repolarization duration and was not proarrhythmic in different models of ventricular and atrial arrhythmias. Of note, dexmedetomidine might be antiarrhythmic in acquired LQT2 by reducing SDR.

Occurrence of primarily noninducible atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia after radiofrequency delivery in the slow pathway region during empirical slow pathway modulation.

BACKGROUND: The first-line therapy for atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) is catheter-based slow pathway modulation. If AVNRT is not inducible during an electrophysiological study, an empirical slow pathway modulation (ESPM) may be considered in patients with dual atrioventricular nodal physiology and/or a typical electrocardiogram (ECG). METHODS: We screened 149 symptomatic patients who underwent ESPM in our department between 1993 and 2013. All patients fulfilled the following criteria: (1) either dual atrioventricular nodal (AVN) physiology with up to 2 AVN echo beats or characteristic ECG documentation or both, (2) noninducibility of AVNRT by programmed stimulation, and (3) completion of a telephone questionnaire for long-term follow-up. Out of this population we retrospectively investigated 13 patients who were primarily noninducible but in whom an AVNRT occurred during or after radiofrequency (RF) delivery. RESULTS: When AVNRT occurred, the procedure lost its empirical character, and RF delivery was continued until the procedural endpoint of noninducibility of AVNRT. This endpoint was reached in all but one patient (92%). After a follow-up of 73 ± 15 months, this patient was the only one who reported no benefit from the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Out of 149 initially noninducible patients, a considerable number (9%) exhibited AVNRT during or after RF delivery. These patients crossed over from empirical to controlled slow pathway modulation resulting in a good clinical outcome. Our observations should encourage electrophysiologists to repeat programmed stimulation even after initial empirical RF delivery to retest for inducibility.

Colchicine Increases Ventricular Vulnerability in an Experimental Whole-Heart Model.

The traditional gout medication colchicine has been reported to effectively prevent atrial fibrillation recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation or cardiac surgery in a few clinical trials. Severe adverse events have not yet been reported. The aim of the present study was to assess possible direct electrophysiological effects in an experimental whole-heart model. Ten rabbit hearts were isolated and Langendorff-perfused. Thereafter, colchicine was administered in two concentrations (1 and 3 µM). Eight endo- and epicardial monophasic action potentials and a 12-lead ECG showed a stable QT interval and action potential duration during colchicine infusion. Furthermore, there was no significant increase in dispersion of repolarization. However, colchicine induced a dose-dependent significant decrease of effective refractory period (ERP; 1 µM: -19 ms, 3 µM: -22 ms; p < 0.05). In the present study, acute infusion of colchicine in isolated rabbit hearts resulted in a reduction of ERP in the presence of a stable myocardial repolarization. This led to a significantly elevated inducibility of ventricular fibrillation. In 4 of 10 hearts, incessant ventricular fibrillation occurred. These results suggest a pro-arrhythmic or toxic effect of colchicine and underline that further clinical studies on potential adverse effects should be conducted before the drug can be recommended for routine use after atrial fibrillation ablation.