Oral intake of bucillamine, carvedilol, metformin, or phenformin does not protect against UVR-induced squamous cell carcinomas in hairless mice.

Squamous cell carcinoma represents the second most common type of keratinocyte carcinoma with ultraviolet radiation (UVR) making up the primary risk factor. Oral photoprotection aims to reduce incidence rates through oral intake of photoprotective compounds. Recently, drug repurposing has gained traction as an interesting source of chemoprevention. Because of their reported photoprotective properties, we investigated the potential of bucillamine, carvedilol, metformin, and phenformin as photoprotective compounds following oral intake in UVR-exposed hairless mice. Tumour development was observed in all groups in response to UVR, with only the positive control (Nicotinamide) demonstrating a reduction in tumour incidence (23.8%). No change in tumour development was observed in the four repurposed drug groups compared to the UV control group, whereas nicotinamide significantly reduced carcinogenesis (P = 0.00012). Metformin treatment significantly reduced UVR-induced erythema (P = 0.012), bucillamine and phenformin increased dorsal pigmentation (P = 0.0013, and P = 0.0005), but no other photoprotective effect was observed across the repurposed groups. This study demonstrates that oral supplementation with bucillamine, carvedilol, metformin, or phenformin does not affect UVR-induced carcinogenesis in hairless mice.

Experimental and approved treatments for skin photosensitivity in individuals with erythropoietic protoporphyria or X-linked protoporphyria: A systematic review.

Erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP) and X-linked protoporphyria (XLP) are characterized by skin photosensitivity caused by accumulation of protoporphyrin IX. We aimed to review the clinical evidence of efficacy and safety of skin photosensitivity treatments in individuals with EPP or XLP. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. A total of 40 studies with data on 18 treatment modalities were included. Comprehensive treatment safety data were obtained from the European Medicines Agency and the United States Food and Drug Administration. The studies used different outcome measures to evaluate the sensitivity without a generally accepted method to assess treatment effect on skin photosensitivity. Of the included studies, 13 were controlled trials. Gathered, the trials showed moderate positive effect of inorganic sunscreen application and subcutaneous implant of afamelanotide and no effect of organic sunscreen application, or oral treatment with beta-carotene, cysteine, N-acetylcysteine, vitamin C, or warfarin. Studies without control groups suggested treatment effect of foundation cream, dihydroxyacetone/lawsone cream, narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy, erythrocyte transfusion, extracorporeal erythrocyte photodynamic therapy, or oral treatment with zinc sulphate, terfenadine, cimetidine, or canthaxanthin, but the real effect is uncertain. Assessment of treatment effect on photosensitivity in patients with EPP or XLP carries a high risk of bias since experienced photosensitivity varies with both weather conditions, exposure pattern, and pigmentation. Controlled trials of promising treatment options are important although challenging in this small patient population.

High Oral Vitamin D3 Intake Does Not Protect Against UVR-induced Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Mice.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The effect of vitamin D on skin carcinogenesis is unclear. Vitamin D derivatives may protect against ultraviolet radiation (UVR)-induced DNA damage, immune suppression, and skin carcinogenesis. However, some epidemiological studies have reported an increased incidence of skin cancer associated with high serum vitamin D levels. We investigated the effect of vitamin D supplementation on serum, skin, and tumor vitamin D levels and on skin cancer development in hairless immunocompetent mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Female C3.Cg-Hrhr/TifBomTac immunocompetent mice (n=125) were randomly separated into five groups. Two groups received a high vitamin D3 diet (4.5 µg/day/mouse). One group received a medium vitamin D3 diet (2.3 µg/day/mouse). Two groups received a standard diet (0.045 µg/day/mouse). Three standard erythema doses of UVR were given three times per week to three groups. RESULTS: Animals on a high vitamin D3 diet had ~150-fold higher serum vitamin D3 levels (p=0.00016) and 3-fold higher serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)D3] levels (p=0.00016) than those on a standard diet. For mice on the medium vitamin D3 diet, serum vitamin D3 and 25(OH)D3 levels were 18-fold and 2.3-fold higher than for the standard diet, respectively (p=0.00016). All UVR-exposed mice developed tumors. Vitamin D3 levels were lower in the tumor than the skin (p<0.0001). High and medium supplementation with vitamin D3 did not affect tumor development (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: In mice, vitamin D levels in the serum, skin, and tumors were augmented by supplementation, but this did not affect the development of UVR-induced skin tumors.

The effect of vitamin D recommendations on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level in patients with erythropoietic protoporphyria.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP) avoid sun exposure owing to photosensitivity. For decades, sun-avoiding Danes have been recommended daily vitamin D supplements all year. We offered our EPP patients serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) monitoring, and counseling if their level was low. We aimed to investigate the effect of the general recommendation and counseling on 25(OH)D status in patients attending our clinic. Additionally, the 25(OH)D status of our EPP patients was compared to that of British patients with EPP not taking vitamin D supplements and with that of the general Danish population. METHODS: Forty-six Danish patients with EPP had 25(OH)D measured in 721 blood samples collected between 2003 and 2021. Dates of individual counseling were noted. Data on British patients with EPP and the general Danish population were extracted from previous publications. RESULTS: Our patients had higher 25(OH)D levels than British patients with EPP not taking vitamin D supplements, but the recommendations did not elevate their 25(OH)D levels to that of the general Danish population. Overall, 17.5% of the 25(OH)D measurements in our EPP patients were below 30 nmol/L (deficiency) and 29.4% were between 30 and 50 nmol/L (insufficiency). Patients were monitored for a median of 11 y. Thirty-one patients had a total of 74 vitamin D counseling sessions, providing an increase in 25(OH)D of about 18 nmol/L the year after. However, many patients repeatedly developed insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents the positive effect of vitamin D recommendations on serum 25(OH)D in patients with EPP. Follow-up on vitamin D status and recommendations is essential to increase 25(OH)D levels.

Efficacy and Safety of Laser-Assisted Combination Chemotherapy: An Explorative Imaging-Guided Treatment With 5-Fluorouracil and Cisplatin for Basal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Rising incidences of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) have increased the need for effective topical therapies. By enhancing cutaneous uptake of the chemotherapeutic agents, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), laser-assisted delivery may provide a new combination treatment for BCC. Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate tumor response, safety, and drug biodistribution in tumors and blood after topical laser-assisted 5-FU + CIS treatment in BCC patients. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: This open-label, proof-of-concept trial investigated laser-assisted combination cisplatin + 5-FU treatment in 20 patients with histologically verified, low-risk superficial or nodular BCCs on the face (<20 mm) or trunk/extremities (<50 mm). After tumor demarcation guided by optical coherence tomography (OCT), BCCs were exposed to ablative fractional CO2 laser followed by 60 minutes topical cisplatin solution and 7-day exposure to 5% 5-FU cream under occlusion. After 30 days, treatment was repeated if any tumor residual was identified. Tumor response at day 30 and month 3 was assessed clinically as well as by OCT, reflectance confocal microscopy, and ultrasound, supplemented by histological verification at 3 months. Local skin reactions (LSRs) and side effects were evaluated on days 1, 3-5, 14, 30, and month 3. Drug detection in tumors and blood was performed in a subset of patients 1- and 24 hours after treatment. RESULTS: Nineteen patients completed the trial, with 32% (6/19) receiving a single treatment and 68% (13/19) treated twice. At 3 months, clinical clearance was seen in 18/19 patients with a corresponding 94% (17/18) achieving histological clearance. Baseline tumor thickness and subtype did not influence treatment number or clearance rate (P ≥ 0.61). LSRs were well-tolerated and consisted of erythema, edema, and erosion, followed by crusting by day 14. Erythema declined gradually by month 3, with 94% of patients and 79% of physicians rating cosmesis as "good" or "excellent." Scarring or hyperpigmentation was noted in 50% and 56%, respectively, while pain and infection were not observed during the follow-up period. Although chemotherapy uptake was visualized extending to deep skin layers, no systemic exposure to cisplatin or 5-FU was detected in patient blood. CONCLUSION: Laser-assisted cisplatin + 5-FU shows potential as an effective and tolerable treatment option for low-risk BCC, particularly in instances where self-application is not possible or where in-office, non-surgical therapy is preferred. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Photocarcinogenicity of selected topically applied dermatological drugs: calcineurin inhibitors, corticosteroids, and vitamin D analogs.

Topical therapies constitute the mainstay of dermatological treatments for skin disorders, such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, psoriasis, or acne. Since some of these diseases are often chronic, treatment duration may last for years and may even last the patient's entire lifetime. Obviously, such long-term therapy may raise safety concerns, which also include the potential photocarcinogenic effect. Most patients are exposed to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) during leisure, work, vacations, or in tanning beds. Additionally, the patients may receive UVR via UVB phototherapy or psoralens plus UVA radiation (PUVA). The use of immunosuppressant's, such as corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors, has markedly increased. Patients with skin diseases have benefited from both systemic and topical treatment of both new and established drugs. The issue of a black box warning by the US Food and Drug Administration has increased concerns about photocarcinogenesis, which raises the question: "Are these drugs safe?" This review focuses on the mechanism of action and photocarcinogenic potential of commonly used topical treatments, such as corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and vitamin D analogs.