Assessing the efficacy and safety of Yinqiao powder-maxing Ganshi decoction in the treatment of the major symptoms of mild and moderate COVID-19 by telemedicine-study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Background: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the largest global epidemic in recent time. Chinese medicine has been recognized by the World Health Organization as an effective treatment for COVID-19, but there is still a lack of high-quality randomized, double-blind trials using placebo as the control to support its application, which may hinder its further promotion locally and internationally. Objectives: This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Yinqiao Powder-Maxing Ganshi Decoction with variation in relieving major symptoms of mild and moderate COVID-19 by telemedicine. Methods and design: This clinical study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that applies telemedicine to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Yinqiao Powder-Maxing Ganshi Decoction in the treatment of mild and moderate COVID-19. Eligible subjects will be randomly divided into either treatment or placebo groups for up to 14 days after stratification according to age (A:18-49, B:50-65) and the number of vaccinations (a: ≥3 doses, b: ≤2 doses). The treatment group will receive Yinqiao Powder-Maxing Ganshi Decoction granules along with certain variation based on their symptoms, and the placebo group will receive the same amount of placebo granules. Subjects will be prescribed different additions based on their symptoms and pathogenesis at the inclusion. The oral temperature, oximeter, result of rapid antigen test and symptom score will be recorded by subjects until they have stopped the medication. Subjects are required to have follow-up assessment by video-conference on days 7, 14 and 35. The time for the body temperature returning to normal will be used as the primary outcome. Discussion: This trial will provide scientific evidence on the use of Yinqiao Powder-Maxing Ganshi Decoction for the treatment of COVID-19, and the results would help raise the awareness in Hong Kong and the international community on the use of Chinese herbal medicine for treating COVID-19. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT05787327.

Efficacy and safety of modified Xiao-Feng Powder in the treatment of chronic urticaria: protocol of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic Urticaria (CU), a common skin disorder known as Yin Zhen in Chinese medicine, is characterized by recurrent, pruritic, pink-to-red edematous lesions and wheals on the skin. Xiao-Feng Powder (XFP, meaning Wind-Dispersing Powder), is reported to be one of the most frequently used Chinese herbal formulae for CU. In this study, we aim to investigate the effectiveness and safety of modified Xiao-Feng Powder (mXFP) for the treatment of CU. METHODS: In this randomised double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial, 58 subjects identified as having mild to severe urticaria (Urticaria activity score greater than 10) will be recruited and randomised into two groups to receive antihistamine Bilastine with either mXFP or placebo for 12 weeks, followed by post treatment visits at week 16. The primary outcome measure is the change of weekly urticaria activity score (UAS7) at week 12. Secondary outcome measures include the Urticaria Control Test (UCT), Visual Analog Scale of Itch Severity (VAS), Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire (CU-Q2oL), Angioedema Activity Score (AAS), immunoglobulin E (IgE) test, gut microbiota test and use of antihistamines during study period. The trial will be conducted at three Chinese medicine clinics in Hong Kong. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: The results of this study will establish robust clinical evidence about the efficacy and safety of mXFP in the treatment of CU. A specific feature of this trial is that it is a integrative medicine trial with subjects being allowed to take the Western and Chinese medicine together for the treatment. Trial registration This is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT04967092. Register date: July 19, 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04967092 .

A Chinese Medicine Formula (Bushen Huoxue Tongluo) for the Treatment of Chronic Subjective Tinnitus: A Study Protocol for a Pilot, Assessor-Blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: Tinnitus is a common problem worldwide. There is still no effective method to cure it. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) may be a potentially effective treatment approach for tinnitus. However, there is still no clinical trial with scientifically rigorous methodology to evaluate the treatment effect of TCM for tinnitus. Therefore, we propose a pilot study to inform the feasibility of a future full-scale RCT to establish the efficacy of TCM formula for tinnitus. Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of a full-scale RCT and explore whether a TCM formula (BHT) has an additional effect on improving tinnitus when compared to informative counseling alone. Design: An assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial is used. Participants: Twenty-four patients with chronic subjective tinnitus will be enrolled. Interventions: The patients will be allocated randomly to receive a TCM formula (BHT, Bushen Huoxue Tongluo) and informative counseling or informative counseling alone. The oral BHT herbal granules will be taken twice per day continuously for 8 weeks. Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes include recruitment rate, intervention completion rate, and data completion rate to evaluate the feasibility. The secondary outcomes include Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, tinnitus functional index, tinnitus sensation level, self-rated visual analogue scale on tinnitus loudness and annoyance, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and adverse event. The outcome measures will be collected at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-week follow-up. Discussion: This trial is currently ongoing and is recruiting patients. The expected study results will find some preliminary evidence about the clinical effectiveness of BHT on chronic tinnitus and will also determine if it is feasible to conduct a full-scale RCT of BHT and identify the necessary changes to the protocol if possible.

Chinese medicine for residual symptoms of COVID-19 recovered patients (long COVID)-A double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled clinical trial protocol.

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the current global pandemic of which residual symptoms exhibited by post-acute, rehabilitating patients include fatigue, dyspnoea, and insomnia. Chinese medicine (CM) has been widely used in China to treat different stages of COVID-19. While there are a significant number of clinical studies suggesting its efficacy and safety in its use during acute stage, there are very few randomized controlled trials focusing on the rehabilitation stage. Liujunzhi Decoction and Shashen Maidong Decoction are frequently recommended by official clinical guidelines in China to treat COVID-19 patients in rehabilitation stage. This double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of the two formulae [named "COVID-19 Rehab Formula (CRF)"] in treating COVID-19 residual symptoms (long COVID). Methods: Eligible subjects will be randomly divided into treatment group and control group in 1:1 ratio. Treatment group will receive CRF along with certain pre-defined CM according to symptoms for 8 weeks, while control group will receive equivalent packs of placebo for 8 weeks. Data in terms of Fatigue Severity Score (FSS), self-reported COVID-19 long term symptom assessment, the modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnoea Scale, EuroQol Five-Dimension Five-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire, pulmonary function test and adverse events will be collected and analyzed by SPSS 24. Blood test on liver and renal functions will also be conducted as safety measures. Conclusion: This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of CRF in the treatment COVID-19 residual symptoms in a scientifically rigorous design. Clinical trial registration: [ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT04924881].

Noneffectiveness of electroacupuncture for comorbid generalized anxiety disorder and irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Comorbid generalized anxiety disorder and irritable bowel syndrome are common and therapeutically challenging. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of electroacupuncture in relieving anxiety and bowel symptoms in Chinese adults with this form of comorbidity. METHODS: In a single-blind randomized sham-controlled trial, subjects with comorbid generalized anxiety disorder and irritable bowel syndrome were randomly assigned to receive 10 weekly sessions of electroacupuncture or sham electroacupuncture. Patients were assessed at baseline, immediately after intervention and at 6-week follow-up. Primary outcome was anxiety (7-item Patient Health Questionnaire section for anxiety). Secondary outcomes included bowel symptoms (bowel symptoms questionnaire), depressive symptoms (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire), somatic symptoms (15-item Patient Health Questionnaire), and health-related quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimensions). RESULTS: Eighty subjects, 40 in each arm, were randomized. All but two in the sham group completed 10 weekly sessions. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients experiencing significant (≥ 50%) reduction of anxiety symptoms between the two groups immediately after intervention (32.4% vs 21.6%, P = 0.06) and at 6-week follow-up (25.7% in electroacupuncture vs 27% in sham, P = 0.65). Anxiety, depressive symptom, and bowel symptom severity did not differ significantly between electroacupuncture and sham groups. CONCLUSIONS: Findings failed to support the effectiveness of electroacupuncture for comorbid generalized anxiety disorder and irritable bowel syndrome. Further studies are needed to identify effective acupuncture treatment protocols for such comorbidity.

Electroacupuncture plus standard of care for managing refractory functional dyspepsia: protocol of a pragmatic trial with economic evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: This trial proposes to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of electroacupuncture (EA) plus on-demand gastrocaine with waiting list for EA plus on-demand gastrocaine in providing symptom relief and quality-of-life improvement among patients with functional dyspepsia (FD). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-centre, pragmatic, randomised parallel-group, superiority trial comparing the outcomes of (1) EA plus on-demand gastrocaine group and (2) waiting list to EA plus on-demand gastrocaine group. 132 (66/arm) endoscopically confirmed, Helicobacter pylori-negative patients with FD will be recruited. Enrolled patients will respectively be receiving (1) 20 sessions of EA over 10 weeks plus on-demand gastrocaine; or (2) on-demand gastrocaine and being nominated on to a waiting list for EA, which entitles them 20 sessions of EA over 10 weeks after 12 weeks of waiting. The primary outcome will be the between-group difference in proportion of patients achieving adequate relief of symptoms over 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes will include patient-reported change in global symptoms and individual symptoms, Nepean Dyspepsia Index, Nutrient Drink Test, 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9), and 7-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD7). Adverse events will be assessed formally. Results on direct medical costs and on the EuroQol (EQ-5D) questionnaire will also be used to assess cost-effectiveness. Analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle using appropriate univariate and multivariate methods. A mixed model analysis taking into account missing data of these outcomes will be performed. Cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed using established approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is supported by the Health and Medical Research Fund, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China. It has been approved by the Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong - New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and be disseminated in international conference. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-IPC-15007109; Pre-result.

Arabidopsis ACBP3 is an extracellularly targeted acyl-CoA-binding protein.

Cytosolic 10-kDa acyl-CoA-binding proteins (ACBPs) function in the storage and intracellular transport of acyl-CoA esters in eukaryotes. Fatty acids synthesized de novo in plant chloroplasts are exported as oleoyl-CoA and palmitoyl-CoA esters. In Arabidopsis, other than the 10-kDa ACBP, there exists five larger ACBPs (ACBP1 to ACBP5) of which homologues have not been characterized in other organisms. To investigate the significance of this gene family, we have attempted to subcellularly localize them and compare their acyl-CoA-binding affinities. We have previously shown that Arabidopsis ACBP1 and ACBP2 are membrane-associated proteins while ACBP4 and ACBP5 contain kelch motifs. Here, to localize ACBP3, we have expressed ACBP3-red fluorescent protein (DsRed2) from the CaMV 35S promoter. ACBP3-DsRed was localized extracellularly in transiently expressed tobacco BY-2 cells and onion epidermal cells. The function of the acyl-CoA-binding domain in ACBP3 was investigated by in vitro binding assays using (His)(6)-ACBP3, which was observed to bind [(14)C]arachidonyl-CoA with high affinity in comparison to [(14)C]palmitoyl-CoA and [(14)C]oleoyl-CoA. To identify the residues functional in binding, five mutants with single amino acid substitutions in the acyl-CoA-binding domain of (His)(6)-ACBP3 and (His)(6)-ACBP1 (which also binds [(14)C]arachidonyl-CoA) were generated by site-directed mutagenesis. Binding assays with arachidonyl-CoA revealed that replacement of a conserved R residue (R150A in ACBP1 and R284A in ACBP3), disrupted binding. In contrast, other substitutions in ACBP1 (Y126A, K130A, K152A and Y171A) and in ACBP3 (F260A, K264A, K286A and Y305A) did not affect arachidonyl-CoA binding, unlike their equivalents in (His)(6)-ACBP2, (His)(6)-ACBP4 and (His)(6)-ACBP5, which had altered binding to palmitoyl-CoA or oleoyl-CoA.