ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this overview is to assess systematic reviews (SRs)/ meta-analyses (MAs) of Huachansu (HCS) combination chemotherapy for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and provide summarized evidence for clinical decision making. METHODS: From the creation of the database to JUNE 2023, 8 databases in English and Chinese were searched. SRs/MAs that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. Two reviewers independently screened research, extracted data and assessed methodological quality, risk of bias, report quality and evidence quality by using relevant criteria from AMSTAR-2, ROBIS scale, PRISMA, and GRADE system. RESULTS: The short-term effect, long-term effect, quality of life improvement, safety and pain relief effect in 8 included SRs/MAs were assessed in this overview according to quantitative synthesis. Results assessed by AMSTAR-2, PRISMA, and ROBIS were generally unsatisfactory, with the results of the AMSTAR-2 assessment showing that all of them were of low or critically low quality; the number of items in the included research that were fully reported (compliance was 100%) by the PRISMA checklist was only 50%, while there were 38.10% of the research reporting less than 60% completeness; the ROBIS assessment showed a small number of systems to be low risk of bias. In addition, 26 items were rated as moderate quality, while 50.94% of items were rated as low or critically low quality by GRADE. CONCLUSION: HCS may be a promising adjuvant therapy for NSCLC. However, high-quality SRs/MAs and randomized control trials (RCTs) should be conducted to provide sufficient evidence so as to draw a definitive conclusion.