Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 131(4): 365-372, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34096343

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Facial paralysis is a debilitating condition with substantial functional and psychological consequences. This feline-model study evaluates whether facial muscles can be selectively activated in acute and chronic implantation of 16-channel multichannel cuff electrodes (MCE). METHODS: Two cats underwent acute terminal MCE implantation experiments, 2 underwent chronic MCE implantation in uninjured facial nerves (FN) and tested for 6 months, and 2 underwent chronic MCE implantation experiments after FN transection injury and tested for 3 months. The MCE were wrapped around the main trunk of the skeletonized FN, and data collection consisted of EMG thresholds, amplitudes, and selectivity of muscle activation. RESULTS: In acute experimentation, activation of specific channels (ie, channels 1-3 and 6-8) resulted in selective activation of orbicularis oculi, whereas activation of other channels (ie, channels 4, 5, or 8) led to selective activation of levator auris longus with higher EMG amplitudes. MCE implantation yielded stable and selective facial muscle activation EMG thresholds and amplitudes up to a 5-month period. Modest selective muscle activation was furthermore obtained after a complete transection-reapproximating nerve injury after a 3-month recovery period and implantation reoperation. Chronic implantation of MCE did not lead to fibrosis on histology. Field steering was achieved to activate distinct facial muscles by sending simultaneous subthreshold currents to multiple channels, thus theoretically protecting against nerve damage from chronic electrical stimulation. CONCLUSION: Our proof-of-concept results show the ability of an MCE, supplemented with field steering, to provide a degree of selective facial muscle stimulation in a feline model, even following nerve regeneration after FN injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy/instrumentation , Electrodes, Implanted , Facial Muscles/innervation , Facial Muscles/physiopathology , Facial Nerve Injuries/complications , Facial Paralysis/therapy , Muscle Contraction/physiology , Animals , Cats , Disease Models, Animal , Electromyography , Facial Nerve Injuries/physiopathology , Facial Paralysis/etiology , Facial Paralysis/physiopathology , Female
2.
Trends Hear ; 23: 2331216518821449, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30803416

ABSTRACT

Noninvasive transcranial or minimally invasive transtympanic electric stimulation may offer a desirable treatment option for tinnitus because it can activate the deafferented auditory nerve fibers while posing little to no risk to hearing. Here, we built a flexible research interface to generate and control accurately charge-balanced current stimulation as well as a head-mounted instrument capable of holding a transtympanic electrode steady for hours. We then investigated the short-term effect of a limited set of electric stimulation parameters on tinnitus in 10 adults with chronic tinnitus. The preliminary results showed that 63% of conditions of electric stimulation produced some degree of tinnitus reduction, with total disappearance of tinnitus in six subjects in response to at least one condition. The present study also found significant side effects such as visual, tactile, and even pain sensations during electric stimulation. In addition to masking and residual inhibition, neuroplasticity is likely involved in the observed tinnitus reduction. To translate the present electric stimulation into a safe and effective tinnitus treatment option, we need to optimize stimulation parameters that activate the deafferented auditory nerve fibers and reliably suppress tinnitus, with minimal side effects and tolerable sensations. Noninvasive or minimally invasive electric stimulation can be integrated with sound therapy, invasive cochlear implants, or other forms of coordinated stimulation to provide a systematic strategy for tinnitus treatment or even a cure.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Tinnitus/therapy , Aged , Feasibility Studies , Female , Hearing/physiology , Hearing Tests , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Research Design , Treatment Outcome
3.
Neurosurg Rev ; 42(2): 227-241, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29063229

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to discuss the state of the art with regard to established or promising bioelectric therapies meant to alter or control neurologic function. We present recent reports on bioelectric technologies that interface with the nervous system at three potential sites-(1) the end organ, (2) the peripheral nervous system, and (3) the central nervous system-while exploring practical and clinical considerations. A literature search was executed on PubMed, IEEE, and Web of Science databases. A review of the current literature was conducted to examine functional and histomorphological effects of neuroprosthetic interfaces with a focus on end-organ, peripheral, and central nervous system interfaces. Innovations in bioelectric technologies are providing increasing selectivity in stimulating distinct nerve fiber populations in order to activate discrete muscles. Significant advances in electrode array design focus on increasing selectivity, stability, and functionality of implantable neuroprosthetics. The application of neuroprosthetics to paretic nerves or even directly stimulating or recording from the central nervous system holds great potential in advancing the field of nerve and tissue bioelectric engineering and contributing to clinical care. Although current physiotherapeutic and surgical treatments seek to restore function, structure, or comfort, they bear significant limitations in enabling cosmetic or functional recovery. Instead, the introduction of bioelectric technology may play a role in the restoration of function in patients with neurologic deficits.


Subject(s)
Bioelectric Energy Sources , Electric Stimulation Therapy/instrumentation , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Electrodes , Humans , Prostheses and Implants
4.
Laryngoscope ; 128(7): 1606-1614, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29086427

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Laryngeal muscles (LMs) are controlled by the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN), injury of which can result in vocal fold (VF) paralysis (VFP). We aimed to introduce a bioelectric approach to selective stimulation of LMs and graded muscle contraction responses. STUDY DESIGN: Acute experiments in cats. METHODS: The study included six anesthetized cats. In four cats, a multichannel penetrating microelectrode array (MEA) was placed into an uninjured RLN. For RLN injury experiments, one cat received a standardized hemostat-crush injury, and one cat received a transection-reapproximation injury 4 months prior to testing. In each experiment, three LMs (thyroarytenoid, posterior cricoarytenoid, and cricothyroid muscles) were monitored with an electromyographic (EMG) nerve integrity monitoring system. Electrical current pulses were delivered to each stimulating channel individually. Elicited EMG voltage outputs were recorded for each muscle. Direct videolaryngoscopy was performed for visualization of VF movement. RESULTS: Stimulation through individual channels led to selective activation of restricted nerve populations, resulting in selective contraction of individual LMs. Increasing current levels resulted in rising EMG voltage responses. Typically, activation of individual muscles was successfully achieved via single placement of the MEA by selection of appropriate stimulation channels. VF abduction was predominantly observed on videolaryngoscopy. Nerve histology confirmed injury in cases of RLN crush and transection experiments. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the ability of a penetrating MEA to selectively stimulate restricted fiber populations within the feline RLN and selectively elicit contractions of discrete LMs in both acute and injury-model experiments, suggesting a potential role for intraneural MEA implantation in VFP management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA. Laryngoscope, 128:1606-1614, 2018.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy , Electric Stimulation/instrumentation , Laryngeal Muscles/physiology , Muscle Contraction/physiology , Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve/physiology , Vocal Cord Paralysis/therapy , Animals , Cats , Disease Models, Animal , Electrodes, Implanted , Electromyography , Nerve Fibers/physiology , Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve/anatomy & histology , Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve/pathology , Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries/complications , Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries/pathology , Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries/physiopathology , Vocal Cord Paralysis/etiology
5.
Otol Neurotol ; 38(9): e369-e377, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28834941

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Our group has previously shown that activation of specific facial nerve (FN) fiber populations and selective activation of facial musculature can be achieved through acute intraneural multichannel microelectrode array (MEA) implantation in the feline model. HYPOTHESIS: Selective stimulation of facial muscles will be maintained in the setting of 1) chronic and 2) acute MEA implantation after FN injury and subsequent recovery. METHODS: This study included seven cats. In three cats with normal facial function, 4-channel penetrating MEAs were implanted chronically in the FN and tested biweekly for 6 months. Electrical current pulses were delivered to each channel individually, and elicited electromyographic (EMG) voltage outputs were recorded for each of several facial muscles. For FN injury experiments, two cats received a standardized hemostat-crush injury, and two cats received a transection-reapproximation injury to the FN main trunk. These four underwent acute implantation of MEA and EMG recording in terminal experiments 4 months postinjury. RESULTS: Stimulation through individual channels selectively activated restricted nerve populations, resulting in activation of individual muscles in cats with chronic MEA implantation and after nerve injury. Increasing stimulation current levels resulted in increasing EMG voltage responses in all patients. Nerve histology showed only minor neural tissue reaction to the implant. CONCLUSION: We have established in the animal model the ability of a chronically implanted MEA to selectively stimulate restricted FN fiber populations and elicit activations in specific facial muscles. Likewise, after FN injury, selective stimulation of restricted FN fiber populations and subsequent activation of discrete facial muscles can be achieved after acute MEA implantation.


Subject(s)
Electrodes, Implanted , Electromyography/instrumentation , Facial Muscles/physiopathology , Facial Nerve Injuries/surgery , Facial Nerve/physiopathology , Facial Paralysis/therapy , Animals , Cats , Disease Models, Animal , Electric Stimulation/methods , Electric Stimulation Therapy , Facial Nerve Injuries/physiopathology , Facial Paralysis/physiopathology , Female
6.
Laryngoscope ; 127(2): 466-469, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27301552

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Quantify the relationships between tinnitus, and anxiety and depression among adults. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of a national health survey. METHODS: Adult respondents in the 2007 Integrated Health Interview Series tinnitus module were analyzed. Data for tinnitus symptoms and severity and reported anxiety and depression symptoms were extracted. Associations between tinnitus problems and anxiety, depression, lost workdays, days of alcohol consumption, and mean hours of sleep were assessed. RESULTS: Among 21.4 ± 0.69 million adult tinnitus sufferers, 26.1% reported problems with anxiety in the preceding 12 months, whereas only 9.2% of those without tinnitus reported an anxiety problem (P < .001). Similarly, 25.6% of respondents with tinnitus reported problems with depression, whereas only 9.1% of those without tinnitus reported depression symptoms (P < .001). Those reporting tinnitus symptoms as a "big" or "very big" problem were more likely to concurrently report anxiety (odds ratio [OR]: 5.7; 95% CI: 4.0-8.1; P < .001) and depression (OR: 4.8; 95% CI: 3.5-6.7; P < .001) symptoms. Tinnitus sufferers reported significantly fewer mean hours of sleep per night (7.00 vs. 7.21; P < .001) and greater mean days of work missed (6.94 vs. 3.79, P < .001) compared to those who did not report tinnitus. Mean days of alcohol consumption between the two groups were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Tinnitus symptoms are closely associated with anxiety, depression, shorter sleep duration, and greater workdays missed. These comorbidities and sequelae should be recognized and addressed to optimally manage patients with chronic and bothersome tinnitus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 2016 127:466-469, 2017.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Tinnitus/epidemiology , Tinnitus/psychology , Absenteeism , Adult , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Sleep Deprivation/epidemiology , Sleep Deprivation/psychology , Statistics as Topic , United States
7.
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 23(5): 382-7, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26208122

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Electric stimulation is a potent means of neuromodulation that has been used to restore hearing and minimize tremor, but its application on tinnitus symptoms has been limited. We examine recent evidence to identify the knowledge gaps in the use of electric stimulation for tinnitus treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies using electric stimulation to suppress tinnitus in humans are categorized according to their points of attacks. First, noninvasive, direct current stimulation uses an active electrode in the ear canal, tympanic membrane, or temporal scalp. Second, inner ear stimulation uses charge-balanced biphasic stimulation by placing an active electrode on the promontory or round window, or a cochlear implant array in the cochlea. Third, intraneural implants can provide targeted stimulation of specific sites along the auditory pathway. Although these studies demonstrated some success in tinnitus suppression, none established a link between tinnitus suppression efficacy and tinnitus-generating mechanisms. SUMMARY: Electric stimulation provides a unique opportunity to suppress tinnitus. Challenges include matching electric stimulation sites and patterns to tinnitus locus and type, meeting the oftentimes-contradictory demands between tinnitus suppression and other indications, such as speech understanding, and justifying the costs and risks of electric stimulation for tinnitus symptoms.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy , Tinnitus/therapy , Auditory Pathways , Cochlear Nerve , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL