Effect of a Novel Macrophage-Regulating Drug on Wound Healing in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Delayed healing of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is known to be caused by dysregulated M1/M2-type macrophages, and restoring the balance between these macrophage types plays a critical role in healing. However, drugs used to regulate M1/M2 macrophages have not yet been studied in large randomized clinical trials. Objective: To compare the topical application of ON101 cream with use of an absorbent dressing (Hydrofiber; ConvaTec Ltd) when treating DFUs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, evaluator-blinded, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was performed in 21 clinical and medical centers across the US, China, and Taiwan from November 23, 2012, to May 11, 2020. Eligible patients with debrided DFUs of 1 to 25 cm2 present for at least 4 weeks and with Wagner grade 1 or 2 were randomized 1:1 to receive ON101 or control absorbent dressings. Interventions: Twice-daily applications of ON101 or a absorbent dressing changed once daily or 2 to 3 times a week for 16 weeks, with a 12-week follow-up. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the incidence of complete healing, defined as complete re-epithelialization at 2 consecutive visits during the treatment period assessed on the full-analysis set (FAS) of all participants with postrandomization data collected. Safety outcomes included assessment of the incidences of adverse events, clinical laboratory values, and vital signs. Results: In the FAS, 236 eligible patients (175 men [74.2%]; mean [SD] age, 57.0 [10.9] years; mean [SD] glycated hemoglobin level, 8.1% [1.6%]) with DFUs classified as Wagner grade 1 or 2 (mean [SD] ulcer area, 4.8 [4.4] cm2) were randomized to receive either the ON101 cream (n = 122) or the absorbent dressing (n = 114) for as long as 16 weeks. The incidence of complete healing in the FAS included 74 patients (60.7%) in the ON101 group and 40 (35.1%) in the comparator group during the 16-week treatment period (difference, 25.6 percentage points; odds ratio, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.66-4.84; P < .001). A total of 7 (5.7%) treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in the ON101 group vs 5 (4.4%) in the comparator group. No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in the ON101 group vs 1 (0.9%) in the comparator group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this multicenter randomized clinical trial, ON101 exhibited better healing efficacy than absorbent dressing alone in the treatment of DFUs and showed consistent efficacy among all patients, including those with DFU-related risk factors (glycated hemoglobin level, ≥9%; ulcer area, >5 cm2; and DFU duration, ≥6 months). Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01898923.

Hyperbaric oxygen facilitates the effect of endothelial progenitor cell therapy on improving outcome of rat critical limb ischemia.

We tested the hypothesis that hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) (100% oxygen/2.4 atmospheres) facilitated the effect of autologous endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) therapy on restoring the blood flow in rat critical-limb ischemia (CLI). Adult-male-SD rats (n = 8/each group) were categorized into group 1 [sham control (SC)], group 2 (CLI-treated with culture medium), group 3 [CLI-intermittent HBO (3 h/day for 5 consecutive days after CLI), group 4 (CLI-EPC/2.0 × 106 cells), and group 5 (CLI-HBO-EPC). By day 5 after CLI, flow cytometry showed that the circulating EPC (Sca-1/CD31+/C-kit/CD31+/CD34+) levels were highest in group 5 and lowest in group 2 (all P < 0.001). By day 14, laser Doppler demonstrated that the ratio of blood flow (i.e., CLI to normal hind-limb) was highest in group 1, lowest in group 2 and significantly higher in group 5 than in groups 3 and 4 (all P < 0.0001). The protein expressions of endothelial-cell biomarkers (CD31/vWF/eNOS), and numbers of endothelial-cell markers (CD31+/vWF+) and small vessels exhibited a similar pattern to blood-flow ratio among five groups, whereas the angiogenesis parameters in protein (CXCR4/SDF-1α/HIF-1α/VEGF) and cellular (HIF-1α/SDF-1α/CXCR4+) levels were progressively increased from groups 1 to 5 (all P < 0.0001). The protein expression of apoptotic (mitochondrial-Bax/cleaved-capspase-3/PARP), fibrotic (p-Smad3/TGF-ß) and mitochondrial-damaged (cytosolic-cytochrome C) exhibited an opposite pattern, whereas the protein expressions of anti-fibrotic (BMP-2/p-Smad1/5) and mitochondrial integrity (mitochondrial-cytochrome C) exhibited an identical pattern of ratio of blood flow among the five groups (all P < 0.0001). Combined HBO-EPC therapy is superior to either one alone in improving ischemia in rodent CLI.

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Enhanced Circulating Levels of Endothelial Progenitor Cells and Angiogenesis Biomarkers, Blood Flow, in Ischemic Areas in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease.

BACKGROUND: This study tested the hypothesis that hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy enhanced the circulating levels of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), soluble angiogenesis factors, and blood flow in ischemic areas in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). METHODS: In total, 57 consecutive patients with PAOD undergoing the HBO therapy (3 atmospheres (atm) for 2 h each time) were prospectively enrolled into the present study. Venous blood sampling was performed to assess the circulating levels of EPCs and soluble angiogenesis factors prior to and during five sessions of HBO therapy. Additionally, skin perfusion pressure (SPP), an indicator of blood flow in ischemic areas, was measured by moorVMS-PRES. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that the circulating levels of EPCs (cluster of differentiation (CD)34⁺/CD133⁺/CD45dim, CD31⁺/CD133⁺/CD45dim, CD34⁺) and soluble angiogenesis factors-vascular endothelial growth factor/stromal cell-derived factor 1/hepatocyte growth factor/fibroblast growth factor (VEGF/SDF-1α/HGF/FGF) were significantly increased post-HBO therapy as compared to pre-HBO therapy (all p < 0.01). Additionally, Matrigel assay showed that the angiogenesis was significantly increased in post-HBO therapy as compared to prior to therapy (p < 0.001). Furthermore, SPP was significantly increased in the ischemic area (i.e., plantar foot and mean SPP of the ischemic foot) in post-HBO therapy as compared to pre-HBO therapy (all p < 0.01). Importantly, the HBO therapy did appear to result in complications, and all the patients were uneventfully discharged without amputation. CONCLUSIONS: HBO therapy augmented circulating levels of EPCs and angiogenesis factors, and improved the blood flow in the ischemic area.