Weighing the prognostic role of hyponatremia in hospitalized patients with metastatic solid tumors: the HYPNOSIS study.

Previous works linked low sodium concentration with mortality risk in cancer. We aimed at weighing the prognostic impact of hyponatremia in all consecutive patients with metastatic solid tumors admitted in a two-years period at our medical oncology department. Patients were included in two cohorts based on serum sodium concentration on admission. A total of 1025 patients were included, of whom 279 (27.2%) were found to be hyponatremic. The highest prevalence of hyponatremia was observed in biliary tract (51%), prostate (45%) and small-cell lung cancer (38.9%). With a median follow-up of 26.9 months, median OS was 2 months and 13.2 months for the hyponatremia versus control cohort, respectively (HR, 2.65; P < 0.001). In the multivariable model, hyponatremia was independently associated with poorer OS (HR, 1.66; P < 0.001). According to the multivariable model, a nomogram system was developed and validated in an external set of patients. We weighed over time the influence of hyponatremia on survival of patients with metastatic solid tumors and pointed out the possibility to exploit serum sodium assessment to design integrated prognostic tools. Our study also highlights the need for a deeper characterization of the biological role of extracellular sodium levels in tumor development and progression.

Neoadjuvant sorafenib, gemcitabine, and cisplatin administration preceding cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma: An open-label, single-arm, single-center, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIUBC) should be improved. Sorafenib was combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy (SGC) in an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial (NCT01222676). PATIENTS AND METHODS: After transurethral resection of the bladder, T2-T4a N0 patients received four cycles of SGC followed by cystectomy. Sorafenib 400mg q12h daily, continuously, was added to standard GC chemotherapy. In a Simon's 2-stage design, the primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pT0), assuming H0: ≤0.20 and H1: ≥0.40, with a type I and type II error of 5% and 10%, respectively. RESULTS: From April 2011 to June 2016, 46 patients were enrolled. Pathologic T0 response was obtained in 20 patients (43.5%, 95% CI: 28.9-58.9); pT ≤ 1 in 25 (54.3%, 95% CI: 39.0-69.1). After a median follow-up of 35 months, the median progression-free survival was not reached (NR, interquartile range: 23.6-NR), nor was median overall survival (interquartile range: 30.3-NR). Hematologic and extrahematologic grade 3 to 4 adverse events occurred in 45.6% and 26.1% of patients, respectively. In 29 samples from responders (pT ≤ 1) and nonresponders, different distribution of missense mutations involved DNA-repair genes, RAS-RAF pathway genes, chromatin-remodeling genes, and HER-family genes. ERCC1 immunohistochemical expression was associated with pT ≤ 1 response (P = 0.047). The absence of a comparator arm prevented us to quantify sorafenib contribution. CONCLUSIONS: SGC combination was active in MIUBC, and the identified molecular features included alterations that may help personalize treatment in MIUBC with new more potent targeted agents, combined with chemotherapy.

Prognostic Factors of Adjuvant Taxane, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil Chemotherapy for Patients With Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Regional Lymphadenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the outcomes and prognostic factors of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma after regional lymphadenectomy (LAD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data from 21 patients who had received taxane, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF, every 3 weeks) in the adjuvant setting at our center. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were undertaken for disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of TPF. RESULTS: The patients had received TPF from July 2004 to July 2012 after inguinal (n = 6) or inguinal plus pelvic LAD (n = 15), and the median follow-up was 52 months. Thirteen (61.9%) had pelvic and 5 (23.8%) bilateral inguinal nodal metastases. The median time from LAD to the start of TPF was 5.4 weeks (interquartile range [IQR], 4.1-7.3 weeks). Metastatic tumor tissue from 11 of 19 evaluable patients (57.9%) showed positive immunohistochemistry staining for p53. Univariably, only the expression of p53 showed a trend toward poorer DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 4.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-19.68; P = .074) and OS (HR, 4.54; 95% CI, 0.95-21.56; P = .056). The same results were obtained multivariably for DFS (HR, 3.76; 95% CI, 0.78-17.96; P = .096) and OS (HR, 4.29; 95% CI, 0.89-20.57; P = .067). The median DFS was 8.9 months (IQR, 5.9-22.7 months) for p53-expressing patients versus not estimable for non-p53-expressing patients (P = .051) and the median OS was 17.2 months (IQR, 12.8-22.7 months) and not estimable, respectively (P = .037). CONCLUSION: In patients who had received adjuvant TPF for node-positive penile squamous cell carcinoma, p53 IHC expression seemed to be associated with a poorer outcome, and further study is warranted in larger data sets to confirm these findings. This information might be useful to improve the prognostic allocation.

Primary chemotherapy in resectable oral cavity squamous cell cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Prognosis of patients with advanced oral cavity cancer is worth improving. Chemotherapy has been reported to be especially active in oral cavity tumors. Here we repeat the results of a randomized, multicenter trial enrolling patients with a resectable, stage T2-T4 (> 3 cm), N0-N2, M0 untreated, squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to three cycles of cisplatin and fluorouracil followed by surgery (chemotherapy arm) or surgery alone (control arm). In both arms, postoperative radiotherapy was reserved to high-risk patients, and surgery was modulated depending on the tumor's closeness to the mandible. Patients' accrual was opened in 1989 and closed in 1999. It included 195 patients. RESULTS: In the chemotherapy arm, three toxic deaths were recorded. No significant difference in overall survival was found. Five-year overall survival was, for both arms, 55%. Postoperative radiotherapy was administered in 33% of patients in the chemotherapy arm, versus 46% in the control arm. A mandible resection was performed in 52% of patients in the control arm, versus 31% in the chemotherapy arm. CONCLUSION: The addition of primary chemotherapy to standard surgery was unable to improve survival. However, in this study, primary chemotherapy seemed to play a role in reducing the number of patients who needed to undergo mandibulectomy and/or radiation therapy. Variations in the criteria used to select patients for these treatment options may make it difficult to generalize these results, but there appears to be room for using preoperative chemotherapy to spare destructive surgery or radiation therapy in patients with advanced, resectable oral cavity cancer.