Comparable outcomes among unmanipulated haploidentical, matched unrelated, and matched sibling donors in BU-based myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for intermediate and adverse risk acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission: a single-center study.

There are a limited number of studies comparing outcomes of busulfan (BU)-based myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using unmanipulated haploidentical donors (HIDs), HLA-matched unrelated donors (MUDs), and HLA-matched sibling related donors (MSDs) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with complete remission (CR) status. With this background, we compared outcomes among 377 cases of CR following consecutive HID-HSCT for AML (CR) to 86 MUD and 92 MSD-HSCT cases. All patients received BU-based myeloablative conditioning and an unmanipulated graft within the same period. The median patient age was 23 years (range 1.1 to 65 years), and 230 patients (41.4%) were under age18. Among the 555 patients, 432 (77.8%) were of intermediate cytogenetic risk and 123 (22.2%) were of adverse risk. A total of 113 patients (20.5%) had FLT3-ITD+ AML, 425 patients (76.6%) were in first complete remission (CR1) post-transplant, and 130 (23.4%) patients were in second CR (CR2). GVHD prophylaxis included mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine-A (CSA) with short-term methotrexate (MTX) for HID, and MUD-HSCT. MMF is not used for MSD-HSCT. The median survival follow-up time was 42 months (range 18-91 months). The 3-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) among the HID, MUD, and MSD cohorts was 73.8% ± 4.8%, 66.4% ± 8.5%, 74.5% ± 2.4%, respectively (P = 0.637). Three-year overall survival (OS) was 74.9% ± 2.4%, 81.8% ± 4.3%, and 77.5% ± 4.5% among the HID, MUD, and MSD cohorts, respectively (P = 0.322). There were no difference among the relapse rate among the HID, MUD, and MSD donor cohorts (14.3% ± 4.0% vs 20.3% ± 6.4% vs 14.5% ± 2.2, respectively; P = 0.851) or the non-relapse mortality (NRM) (12.3% ± 3.5% vs 9.5% ± 3.2% vs 14.0% ± 1.8%, respectively; P = 0.441). Multivariate analyses showed that MRD-positive pre-HSCT was the only risk factor associated with a lower OS and LFS and higher risk of relapse among all 555 patients. Compared with the use of a MUD or MSD, an HID for HSCT had similar outcomes among AML patients with CR states who underwent an allo-HSCT with BU-based myeloablative conditioning. MFC-MRD-positive pre-HSCT was an independent negative factor impact on outcomes for AML patients in CR. We conclude that for AML patients who do not have a MSD or if an urgent transplant is required, HSCT from an HID is a valid option.

[An analysis of etiological and genetic factors of a patient with familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the etiological factor and genetic feature of a familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis patient with PRF1 mutation (FHL2) with human herpesvirus 7 (HHV7) infection and its family constellation. METHODS: Clinical characteristics, laboratory examinations of a FHL2 case with HHV7 infection were reported. HHV1-HHV8 virus DNA was screened by PCR; NK cell function was analyzed by flow cytometry; PRF1 gene mutations were analyzed by PCR and direct sequencing, structure of mutant PRF1 proteins were analyzed using ExPasy and I-TASSER server and genetics pedigree were analyzed. RESULTS: The patient's HHV7 viral was detected positive with DNA copy number of 350/10(6) peripheral nucleated cells. Flow cytometry analysis showed decrease both in proportion of perforin positive NK cells and perforin protein expression. Genetic testing showed PRF1 biallelic heterozygote mutations (c.503G > A/p.S168N and c.1177T > C/p.C393R) and pedigree analysis showed they were inherited. The patient was then treated with antivirus therapy, dexamethasone and VP16 therapy, but only achieved partial response. The patient was then followed by human leukocyte antigen 10/10 allele identical non-consanguinity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (allo-HSCT) and soon the successful implantation of donor hematopoietic cells and persistent recovery was achieved. The patient was now surviving without recurrence for 9 months after allo-HSCT. CONCLUSIONS: FHL is prone to be misdiagnosed as lymphoma. Genetic analysis of related gene mutation and herpes simplex virus detection will help in early and accurate diagnosis. Allo-HSCT is a fundamental treatment of FHL.

[Effects of plumbagin on the human acute promyelocytic leukemia cells in vitro].

According to previous clinical experiences of the authors, plumbago zeylanica was effective against acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). However, its effectiveness has never been proven experimentally or unequivocally clinically. This study was aimed to investigate the effects of plumbagin on the proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis of APL cell line NB4 Cells. Cell inhibitory rates were detected by MTT colorimetric assay; morphologic changes were observed under light microscope and transmission electron microscope; apoptosis-inducing effects were determined by DNA gel electrophoresis, annexin V/PI double-stained and PI single-stained flow cytometry. The results demonstrated that 2-15 micromol/L plumbagin inhibited the proliferation of NB4 cells in a dose-dependent manner. The morphologic changes of cell apoptosis, such as chromsome condensation and apoptotic body formation, were observed by light microscope and transmission electron microscope. Cell cycle analysis showed that NB4 cells were blocked in G2/M phase of cell cycle. And plumbagin induced annexin V+/PI- cell increase and DNA fragmentation. There was a correlation between cell apoptosis rates and the concentrations of plumbagin in dose-dependent manner (P < 0.05). It is concluded that for the first time the present study shows that plumbagin can inhibit cell proliferation, block cell cycle and induce apoptosis of APL cell line NB4 cells.

[Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for treatment of Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the optimal time of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) applied in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL), and the optimum order of donor selection. METHODS: From Mar 2000 to Jul 2004, 32 patients with Ph+ ALL were treated by Allo-HSCT, and the follow up ended at Dec 30.2004 with medium of 13 months. Of whom, 24 were male, and 8 were female. Twenty-three patients have been transplanted in CR1, 9 patients beyond CR1 (1 in CR2, 8 in refractory or relapse status). Twelve cases received HSCT from identical sibling donor, 4 unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation (CBT), 3 HSCT from matched unrelated donor (MUD), and 13 HSCT from mismatched related donor (MMRD), of which, 6 cases were M(BCR/ABL) subtype, and 20 m(BCR/ABL) subtype. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the probabilities of leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS) and relapse incidence (RI), and the factors were compared by means of the Log-rank test. Simultaneous effect of multiple covariates were estimated with Cox model. RESULTS: Of all the 32 cases engrafted, 4-year OS was 57.19%, LFS 37.09%, and RI 56.36%. In univariate prognostic analysis model, the OS was higher in CR1 group pre-HSCT than that in non-CR1 group (74.50% vs 22.22%, P=0.0046), LFS was higher (49.06% vs 11.11%, P=0.0057), RI was lower (44.80% vs 84.76%, P=0.0157); the OS was higher in M(BCR/ABL) group than that in m(BCR/ABL) group (100% vs 40.91%, P=0.0318), LFS was higher (75% vs 17.72%, P=0.0057), RI was lower (25% vs 77.88, P=0.0116); OS was similar in HLA MM RD group to that in HLA identical group (52.65% vs 55.56%, P=0.6247), LFS was similar (45.12% vs 30.00%, P=0.8315), and RI was also similar (50.77% vs 60.62%, P=0.8217). In multiple covariate analysis model, the BCR/ABL type was the risk factor of LFS [P=0.005, Exp(B)=9.971] and RI (P=0.006, Exp(B)=9.488), the status of disease pre-HSCT and BCR/ABL subtype was the risk factor of OS [P was 0.010 and 0.038, Exp(B) was 4.532 and 37.537 respectively]. CONCLUSION: We had better do HSCT in CR1 to treat Ph+ ALL, if patient is refractory to chemotherapy, we can try STI571, and HSCT should be done as soon as possible if the patients get CR. Mismatched related donor is considered as regular donor for Ph+ ALL patients without identical donors. We should pay more attention to monitoring and prophylaxis of relapse in m(BCR/ABL) patients after HSCT.

[An in vitro study of cytotoxic and antineoplastic effect of Solanum nigrum L extract on U266].

OBJECTIVE: To study cytotoxicity and antineoplastic effect in vitro Solanum nigrum L extract on U266. METHODS: U266 cells were cultured together with the extract of Solanum nigrum L. Cytotoxicity assay was tested by CCK-8. Cell cycle and apoptosis were determined using flow cytometry (FCM) analysis. RESULTS: Extract of Solanum nigrum L showed strong cytotoxicity against U266 cells. The IC50 was about 117 mg/L. After exposure of U266 cells to the drug for 48 hours, the cell cycle distribution was changed compared with the controls. There was decrease of cells in the G0/G1 phase with increase of cells in the S phase and G2/M phase. Apoptosis of U266 cells could be shown with staining of Annexin V FITC/PI or TFAR19 testing through FCM. The proportion of apoptotic cells increased in parallel with the increase of the drug dosage. CONCLUSION: Solanum nigrum L extract showed strong cytotoxicity effect on U266 cells. The antineoplastic effect of the drug can partly be ascribed to its apoptotic inducing effect.