Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM
Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Clin Cancer Res ; 23(16): 4633-4641, 2017 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28465443

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Endoglin (CD105) is an endothelial cell membrane receptor highly expressed on proliferating tumor vasculature, including that of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and is associated with poor prognosis. Endoglin is essential for angiogenesis, and its expression is induced by hypoxia and VEGF pathway inhibition. TRC105 is a chimeric IgG1 CD105 mAb that inhibits angiogenesis and causes antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and apoptosis of proliferating endothelium.Experimental Design: Patients with HCC (Child-Pugh A/B7), ECOG 0/1, were enrolled in a phase I study of TRC105 at 3, 6, 10, and 15 mg/kg every 2 weeks given with sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. Correlative biomarkers included DCE-MRI and plasma levels of angiogenic factors, including soluble endoglin. Pharmacokinetics were assessed in serum.Results: Twenty-six patients were enrolled, of whom 25 received treatment, 15 with cirrhosis. Hep B/C: 3/15; M:F 19:6; mean age of 60 (range, 18-76); 1 DLT (grade 3 AST) occurred at 10 mg/kg. The most frequent toxicity was low-grade epistaxis, a known toxicity of TRC105. One patient experienced an infusion reaction and was replaced. One patient with coronary stenosis developed a fatal myocardial infarction, and one patient developed G3 cerebral tumor hemorrhage. MTD was not established and DL4 (15 mg/kg) was expanded. The overall response rate in 24 evaluable patients at all 4 dose levels was 21% [95% confidence interval (CI), 7.1-42.2], and 25% (95% CI, 8.7-49.1) in patients with measureable disease. Four patients had confirmed stable disease, one of whom was treated for 22 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for 24 patients evaluable for PFS was 3.8 months (95% CI, 3.2-5.6 months); median overall survival was 15.5 months (95% CI, 8.5-26.3 months).Conclusions: TRC105 combined with sorafenib was well tolerated at the recommended single agent doses of both drugs. Encouraging evidence of activity to date (PR rate 25%) was observed, and the study is now continuing to recruit in the phase II stage as a multicenter study to confirm activity of the combination. Clin Cancer Res; 23(16); 4633-41. ©2017 AACR.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacokinetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Disease-Free Survival , Epistaxis/chemically induced , Female , Headache/chemically induced , Humans , Liver Neoplasms, Experimental/drug therapy , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Middle Aged , Niacinamide/administration & dosage , Niacinamide/adverse effects , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Niacinamide/pharmacokinetics , Phenylurea Compounds/administration & dosage , Phenylurea Compounds/adverse effects , Phenylurea Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Sorafenib , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
J Hepatol ; 62(6): 1420-9, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25733155

ABSTRACT

Current systemic treatment options for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are limited to sorafenib. With the recent FDA approval of the second PD1-PD-L1 pathway inhibitor, immunotherapy has gained even more interest as a potential novel treatment option for patients with HCC. This is due not only because of the failure of other treatment approaches in the past, but also because immunological mechanisms have been shown to play an important role during tumor development, growth, and treatment. Here we present a review of immunological mechanisms in the liver relevant for tumor progression and treatment. We summarize our current knowledge on immune activating and immune suppressing mechanisms during tumor initiation, development, and treatment. We try to explain the paradox of how inflammatory responses in a setting of chronic infection promote tumor development, while the primary aim of immunotherapy is to activate immunity. Finally we summarize recent advances in addition to providing an outlook for the immunotherapy of HCC.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/immunology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Immunotherapy/methods , Liver Neoplasms/immunology , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Adoptive Transfer , Cancer Vaccines/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials as Topic , Cytokines/therapeutic use , Humans , Immune Tolerance , Immunosuppression Therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL