Amygdalin Modulates Prostate Cancer Cell Adhesion and Migration In Vitro.

The natural compound, amygdalin, is notably popular with prostate cancer patients as an alternative or complementary treatment option. However, knowledge about its mode of action is sparse. We investigated amygdalin's impact on prostate cancer adhesion and motile behavior. DU-145 and PC3 cancer cells were exposed to amygdalin. Adhesion to human vascular endothelium or immobilized collagen was then explored. The influence of amygdalin on chemotaxis and migration was also investigated, as well as amygdalin induced alteration to surface and total cellular α and ß integrin expression. Integrin knockdown was performed to evaluate the integrin influence on chemotaxis and adhesion. Amygdalin significantly reduced chemotactic activity, migration, and adhesion of DU-145 but not of PC3 cells. Amygdalin elevated integrin α2 in both cell lines. Integrin α6 was reduced by amygdalin only in DU-145 cells, whereas ß1 increased only in PC3 cells. Functional blocking revealed a negative association of α2 with PC3 and DU-145 chemotaxis. The ß1 increase correlated with enhanced chemotaxis, the diminished α6 expression with reduced chemotaxis. Amygdalin acted on prostate cancer cells in vitro. It induced downregulation of α6 integrin in DU-145 but not in PC3 cells, suggesting that exposing certain prostate cancer cells to amygdalin might inhibit metastatic spread promoted by this particular integrin.

Cyanide and lactate levels in patients during chronic oral amygdalin intake followed by intravenous amygdalin administration.

The natural compound amygdalin has gained high popularity among tumor patients as a complementary or alternative treatment option. However, due to metabolization of amygdalin to cyanide (HCN) following oral consumption, there could be a high risk of lactic acidosis caused by cyanide intoxication. The present retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate cyanide blood and lactate plasma levels of tumor patients (n = 55) before and after intravenous (i.v.) amygdalin infusion. All patients had also continuously ingested amygdalin tablets (3 x 500 mg/day), excepting on the days of i.v. administration. Each patient received one to five intravenous amygdalin treatments. The time period between each i.v. application ranged between 4-6 days. The initial i.v. dose was 6 mg (n = 28), 9 mg (n = 1), 15 mg (n = 1) or 18 mg (n = 25). The mean cyanide blood level before i.v. amygdalin administration was 34.74 µg/L, which increased significantly to a mean value of 66.20 µg/L after i. v. amygdalin application. In contrast, lactate decreased significantly from 1266 µmol/L pre-infusion to 868 µmol/L post-infusion. Increasing i.v. amygdalin by 1 mg was also associated with a significant increase in the cyanide level, while the lactate blood level significantly decreased. This is the first study evaluating cyanide levels under conditions employed by amygdalin administrators, i.e. after chronic oral amygdalin intake and then again after a closely subsequent intravenous amygdalin administration. Since lactate decreased, whilst cyanide increased, it is concluded that elevation of cyanide does not induce metabolic acidosis in terms of an increased lactate level.

Use of complementary and alternative medicine before and after organ removal due to urologic cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Many patients use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) as primary treatment or symptom relief for a variety of illnesses. This study was designed to investigate the influence of surgical removal of a tumor-bearing urogenital organ on CAM use. METHODS: From 2007 to 2011, 350 patients underwent major urological surgery for kidney, prostate, or bladder cancer at the Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany. Data from 172 patients (49%), who returned a questionnaire, were retrospectively evaluated using the hospital information system along with the questionnaire to objectify CAM use 2 years before and after surgery. RESULTS: From the 172 patients returning questionnaires, 56 (33%) used CAM before and/or after surgery and 116 (67%) never used CAM. Of the 56 CAM users, 30 (54%) used CAM presurgery and 53 (95%) used CAM postsurgery, indicating a significant change of mind about CAM use. Patients of German nationality used CAM significantly more than patients of other nationalities. Higher educational status (high-school diploma or higher) was a significant factor in favor of CAM use. The most common type of CAM used before/after surgery was an alternative medical system (63/49%), a manipulative and body-based method (50/19%), and a biological-based therapy (37/32%). Information about CAM, either provided by medical professionals or by other sources, was the main reason determining whether patients used CAM or not. CONCLUSION: The number of patients using CAM almost doubled after surgical removal of a cancer-bearing organ. Better awareness and understanding of CAM use by medical professionals could improve patient counseling.