Which Men Do or Do Not Achieve Long-Term Symptom Relief After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP): 11 Years of HoLEP Experience.

Purpose: Apart from the existing level-one evidence, few centers have reported on long-term outcomes after Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP). Against this backdrop we aimed to report on our treatment experience and identify predictors of persistent/recurrent lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after the procedure. Materials and Methods: From 2006 to 2017, 2566 men underwent HoLEP at our institution. Only patients with available, cross-sectional follow-up (F/u) ≥6 months were included. Perioperative and F/u characteristics were compared by duration of F/u in months (quartiles). Multivariable logistic regression models (MVAs) were used to identify predictors of persistent/recurring symptoms, defined as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) >7 at F/u. Results: A total of 774 patients with a median age of 70 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 66-75), prostate volume of 80 mL (IQR = 60-105), American Society of Anesthesiologists score 2 (IQR = 2-3), IPSS of 19 (IQR = 14-24), and quality of life (QoL) of 4 (3-5) at the time of operation were analyzed. Median F/u was 52 months (IQR = 32-77), overall current median prostate-specific antigen was 0.91 mg/dL (0.5-1.8), median IPSS and QoL were 3 (IQR = 1-7) and 1 (IQR 0-2), respectively. LUTS medication was present in 20 patients (2.6%), 15 (2%) patients required reoperation, and permanent urinary incontinence was present in 17 (2.2%) patients. On MVA age at operation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.1; p = 0.013), prostate volume (OR = 0.99 [95% CI, 0.98-0.99;], p = 0.003), body mass index (OR = 1.06 [95% CI, 1.0-1.1], p = 0.043), presence of indwelling catheter (OR = 0.51 [95% CI, 0.32-0.81], p = 0.004), and anticholinergics before procedure (OR = 1.74 [95% CI, 1.01-3.0], p = 0.046) were predictors of persistent/recurring symptoms. Conclusions: Our HoLEP experience confirms durable and profound symptom relief in the vast majority men. A small fraction of patients complained about subjective persistent/recurring LUTS stressing the need for proper patient selection and timing of surgical intervention.

Prospective analysis of artificial urinary sphincter AMS 800 implantation after buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze functional outcomes and complication rates of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in patients who had undergone buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty (BMGU) beforehand. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospectively maintained single-center database comprises data from 236 patients from 2009 to 2015 who underwent AUS implantation. A total of 17 patients after BMGU were available for analysis. Primary endpoints consisted of continence and complication rates. Continence was defined as no use of safety pads, social continence as < 2 pads per day. Stricture recurrence was defined as a decrease in uroflowmetry, a maximum flow rate < 10 ml/s or residual urine volume (> 100 ml). Kaplan-Meier analysis determined explantation-free survival. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 24 months (interquartile range [IQR] 6-31 months). Indication for AUS implantation was severe urinary incontinence with a history of radical prostatectomy (RRP) in 8 (47.1%), trauma in 1 (5.9%) and TUR-P in 8 (47.1%) patients. Pelvic irradiation was reported in 13 (76.5%) cases. The median length of buccal mucosa graft for urethroplasty was 4 cm (3-5 cm). A double cuff was implanted in 14 patients (82.4%), 3 patients received a single cuff. Complete and social continence was achieved in 76.5% and 100% of the patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in complications and explantation-free survival (log-rank, p = 0.191) between patients who had undergone BMGU before AUS compared to patients with no history of BMGU. CONCLUSIONS: According to the prospective follow-up data in a homogenous cohort, AUS implantation seems to be a viable, safe and effective therapeutic strategy for incontinence treatment despite previous BMGU.