Rivaroxaban Monotherapy vs Combination Therapy With Antiplatelets on Total Thrombotic and Bleeding Events in Atrial Fibrillation With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Post Hoc Secondary Analysis of the AFIRE Trial.

Importance: Appropriate regimens of antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD) have not yet been established. Objective: To compare the total number of thrombotic and/or bleeding events between rivaroxaban monotherapy and combined rivaroxaban and antiplatelet therapy in such patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a post hoc secondary analysis of the Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events With Rivaroxaban in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease (AFIRE) open-label, randomized clinical trial. This multicenter analysis was conducted from February 23, 2015, to July 31, 2018. Patients with AF and stable CAD who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting 1 or more years earlier or who had angiographically confirmed CAD not requiring revascularization were enrolled. Data were analyzed from September 1, 2020, to March 26, 2021. Interventions: Rivaroxaban monotherapy or combined rivaroxaban and antiplatelet therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The total incidence of thrombotic, bleeding, and fatal events was compared between the groups. Cox regression analyses were used to estimate the risk of subsequent events in the 2 groups, with the status of thrombotic or bleeding events that had occurred by the time of death used as a time-dependent variable. Results: A total of 2215 patients (mean [SD] age, 74 [8.2] years; 1751 men [79.1%]) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The total event rates for the rivaroxaban monotherapy group (1107 [50.0%]) and the combination-therapy group (1108 [50.0%]) were 12.2% (135 of 1107) and 19.2% (213 of 1108), respectively, during a median follow-up of 24.1 (IQR, 17.3-31.5) months. The mortality rate was 3.7% (41 of 1107) in the monotherapy group and 6.6% (73 of 1108) in the combination-therapy group. Rivaroxaban monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of total events compared with combination therapy (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.80; P < .001). Monotherapy was an independent factor associated with a lower risk of subsequent events compared with combination therapy. The mortality risk after a bleeding event (monotherapy, 75% [6 of 8]; combination therapy, 62.1% [18 of 29]) was higher than that after a thrombotic event (monotherapy, 25% [2 of 8]; combination therapy, 37.9% [11 of 29]). Conclusions and Relevance: Rivaroxaban monotherapy was associated with lower risks of total thrombotic and/or bleeding events than combination therapy in patients with AF and stable CAD. Tapered antithrombotic therapy with a sole anticoagulant should be considered in these patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02642419.

The impact of kidney function in patients on antithrombotic therapy: a post hoc subgroup analysis focusing on recurrent bleeding events from the AFIRE trial.

BACKGROUND: The success of antithrombotic therapies is assessed based on thrombotic and bleeding events. Simultaneously assessing both kinds of events might be challenging, and recurrent bleeding events are often ignored. We tried to confirm the effects of kidney function on outcome events in patients undergoing antithrombotic therapy. METHODS: As a post hoc subgroup analysis of the Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events with Rivaroxaban in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease (AFIRE) trial, a randomized clinical trial with a median follow-up of 36 months, patients were divided into high and low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) groups with a cutoff value of 50 mL/min. The cumulative incidence of bleeding and crude incidence of recurrent bleeding per 100 patient-years were calculated. We used the Cox regression model with multiple failure time data for recurrent bleeding events. RESULTS: Among 2092 patients, 1386 (66.3%) showed high eGFR. The cumulative bleeding events per 100 patients at 1 year were 5.4 and 6.2 in the high and low eGFR groups, respectively. The difference continued to increase over time. The hazard ratio for time to the first bleeding event in the high eGFR group was 0.875 (95% confidence interval 0.701-1.090, p = .234) and that for the first composite event was 0.723 (95% confidence interval 0.603-0.867, p < .000). The recurrent bleeding events per 100 person-years were 11.3 and 15.3 in the high and low eGFR groups, respectively, with a rate ratio of 0.738 (95% confidence interval 0.615-0.886, p = .001). During the observation period, the risk of bleeding changed with time. It peaked soon after the study enrollment in both groups. It decreased continuously in the high eGFR group but remained high in the low eGFR group. CONCLUSIONS: We reaffirmed that kidney function affects bleeding events in patients on antithrombotic therapy, considering recurrent events. Patients should have detailed discussions with physicians regarding the possible bleeding events when continuing antithrombotic therapy, especially in patients with decreased kidney function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000016612 . ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02642419 . Registered on 21 October 2015.

Antithrombotic Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Prior Atherothrombotic Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis of the AFIRE Trial.

Background Among patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease, those with histories of atherothrombotic disease are at high-risk for future ischemic events. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban monotherapy in patients with atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, and histories of atherothrombotic disease. Methods and Results This was a post hoc subanalysis of the AFIRE (Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events With Rivaroxaban in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease) trial. Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease were recruited and randomized to receive the rivaroxaban monotherapy or combination therapy with rivaroxaban plus antiplatelet drug. For the purpose of this sub-study, participants were divided into 2 subgroups, including the atherothrombosis group (those with histories of myocardial infarction, stroke, and/or peripheral artery disease; n=1052, 47.5%) and non-atherothrombosis group (n=1163, 52.5%). The efficacy end point included cardiovascular events or all-cause death, while the safety end point was major bleeding. Net adverse events consisted of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or major bleeding. In the atherothrombosis group, rivaroxaban monotherapy was significantly associated with a lower risk of net adverse events when compared with combination therapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.34-0.74; P<0.001), with a decrease in both efficacy (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47-0.99; P=0.044) and safety (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.71; P=0.003) end points. By contrast, there were no differences between treatment outcomes for the non-atherothrombosis group. Conclusions Rivaroxaban monotherapy significantly reduced net adverse events as compared with combination therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, and prior atherothrombotic disease. Registration URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; Unique identifier: UMIN000016612. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02642419.

Aspirin versus P2Y12 inhibitors with anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) can be treated with multiple antithrombotic therapies including antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies; however, this has the potential to increase bleeding risk. Here, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of P2Y12 inhibitors and aspirin in patients also receiving anticoagulant therapy. METHODS: We evaluated patients from the Atrial Fibrillation and Ischaemic Events with Rivaroxaban in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease (AFIRE) trial who received rivaroxaban plus an antiplatelet agent; the choice of antiplatelet agent was left to the physician's discretion. The primary efficacy and safety end points, consistent with those of the AFIRE trial, were compared between P2Y12 inhibitors and aspirin groups. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring revascularisation or death from any cause. The primary safety end point was major bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. RESULTS: A total of 1075 patients were included (P2Y12 inhibitor group, n=297; aspirin group, n=778). Approximately 60% of patients were administered proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and there was no significant difference in PPI use in the groups. There were no significant differences in the primary end points between the groups (efficacy: HR 1.31; 95% CI 0.88 to 1.94; p=0.178; safety: HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.43 to 1.47; p=0.456). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in cardiovascular and bleeding events in patients with AF and stable CAD taking rivaroxaban with P2Y12 inhibitors or aspirin in the chronic phase. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000016612; NCT02642419.

Rivaroxaban monotherapy versus combination therapy according to patient risk of stroke and bleeding in atrial fibrillation and stable coronary disease: AFIRE trial subanalysis.

BACKGROUND: In the AFIRE trial, rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to combination therapy with rivaroxaban and an antiplatelet agent for thromboembolic events or death, and superior for major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease. Little is known about impacts of stroke and bleeding risks on the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban monotherapy. METHODS: In this subanalysis of the AFIRE trial, we assessed the risk of stroke and bleeding by the CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scores. The primary efficacy end point was the composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina requiring revascularization, or death from any cause. The primary safety end point was major bleeding defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. RESULTS: Rivaroxaban monotherapy significantly reduced the primary efficacy and safety end points with no evidence of differential effects by stroke risk (CHADS2, p for interaction = 0.727 for efficacy, 0.395 for safety; CHA2DS2-VASc, p for interaction = 0.740 for efficacy, 0.265 for safety) or bleeding risk (HAS-BLED, p for interaction = 0.581 for efficacy, 0.225 for safety). There was also no evidence of statistical heterogeneity across patient risk categories for other end points; stroke or systemic embolism, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, MI, MI or unstable angina, death from any cause, any bleeding, or net adverse clinical events. CONCLUSIONS: The advantages of rivaroxaban monotherapy compared with those of combination therapy with respect to all prespecified end points, including thromboembolism, bleeding, and mortality were similar across patients with AF and stable coronary artery disease, irrespective of their risk for stroke and bleeding. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number, UMIN000016612, and ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02642419.

Cognitive function in post-cardiac intensive care: patient characteristics and impact of multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation.

New/worsening cognitive and physical impairments following critical care pose significant problems. Multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation (CR) can improve physical function after cardiac intensive care (CIC). This observational study aimed to evaluate cognitive function in patients participating in multidisciplinary CR and to identify correlates of impaired cognitive function after CIC. We analyzed 111 consecutive patients admitted to our comprehensive care ward at least 7 days after CIC and assessed factors associated with cognitive function using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Patients were stratified into two groups based on the median FIM-Cognitive scores: impaired (n = 56) and preserved cognition (n = 55) groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified age [odds ratio (OR) 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.13; p = 0.042], Mini-Nutrition Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF; OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.56-0.95; p = 0.017), and FIM-Physical scores (OR: 0.94; 95% CI 0.90-0.99; p = 0.012) as significant and independent factors associated with impaired cognition. The median length of hospital stay was 28 (interquartile range: 18, 43) days. The FIM-Cognitive and FIM-Physical scores significantly increased from admission to discharge [32.0 (27.0, 35.0) vs. 34.0 (29.0, 35.0) points; p < 0.001; 67.0 (53.0, 75.0) vs. 85.0 (73.5, 89.0) points; p < 0.001, respectively]. On subgroup analysis within the impaired cognition group, increased FIM-Cognitive scores positively and significantly correlated with increased FIM-Physical scores (ρ = 0.450; p = 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis identified atrial fibrillation (AF; ß = - 0.29; p = 0.016), ln(glycated hemoglobin; HbA1c) (ß = 0.29; p = 0.018), and ln(high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; hs-CRP) (ß = - 0.26; p = 0.034) as significant and independent factors correlated with increased FIM-Cognitive scores. In conclusion, advanced age, low MNA-SF score, and FIM-Physical score were independent factors associated with impaired cognition in post-CIC patients. Multidisciplinary CR improved both physical and cognitive functions, and AF, HbA1c, and hs-CRP were independent factors correlated with increased FIM-Cognitive score.

Associations between corrected serum calcium and phosphorus levels and outcome in dialysis patients in the Kumamoto Prefecture.

INTRODUCTION: Mortality in hemodialysis patients is relatively high; thus, its risk stratification is very important. There are insufficient data describing the current status of the management of serum phosphate and calcium levels. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, registry study throughout the Kumamoto Prefecture in Japan. We enrolled 1993 patients at 58 facilities with complete explanatory data, including serum phosphate, corrected calcium, and intact parathyroid hormone levels. We categorized subjects into nine categories according to low, normal, and high levels of phosphate and corrected calcium levels. The endpoint was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Of the total number of subjects, 56.1% of the patients were in the normal phosphate and calcium category, and 72% and 77.1% had controlled serum phosphate and calcium levels, respectively. Two hundred twenty-six deaths occurred during the follow-up period. In the nine categories, the highest mortality rates were observed in the highest corrected calcium and lowest phosphate categories. Stepwise backward multivariate regression analyses identified the serum corrected calcium level (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.06-1.79; P = 0.016) and the serum phosphate level (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08-1.48; P = 0.003) as significant and independent predictors of all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The corrected serum calcium and phosphate levels are associated with mortality in our dialysis population, with poorest survival in patients with high corrected serum calcium and low serum phosphorus.

Antithrombotic Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation with Stable Coronary Disease.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data from randomized trials evaluating the use of antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease. METHODS: In a multicenter, open-label trial conducted in Japan, we randomly assigned 2236 patients with atrial fibrillation who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) more than 1 year earlier or who had angiographically confirmed coronary artery disease not requiring revascularization to receive monotherapy with rivaroxaban (a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant) or combination therapy with rivaroxaban plus a single antiplatelet agent. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring revascularization, or death from any cause; this end point was analyzed for noninferiority with a noninferiority margin of 1.46. The primary safety end point was major bleeding, according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis; this end point was analyzed for superiority. RESULTS: The trial was stopped early because of increased mortality in the combination-therapy group. Rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to combination therapy for the primary efficacy end point, with event rates of 4.14% and 5.75% per patient-year, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 0.95; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Rivaroxaban monotherapy was superior to combination therapy for the primary safety end point, with event rates of 1.62% and 2.76% per patient-year, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.89; P = 0.01 for superiority). CONCLUSIONS: As antithrombotic therapy, rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to combination therapy for efficacy and superior for safety in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease. (Funded by the Japan Cardiovascular Research Foundation; AFIRE UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number, UMIN000016612; and ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02642419.).

Differential effectiveness of ARB plus CCB therapy and high-dose ARB therapy in high-risk elderly hypertensive patients: subanalysis of the OSCAR study.

The OSCAR study was a multicenter prospective randomized study that examined the relative benefit of combined ARB (olmesartan 20 mg per day) plus calcium channel blocker (CCB) therapy vs. high-dose ARB monotherapy (olmesartan 40 mg per day) for prevention of cardiovascular events in elderly Japanese hypertensive patients. The present subanalysis of patients enrolled in the OSCAR study (n = 1078) was performed to assess whether baseline eGFR coupled with cardiovascular disease (CVD) could predict the relative benefit of these two treatments. Patients with baseline CVD (n = 769) and patients without baseline CVD (n = 309) were divided into two groups based on baseline eGFR; (i) patients with eGFR of < 60 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-)(2) and (ii) those with eGFR of ⩾ 60 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2). There was a significant treatment-subgroup interaction among these four subgroups in relation to the incidence of primary outcome events(P = 0.007 for interaction). In patients with CVD and with eGFR of <60 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2), ARB plus CCB therapy was associated with a lower incidence of primary events than high-dose ARB therapy and the difference of the relative risk was statistically significant (hazard ratio: 3.525, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.676-7.412, P < 0.001). The greater benefit of ARB plus CCB therapy vs. high-dose ARB therapy in this subgroup was associated with less visit-to-visit variability of systolic BP and diastolic BP. In conclusion, baseline eGFR coupled with baseline CVD seems to be a predictor of the relative efficacy of ARB plus CCB therapy vs. high-dose ARB therapy in the elderly hypertensive patients. ARB plus CCB therapy appears to be superior to high-dose ARB therapy for preventing cardiovascular events in the patients with CVD and with eGFR of <60 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2).

Importance of pericardial fat in the formation of complex fractionated atrial electrogram region in atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Pericardial fat (PF) and complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) are both associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, we examined the relation between PF and CFAE area in AF. METHODS: The study population included 120 control patients without AF and 120 patients with AF (80 paroxysmal AF and 40 persistent AF) who underwent catheter ablation. Total cardiac PF volume, representing all adipose tissue within the pericardial sac, was measured by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. The location and distribution of CFAE region were identified by left atrial endocardial mapping using a three-dimensional mapping system. We analyzed the significance of total cardiac PF volume and total area of CFAE region on AF, persistence of AF from paroxysmal to persistent form, and the relation between total cardiac PF volume and total CFAE area. We also evaluated the regional distribution of PF volume and CFAE area in five areas of the left atrium (LA). RESULTS: Total cardiac PF volume correlated with AF (odds ratio [OR]: 1.024, p<0.001). Total cardiac PF volume and total CFAE area were both independently associated with persistence of AF (OR: 1.018, p=0.018, OR: 1.144, p=0.002, respectively). Multivariate linear regression analysis identified total cardiac PF volume as a significant and independent determinant of total CFAE area (r=0.488, p<0.001). Furthermore, regional PF volume correlated with local CFAE area in an each LA area. CONCLUSIONS: PF volume correlated significantly with CFAE area in patients with AF. This finding suggests that PF is directly related to the progression of CFAE area and promotes the pathogenic process of AF.

Sex differences in response to angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in elderly, high-risk, hypertensive Japanese patients: a subanalysis of the OSCAR study.

The OlmeSartan Calcium Antagonists Randomized (OSCAR) study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded, end point study of elderly hypertensive Japanese patients that compared the efficacy of a high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) treatment to an ARB plus calcium channel blocker (CCB) combination. In this pre-specified subgroup analysis, we compared the response to such therapy according to sex. A total of 1164 patients (515 (44%) men and 649 (56%) women) were included, and each gender was split into two nearly equal treatment groups. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular events and non-cardiovascular death. The baseline characteristics between the two treatment groups in each sex were similar, except for some variables. Male patients had lower systolic and higher diastolic blood pressure than female patients (156.8/85.7 vs. 158.5/84.2 mm Hg). At the end of the study, the mean systolic pressure was higher in the ARB group (134.4 mm Hg) than in the ARB plus CCB group (131.5 mm Hg; P=0.03) for men but not for women (135.4 vs. 133.4 mm Hg; P=0.12). For men, the primary outcome events tended to be higher in the ARB group than in the ARB plus CCB group (hazard ratio (HR)=1.66; P=0.055) but not for women (HR=0.97; P=0.92). This difference in men was due to cardiovascular events (HR=1.86; P=0.03). The interaction between sex and treatment group was not significant (P=0.17). These findings suggest that, in addition to blood pressure control, appropriate patient risk assessment is important for the treatment of hypertension, especially in male patients, as opposed to possible sex differences in treatment effects.

An angiotensin II receptor blocker-calcium channel blocker combination prevents cardiovascular events in elderly high-risk hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease better than high-dose angiotensin II receptor blockade alone.

The OSCAR study was a multicenter, prospective randomized open-label blinded end-point study of 1164 Japanese elderly hypertensive patients comparing the efficacy of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) uptitration to an ARB plus calcium channel blocker (CCB) combination. In this prospective study, we performed prespecified subgroup analysis according to baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with chronic kidney disease (CKD) defined as an eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). Blood pressure was lower in the combined therapy than in the high-dose ARB cohort in both groups with and without CKD. In patients with CKD, significantly more primary events (a composite of cardiovascular events and noncardiovascular death) occurred in the high-dose ARB group than in the combination group (30 vs. 16, respectively, hazard ratio 2.25). Significantly more cerebrovascular and more heart failure events occurred in the high-dose ARB group than in the combination group. In patients without CKD, however, the incidence of primary events was similar between the two treatments. The treatment-by-subgroup interaction was significant. Allocation to the high-dose ARB was a significant independent prognostic factor for primary events in patients with CKD. Thus, the ARB plus CCB combination conferred greater benefit in prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with CKD compared with high-dose ARB alone. Our findings provide new insight into the antihypertensive strategy for elderly hypertensive patients with CKD.

Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in Japanese elderly, high-risk, hypertensive patients.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy or angiotensin II receptor blocker + calcium channel blocker combination therapy is better in elderly hypertensive patients with high cardiovascular risk. The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of these treatments in elderly, high-risk Japanese hypertensive patients. METHODS: The OlmeSartan and Calcium Antagonists Randomized (OSCAR) study was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point study of 1164 hypertensive patients aged 65 to 84 years with type 2 diabetes or cardiovascular disease. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension during treatment with olmesartan 20 mg/d were randomly assigned to receive 40 mg/d olmesartan (high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker) or a calcium channel blocker + 20 mg/d olmesartan (angiotensin II receptor blocker + calcium channel blocker). The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular events and noncardiovascular death. RESULTS: During a 3-year follow-up, blood pressure was significantly lower in the angiotensin II receptor blocker + calcium channel blocker group than in the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker group. Mean blood pressure at 36 months was 135.0/74.3 mm Hg in the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker group and 132.6/72.6 mm Hg in the angiotensin II receptor blocker + calcium channel blocker group. More primary end points occurred in the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker group than in the angiotensin II receptor blocker + calcium channel blocker group (58 vs 48 events, hazard ratio [HR], 1.31, 95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.92; P=.17). In patients with cardiovascular disease at baseline, more primary events occurred in the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker group (HR, 1.63, P=.03); in contrast, fewer events were observed in the subgroup without cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.52, P=.14). This treatment-by-subgroup interaction was significant (P=.02). CONCLUSION: The angiotensin II receptor blocker and calcium channel blocker combination lowered blood pressure more than the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker and reduced the incidence of primary end points more than the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker in patients with cardiovascular disease. The addition of a second antihypertensive agent is more effective at lowering blood pressure than simply doubling the dose of an existing agent.

Rosuvastatin combined with regular exercise preserves coenzyme Q10 levels associated with a significant increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Coenzyme Q10 levels are low in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and increasing or preserving coenzyme Q10 could be a beneficial strategy. Exercise and statins improve high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels. However, statins inhibit coenzyme Q10 biosynthesis, and the combination of statins with coenzyme Q10 supplementation increases HDL-C compared to statins alone. We compared the effects of two statins (rosuvastatin and atorvastatin) combined with exercise on coenzyme Q10 and HDL-C levels in CAD patients. METHODS: After randomizing 28 CAD patients to rosuvastatin (n=14) and atorvastatin (n=14) groups, patients performed weekly in-hospital aerobic exercise and daily home exercise for 20 weeks. We measured serum lipids, ubiquinol, and exercise capacity. RESULTS: Both statins equally improved exercise capacity and lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Rosuvastatin significantly increased HDL-C (rosuvastatin, +12 ± 9 mg/dL [+30%], atorvastatin, +5 ± 5 mg/dL [+13%], p=0.014) and apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) (rosuvastatin, +28.3 ± 20.7 mg/dL, atorvastatin, +13.4 ± 12.0 mg/dL, p=0.030) compared to atorvastatin. Atorvastatin significantly decreased serum ubiquinol (731 ± 238 to 547 ± 219 nmol/L, p=0.001), but rosuvastatin (680±233 to 668 ± 299 nmol/L, p=0.834) did not. There was a significant positive correlation between changes in ubiquinol and ApoA1 (r=0.518, p=0.005). Multivariate regression analysis showed that changes in ubiquinol correlated significantly with changes in ApoA1 after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and smoking (ß=0.502, p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to atorvastatin, rosuvastatin combined with exercise significantly preserved ubiquinol levels associated with an increase in HDL-C. Rosuvastatin with regular exercise could be beneficial for CAD patients.

Rationale, design and patient baseline characteristics of OlmeSartan and calcium antagonists randomized (OSCAR) study: a study comparing the incidence of cardiovascular events between high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) monotherapy and combination therapy of ARB with calcium channel blocker in Japanese elderly high-risk hypertensive patients (ClinicalTrials. gov no. NCT00134160).

Higher doses of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are expected to exert more protective effects against cardiovascular diseases. However, the significance of treatment of hypertension with high-dose ARB remains to be defined. The OlmeSartan and Calcium Antagonists Randomized (OSCAR) Study was designed to determine whether high-dose ARB monotherapy is superior to the combination therapy of ARB plus calcium channel blocker (CCB) in the prevention of cardiovascular morbidity/mortality in Japanese elderly high-risk hypertensive patients. The OSCAR study is a multicenter, active-controlled, two-arm parallel group comparison, using the prospective randomized open-blinded end-point method. In the 'Step 1' period, elderly hypertensive patients with diabetes or cardiovascular disease received monotherapy with ARB olmesartan medoxomil at a dose of 20 mg day(-1). If the target blood pressure control (less than 140/90 mm Hg) was not achieved by ARB monotherapy, the patients were randomized to receive either (1) the increased dose of olmesartan at 40 mg day(-1) (high-dose ARB monotherapy) or (2) the addition of a CCB (amlodipine or azelnidipine) to 20 mg day(-1) olmesartan (ARB plus CCB combination) in the 'Step 2' period. The follow-up duration will be 3 years. The primary end points will be the composite of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events, and death from any cause. Recruitment for the OSCAR study (around 1200 patients) was completed by the end of May 2007. The OSCAR study is the first large clinical trial comparing the efficacy of high-dose ARB monotherapy with that of an ARB plus CCB combination therapy in elderly high-risk hypertensive patients.

Clinical training: a simulation program for phlebotomy.

BACKGROUND: Basic clinical skills training in the Japanese medical education system has traditionally incorporated on-the-job training with patients. Recently, the complementary use of simulation techniques as part of this training has gained popularity. It is not known, however, whether the participants view this new type of education program favorably; nor is the impact of this program known. In this study we developed a new simulation-based training program in phlebotomy for new medical residents and assessed their satisfaction with the program METHODS: The education program comprised two main components: simulator exercise sessions and the actual drawing of blood from other trainees. At the end of the session, we surveyed participant sentiment regarding the program. RESULTS: There were 43 participants in total. In general, they were highly satisfied with the education program, with all survey questions receiving scores of 3 or more on a scale of 1-5 (mean range: 4.3 - 4.8), with 5 indicating the highest level of satisfaction. Additionally, their participation as a 'patient' for their co-trainees was undertaken willingly and was deemed to be a valuable experience. CONCLUSION: We developed and tested an education program using a simulator for blood collection. We demonstrated a high satisfaction level among the participants for this unique educational program and expect that it will improve medical training, patient safety, and quality of care. The development and dissemination of similar educational programs involving simulation for other basic clinical skills will be undertaken in the future.