Evaluating the implementation of the Birmingham Symptom-specific Obstetric Triage System (BSOTS) in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Obstetric triage is usually undertaken by a midwife and involves conducting a physical assessment to identify a woman's presenting problem. The Birmingham Symptom-specific Obstetric Triage System (BSOTS) was developed in the United Kingdom (UK) to overcome challenges associated with triaging women by standardising the maternity triage process. The Australian study site is the first hospital outside the UK to implement this approach. AIM: To evaluate the implementation of the BSOTS in an Australian tertiary maternity service. METHODS: A multi-method approach including pre-implementation BSOTS education evaluations (n = 26), post-implementation clinical data audit (n = 660), and staff focus groups (n = 9) was undertaken. Participants included midwives who worked in the Maternity Assessment Centre. Data of women who had attended the service during BSOTS implementation was analysed in the audit component. FINDINGS: Staff valued the BSOTS standardised approach to maternity triage, particularly for midwives new to the role. The retrospective audit showed that time to triage and time to care outcomes for women improved from pre-implementation audits and were mostly adhering to auditable standards. Lack of knowledge amongst staff (especially medical staff) regarding the BSOTS was considered a barrier to the effective flow of care of women through the centre. DISCUSSION: The BSOTS is a useful approach for prioritising women's care. Ensuring that all staff are aware of the system and its benefits is likely to enhance implementation and improve triage outcomes. CONCLUSION: The BSOTS is an innovative midwife led practice change that is applicable to the Australian context, and benefits women, midwives, and the maternity service.

Organizational strategies to optimize women's safety during labor and birth: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Safety is a priority for organizations that provide maternity care, however, preventable harm and errors in maternity care remain. Maternity care is considered a high risk and high litigation area of health care. To mitigate risk and litigation, organizations have implemented strategies to optimize women's safety. Our objectives were to identify the strategies implemented by organizations to optimize women's safety during labor and birth, and to consider how the concept of safety is operationalized to measure and evaluate outcomes of these strategies. METHOD: This scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review Methodology. Published peer-reviewed literature indexed in CINAHL, Medline, and Embase, databases from 2010 to 2020, were reviewed for inclusion. Fifty studies were included. Data were extracted and thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Three categories of organizational strategies were identified to optimize women's safety during labor and birth: clinical governance, models of care, and staff education. Clinical governance programs (n = 30 studies), specifically implementing checklists and audits, models of care, such as midwifery led-care (n = 11 studies), and staff training programs (n = 9 studies), were predominately for the management of obstetric emergencies. Outcome measures included morbidity and mortality for woman and newborns. Three studies discussed women's perceptions of safety during labor and birth as an outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS: Organizations utilize a range of strategies to optimize women's safety during labor and birth. The main outcome measure used to evaluate strategies was focused on clinical outcomes for the mother and newborn.