Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Low-Level Light Therapy , Rosacea , Humans , Prospective Studies , Rosacea/radiotherapy , SkinSubject(s)
Dermatitis , Low-Level Light Therapy , Humans , Alopecia/therapy , Cicatrix/therapy , Cicatrix/pathologyABSTRACT
Individuals with chronic illnesses turn to online communities to engage in asynchronous peer-to-peer exchanges to better understand and manage their disease. Messages and advice exchanged by online users with vitiligo are not well characterized. We conducted a qualitative study to explore the content exchanged by individuals with vitiligo in online forums. An interpretive research paradigm was utilized to assess public online forum content. A systematic search using the phrases online forum vitiligo support, vitiligo online message board, and vitiligo forums identified 39 relevant forums; 9 of them met inclusion criteria, with 382 total anonymous users. Major themes and subthemes included vitiligo disease management, homeopathy/home remedies, psychosocial impact, public perceptions, and camouflage/concealment.
Subject(s)
Hypopigmentation , Vitiligo , Chronic Disease , Humans , Internet , Qualitative Research , Vitiligo/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A systematic review failed to identify any systemic therapy used in alopecia areata (AA) where use is supported by robust evidence from high-quality randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVE: To produce an international consensus statement on the use and utility of various treatments for AA. METHODS: Fifty hair experts from 5 continents were invited to participate in a 3-round Delphi process. Agreement of 66% or greater was considered consensus. RESULTS: In the first round, consensus was achieved in 22 of 423 (5%) questions. After a face-to-face meeting in round 3, overall, consensus was achieved for only 130 (33%) treatment-specific questions. There was greater consensus for intralesional treatment of AA (19 [68%]) followed by topical treatment (25 [43%]). Consensus was achieved in 45 (36%) questions pertaining to systemic therapies in AA. The categories with the least consensus were phototherapy and nonprescription therapies. LIMITATIONS: The study included a comprehensive list of systemic treatments for AA but not all treatments used. CONCLUSION: Despite divergent opinions among experts, consensus was achieved on a number of pertinent questions. The concluding statement also highlights areas where expert consensus is lacking and where an international patient registry could enable further research.
Subject(s)
Alopecia Areata/therapy , Administration, Oral , Administration, Topical , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Age Factors , Alopecia Areata/drug therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Complementary Therapies , Delphi Technique , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Expert Testimony , Humans , Injections, Intralesional , Phototherapy , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Melanosis/radiotherapy , Neurocutaneous Syndromes/radiotherapy , Combined Modality Therapy/instrumentation , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Face , Female , Humans , Low-Level Light Therapy/instrumentation , Melanosis/etiology , Middle Aged , Neurocutaneous Syndromes/complications , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta (PLEVA) is a rare, self-limited, cutaneous disorder of unknown etiology. Clinically, PLEVA is characterized by the sudden onset of scaly, erythematous macules and papules localized to the trunk and proximal extremities. We report the case of a patient who presented with multiple erythematous papules and plaques on the palms, forearms, and dorsal feet. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(7):690-691.
Subject(s)
Pityriasis Lichenoides/diagnosis , Skin/pathology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Biopsy , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Phototherapy , Pityriasis Lichenoides/pathology , Pityriasis Lichenoides/therapyABSTRACT
Hair loss is a complicated problem that causes significant concern for those who are affected. Patients seeking medical treatment have limited options that include topical minoxidil and oral finasteride. While these treatments are backed by long term clinical use and research outcomes, many patients find topical minoxidil difficult to incorporate into their daily routine and some are concerned with the side effects associated with finasteride. In the office setting, patients may be treated with more invasive procedures such as platelet-rich plasma injections (PRP) and hair transplantation, treatments that often must be repeated and can lead to a costly investment. Consumers are increasingly interested in natural treatments for hair loss. Many turn to basic supplements only to be disappointed when they fail to deliver due to lack of standardization and efficacy. In this paper we review the benefits of a nutraceutical containing a specific blend of highly purified, standardized, bio-optimized, and bioavailable botanical extracts to treat hair loss. These phytoactives were selected because of their diverse multi-modal biologic activity against inflammation, DHT, stress mediators, oxidative damage, and intermediary signaling cascades. This supplement represents a paradigm shift as it addresses not only the factors that trigger hair loss but the downstream mediators of inflammation as well. Multi-center clinical studies are currently underway to confirm the efficacy and benefits of this unique nutraceutical.
J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(11 Suppl):s141-148.
.Subject(s)
Alopecia/drug therapy , Dietary Supplements , Evidence-Based Medicine , HumansABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Hair loss is a common complaint seen in dermatology clinics. From frustration and attempts at self-help, patients with hair loss may present to the dermatologist with false beliefs, or myths, about the causes of their condition and what treatments are effective.
METHODS: We identified 12 common myths about hair loss, categorized as myths about minoxidil treatment, vitamin and mineral supplements, natural topical treatments, and hair care practices. We performed a PubMed search to find evidence to support or refute each myth.
RESULTS: We found that there is little evidence to support many of these common hair loss myths. In some cases, randomized controlled trials have investigated the effects of particular therapies and point to the effectiveness of certain hair loss treatments.
DISCUSSION: In many cases, there have not been sufficient randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effect of different therapies and hair care practices on hair loss. It is best to guide patients toward treatments with a long track record of efficacy and away from those where little is known scientifically.
J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(7):690-694.
.Subject(s)
Alopecia/diagnosis , Alopecia/drug therapy , Biological Products/administration & dosage , Dietary Supplements , Minoxidil/administration & dosage , Vitamins/administration & dosage , Administration, Topical , Alopecia/chemically induced , Biological Products/adverse effects , Dermatologists/trends , Dietary Supplements/adverse effects , Humans , Minoxidil/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Vitamins/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Female pattern hair loss (FPHL), also known as female androgenic alopecia, affects over 21 million women in the United States with devastating effects on self-esteem and psychosocial functioning. Topical minoxidil 2% and 5% formulations are the only US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments for FPHL. The length of time it typically takes to observe the benefits is a challenge for many patients, and may affect adherence to treatment. Herbal extracts, which are also believed to promote healthier-looking hair, have a long history of use in hair care formulations. The safety and efficacy of a twice-daily regimen of 2% minoxidil solution used in combination with the botanical hair solution for 12 weeks in 54 subjects was evaluated in a multicenter, single-arm, open-label study. Assessments included investigator and subject ratings of improvement and subject satisfaction. Investigator ratings indicated significant improvement in hair growth and overall treatment benefits in as early as 6 weeks (P<.001). Subject self-ratings indicated significant satisfaction with hair volume and quality improvement at week 6 (P<.001). Subjects also indicated an increase in self-confidence and attractiveness at week 12 (P<.001). The investigator and subject-assessed efficacy and subject satisfaction with this regimen provides clinicians with an effective treatment option for FPHL that also provides a high level of patient acceptance, which ultimately may help promote minoxidil treatment adherence.
Subject(s)
Alopecia/diagnosis , Alopecia/drug therapy , Hair Preparations/administration & dosage , Minoxidil/administration & dosage , Plant Extracts/administration & dosage , Adult , Drug Compounding , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Hair Preparations/chemistry , Humans , Middle Aged , Minoxidil/chemistry , Patient Satisfaction , Pharmaceutical Solutions/administration & dosage , Pharmaceutical Solutions/chemistry , Plant Extracts/chemistry , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a common skin disease in Caucasians but less common in African-Americans. AIMS: Our aim is to evaluate caregiver opinions regarding the clinical presentations and treatment of psoriasis in African-Americans compared to Caucasians. PATIENTS/METHODS: A survey was sent to 29 dermatologists who are opinion leaders in the field of psoriasis. The survey included a number of questions regarding the characteristics of the patients seen in their practice. RESULTS: A total of 29 surveys were completed and returned. All of the dermatologists use the extent of disease as a criterion to determine the severity of the disease. Other criteria include scale, thickness, erythema, associated general symptoms, and dyspigmentation. About 66% of the respondents reported the different manifestations of disease, such as more dyspigmentation, thicker plaques, and less erythema in African-Americans. The most common first-line treatments for mild to moderate disease were highpotency topical steroids (68%) followed by topical vitamin D analogues (41%). For moderate to severe disease, the most commonly used first-line treatments were high-potency topical steroids (54%) and phototherapy (46%). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical manifestations of psoriasis in African-Americans are not exactly the same as in Caucasians. Physicians should be aware of the difference in clinical manifestations in African-Americans. Further research and large-scale studies are necessary to elucidate the differences in the clinical presentation, natural course of the disease, and the criteria used for the evaluation of severity among ethnic groups.
Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Psoriasis/epidemiology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Caregivers , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Dermatology/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Phototherapy/methods , Psoriasis/ethnology , Psoriasis/nursing , Psoriasis/pathology , Severity of Illness Index , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Alopecia areata (AA) is a nonscarring, autoimmune, inflammatory, hair loss on the scalp, and/or body. Etiology and pathogenesis are still unknown. The most common site affected is the scalp. Histopathology is characterized by an increased number of the catagen and telogen follicles, the presence of inflammatory lymphocytic infiltrate in the peribulbar region ("swarm of bees"). Corticosteroids are the most popular drugs for the treatment of this disease. Etiologic and pathogenic mechanisms, as well as other current treatments available will be discussed in this article.