Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 83(1): 123-130, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32165196

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A systematic review failed to identify any systemic therapy used in alopecia areata (AA) where use is supported by robust evidence from high-quality randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVE: To produce an international consensus statement on the use and utility of various treatments for AA. METHODS: Fifty hair experts from 5 continents were invited to participate in a 3-round Delphi process. Agreement of 66% or greater was considered consensus. RESULTS: In the first round, consensus was achieved in 22 of 423 (5%) questions. After a face-to-face meeting in round 3, overall, consensus was achieved for only 130 (33%) treatment-specific questions. There was greater consensus for intralesional treatment of AA (19 [68%]) followed by topical treatment (25 [43%]). Consensus was achieved in 45 (36%) questions pertaining to systemic therapies in AA. The categories with the least consensus were phototherapy and nonprescription therapies. LIMITATIONS: The study included a comprehensive list of systemic treatments for AA but not all treatments used. CONCLUSION: Despite divergent opinions among experts, consensus was achieved on a number of pertinent questions. The concluding statement also highlights areas where expert consensus is lacking and where an international patient registry could enable further research.


Subject(s)
Alopecia Areata/therapy , Administration, Oral , Administration, Topical , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Age Factors , Alopecia Areata/drug therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Complementary Therapies , Delphi Technique , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Expert Testimony , Humans , Injections, Intralesional , Phototherapy , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
2.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 21(5): 603-612, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32066284

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Androgenetic alopecia is a common hair loss disorder affecting up to 80% of males by the age of 80. It is characterized by androgen related progressive thinning of hair in a defined pattern. It results in diminished self-esteem, reduced confidence and distress in affected men, irrespective of age or stage of baldness. An effective treatment for hair baldness is needed.Areas covered: In androgenetic alopecia, hair follicles undergo progressive miniaturization. Genetic factors and androgens are key role-players in disease pathogenesis. Herein the authors review the pharmacologic treatment of androgenetic alopecia, which involves 5 alpha reductase inhibitors, minoxidil and prostaglandins. Non-pharmacologic approaches are also explored.Expert opinion: Androgenetic alopecia progresses over time and although the current available medical treatments like finasteride and minoxidil are effective in arresting the progression of the disease, they allow only partial regrowth of hair at its best. Early treatment achieves a more optimal outcome. Non-pharmacologic treatments like PRP can be considered in patients refractory to medical treatment.Abbreviations: MPHL: male pattern hair loss; AGA: androgenetic alopecia; DHT: dihydrotestosterone; 5AR: 5-alpha-reductase; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; PG's: prostaglandins (PG's); PGD2R: prostaglandin D2 receptor; VPA: valproic aid; SR: Serenoa Repens; PRP: platelet-rich plasma; PDGF: platelet derived growth factor; TGF: transforming growth factor; ERK: extracellular signal-regulated kinase; PKB: protein kinase B; LLLT: low-level laser therapy; ROS: reactive oxygen species; RCT: randomized control trial; SFRP1: secreted frizzled related protein 1; DP: dermal papilla; PDE5: phosphodiesterase 5.


Subject(s)
Alopecia/drug therapy , Finasteride/therapeutic use , Minoxidil/therapeutic use , Prostaglandins/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Administration, Topical , Alopecia/radiotherapy , Dry Needling , Finasteride/administration & dosage , Hair/drug effects , Hair/growth & development , Humans , Low-Level Light Therapy , Male , Minoxidil/administration & dosage , Prostaglandins/administration & dosage , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
4.
Australas J Dermatol ; 59(1): 41-47, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27730628

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The simplified psoriasis index (SPI) is a three-part multidimensional tool incorporating disease severity, psychosocial impact and historical course completed by the health-care professional (professional SPI, [proSPI]) or the patient (self-assessment SPI, [saSPI]). We aimed to assess the validity and response distribution of proSPI and saSPI in patients with psoriasis undergoing phototherapy. METHODS: The validity and response distribution of SPI was assessed by recording saSPI and proSPI in patients with psoriasis before and after a course of phototherapy. Recruitment ended once 100 complete data sets were available for analysis. RESULTS: Altogether 52 of the 100 patients evaluated were male and most (93) underwent narrowband UVB phototherapy. There was a close correlation between the proSPI-current severity score (proSPI-s) with the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score (r = 0.76, r = 0.86) before and after treatment, respectively. Although pretreatment correlation between the saSPI-current severity score (saSPI-s) and PASI was weak (r = 0.39), a more close correlation was noted at the end of treatment (r = 0.50). A moderate correlation was observed between the SPI-psychosocial impact score (SPI-p) and the dermatology life quality index (DLQI), both before and after phototherapy (r = 0.64, r = 0.73). The SPI had wide response distributions in all three domains. CONCLUSIONS: Both versions of SPI demonstrated wide response distributions and the proSPI-s in particular was shown to have good validity with PASI.


Subject(s)
Psoriasis/psychology , Psoriasis/radiotherapy , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Ultraviolet Therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Diagnostic Self Evaluation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Young Adult
5.
Australas J Dermatol ; 57(3): e97-9, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25872701

ABSTRACT

Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy is a rare microangiopathy first described by Salama and Rosenthal in 2000. Several cases have been reported to date, describing distinct histological findings of thick hyaline collagenous blood vessel walls in the superficial dermis. Clinical confusion can arise with generalised essential telangiectasia. We report a case occurring in a 76-year-old woman who presented with a 2-year history of a telangiectatic rash progressing from her knees upwards. The diagnosis was confirmed on skin biopsy and treatment with pulsed dye laser was later initiated at the patient's request.


Subject(s)
Blood Vessels/pathology , Collagen/metabolism , Skin Diseases, Vascular/pathology , Telangiectasis/pathology , Telangiectasis/radiotherapy , Aged , Biopsy, Needle , Chronic Disease , Diagnosis, Differential , Disease Progression , Exanthema/diagnosis , Exanthema/etiology , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Rare Diseases , Skin Diseases, Vascular/diagnosis , Telangiectasis/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL