Long-term results of sorafenib in advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: what can we learn from routine clinical practice?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prospective randomized trials have proven that sorafenib is a valid treatment option for patients with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of sorafenib in patients encountered in routine clinical practice. METHODS: From September 2008 to March 2011, 42 cirrhotic patients (30 male; 12 female; mean age: 70.2 ± 7.6 years; range: 56-85 years) with HCC of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B (n = 5) or C (n = 37; mean size: 66.6 ± 42.3 mm; mean number per patient: 3.3 ± 2.8) were treated with sorafenib at either a standard dose of 800 mg/day (n = 29; 69.1%) or at 400 mg/day with subsequent dose escalation (ramp-up strategy; n = 13, 30.9%). Baseline clinical parameters were comparable. Clinical data and side effects, laboratory analyses (in particular, serum α-fetoprotein) and radiological data (tumor response according to amended RECIST criteria) were assessed every 3 months. Survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 12.2 ± 9 months (range: 1-32 months). Median overall survival was 26.1 months with overall 6- and 12-month survival rates of 92.1 and 85%, respectively. Median time to radiological progression was 8 months. The progression-free rate was 64.3%. Fatigue, skin disorders and diarrhea were the most frequent grade 3-4 side effects. Treatment discontinuation occurred in 25 patients. The starting dose for the last 13 enrolled patients was 400 mg/day; in the absence of toxicity this dosage was gradually increased to 800 mg/day after 3 weeks ('ramp-up strategy'). No grade 3/4 adverse events were observed in the ramp-up group. CONCLUSION: Sorafenib is a valid treatment option for advanced-stage HCC. Starting at a lower dosage may allow prolonged compliance to treatment and might be considered according to patient tolerance.

Transarterial chemoembolization in very early and early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients excluded from curative treatment: a prospective cohort study.

AIM: To assess clinical outcome of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in a series of patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), within Milan criteria, but clinically unfit for liver transplantation (OLT). METHODS: From January 2006 to May 2009, 67 patients (43 males, mean age 70 ± 7.6 years) with very early or early-stage unresectable HCC, within Milan selection criteria but clinically unfit for OLT, underwent TACE. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival. Secondary endpoints were: safety, liver toxicity, 1-month tumour response according to the amended RECIST criteria, time to local and distant intrahepatic tumour recurrence and time to radiological progression. RESULTS: Two major periprocedural complications occurred (3%), consisting of liver failure. Periprocedural mortality rate was 1.5% (1 patient). A significant increase in ALT and bilirubin levels 24h after treatment was reported, with progressive decrease at discharge. At 1-month follow-up, complete and partial tumour response rates were 67.2% and 29.8%, respectively, with two cases of progressive disease. Mean follow-up was 37.3 ± 15 months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 90.9%, 86.1%, and 80.5%, respectively. Median expected time to local tumour recurrence and intrahepatic tumour recurrence were 7.9 and 13.8 months, respectively. Radiological disease progression was observed in 12 patients (17.9%) with a mean expected time of 26.5 months. CONCLUSION: In patients with early-stage HCC, clinically excluded from OLT and unfit for surgery or percutaneous ablation, TACE is a safe and effective option, with favourable long-term survival.