Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Affect Disord ; 323: 748-754, 2023 02 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36535547

ABSTRACT

Despite psychedelic research initially ceasing in the 1970-80s, the findings documented encouraged researchers to re-examine the safety and efficacy of treating mental health with psychedelics. Of particular focus, psilocybin has shown to have therapeutic potential for a variety of mental health problems and was granted breakthrough therapy status by the FDA. Should psilocybin eventually become legally licensed, the success of Psilocybin-Assisted Therapy (PAT) may largely rely on clinicians' openness to engage their eligible patients with PAT. We therefore assessed 119 psychologists' openness to recommend PAT, perceived barriers/facilitators to informing patients about PAT, and factors affecting their openness to involve patients with PAT if FDA approved. While 77.4 % of psychologists agreed they would inform eligible patients about PAT, 91.6 % stated they would still recommend psychotherapies that do not involve psilocybin first. 76.5 % endorsed that knowledge on psilocybin would increase their likelihood to inform patients about PAT. More positive attitudes and beliefs about psilocybin, greater self-reported knowledge of psilocybin, personal history of psychedelic usage, and more positive attitudes towards medical cannabis (MC) was associated with greater openness to engage patients with PAT. Our regression analysis revealed that attitudes towards MC and beliefs about psilocybin were the only significant predictors of psychotherapists' openness towards PAT. These findings provide relevant information to institutions planning educational programs for mental health professionals about psilocybin and Psychedelic-Assisted Therapies.


Subject(s)
Hallucinogens , Psilocybin , Humans , Psilocybin/therapeutic use , Hallucinogens/therapeutic use , Mental Health , Psychotherapists , Psychotherapy
2.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse ; 43(4): 402-415, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27494547

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The co-occurrence of depression and substance use disorders (SUD) is highly prevalent and associated with poor treatment outcomes for both disorders. As compared to individuals suffering from either disorder alone, individuals with both conditions are likely to endure a more severe and chronic clinical course with worse treatment outcomes. Thus, current practice guidelines recommend treating these co-occurring disorders simultaneously. OBJECTIVES: The overarching aims of this narrative are two-fold: (1) to provide an updated review of the current empirical status of integrated psychotherapy approaches for SUD and depression comorbidity, based on models of traditional cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and newer third-wave CBT approaches, including acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions and behavioral activation (BA); and (2) to propose a novel theoretical framework for transdiagnostic CBT for SUD-depression, based upon empirically grounded psychological mechanisms underlying this highly prevalent comorbidity. RESULTS: Traditional CBT approaches for the treatment of SUD-depression are well-studied. Despite advances in the development and evaluation of various third-wave psychotherapies, more work needs to be done to evaluate the efficacy of such approaches for SUD-depression. CONCLUSION: Informed by this summary of the evidence, we propose a transdiagnostic therapy approach that aims to integrate treatment elements found in empirically supported CBT-based interventions for SUD and depression. By targeting shared cognitive-affective processes underlying SUD-depression, transdiagnostic treatment models have the potential to offer a novel clinical approach to treating this difficult-to-treat comorbidity and relevant, co-occurring psychiatric disturbances, such as posttraumatic stress.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Depression/therapy , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Depression/complications , Depression/epidemiology , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Humans , Prevalence , Substance-Related Disorders/complications , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
3.
Trials ; 15: 161, 2014 May 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24886581

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorders (BD) are among the most severe mental disorders with first clinical signs and symptoms frequently appearing in adolescence and early adulthood. The long latency in clinical diagnosis (and subsequent adequate treatment) adversely affects the course of disease, effectiveness of interventions and health-related quality of life, and increases the economic burden of BD. Despite uncertainties about risk constellations and symptomatology in the early stages of potentially developing BD, many adolescents and young adults seek help, and most of them suffer substantially from symptoms already leading to impairments in psychosocial functioning in school, training, at work and in their social relationships. We aimed to identify subjects at risk of developing BD and investigate the efficacy and safety of early specific cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy (CBT) in this subpopulation. METHODS/DESIGN: EarlyCBT is a randomised controlled multi-centre clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early specific CBT, including stress management and problem solving strategies, with elements of mindfulness-based therapy (MBT) versus unstructured group meetings for 14 weeks each and follow-up until week 78. Participants are recruited at seven university hospitals throughout Germany, which provide in- and outpatient care (including early recognition centres) for psychiatric patients. Subjects at high risk must be 15 to 30 years old and meet the combination of specified affective symptomatology, reduction of psychosocial functioning, and family history for (schizo)affective disorders. Primary efficacy endpoints are differences in psychosocial functioning and defined affective symptomatology at 14 weeks between groups. Secondary endpoints include the above mentioned endpoints at 7, 24, 52 and 78 weeks and the change within groups compared to baseline; perception of, reaction to and coping with stress; and conversion to full BD. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate early specific CBT in subjects at high risk for BD. Structured diagnostic interviews are used to map the risk status and development of disease. With our study, the level of evidence for the treatment of those young patients will be significantly raised. TRIAL REGISTRATION: WHO International Clinical Trials Platform (ICTRP), identifier: DRKS00000444, date of registration: 16 June 2010.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/prevention & control , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Early Medical Intervention , Research Design , Adaptation, Psychological , Adolescent , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/etiology , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Clinical Protocols , Early Diagnosis , Germany , Humans , Mindfulness , Predictive Value of Tests , Problem Solving , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Stress, Psychological/complications , Stress, Psychological/therapy , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
4.
Maturitas ; 76(2): 189-99, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23932426

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Given the biological complexity of the ageing process, there is no single, simple and reliable measure of how healthily someone is ageing. Intervention studies need a panel of measures which capture key features of healthy ageing. To help guide our research in this area, we have adopted the concept of the "Healthy Ageing Phenotype" (HAP) and this study aimed to (i) identify the most important features of the HAP and (ii) identify/develop tools for measurement of those features. METHODS: After a comprehensive assessment of the literature we selected the following domains: physiological and metabolic health, physical capability, cognitive function, social wellbeing, and psychological wellbeing which we hoped would provide a reasonably holistic characterisation of the HAP. We reviewed the literature and identified systematic reviews and/or meta-analysis of cohort studies, and clinical guidelines on outcome measures of these domains relevant to the HAP. Selection criteria for these measures included: frequent use in longitudinal studies of ageing; expected to change with age; evidence for strong association with/prediction of ageing-related phenotypes such as morbidity, mortality and lifespan; whenever possible, focus on studies measuring these outcomes in populations rather than on individuals selected on the basis of a particular disease; (bio)markers that respond to (lifestyle-based) intervention. Proposed markers were exposed to critique in a Workshop held in Newcastle, UK in October 2012. RESULTS: We have selected a tentative panel of (bio)markers of physiological and metabolic health, physical capability, cognitive function, social wellbeing, and psychological wellbeing which we propose may be useful in characterising the HAP and which may have utility as outcome measures in intervention studies. In addition, we have identified a number of tools which could be applied in community-based intervention studies designed to enhance healthy ageing. CONCLUSIONS: We have proposed, tentatively, a panel of outcome measures which could be deployed in community-based, lifestyle intervention studies. The evidence base for selection of measurement domains is less well developed in some areas e.g. social wellbeing (where the definition of the concept itself remains elusive) and this has implications for the identification of appropriate tools. Although we have developed this panel as potential outcomes for intervention studies, we recognise that broader agreement on the concept of the HAP and on tools for its measurement could have wider utility and e.g. could facilitate comparisons of healthy ageing across diverse study designs and populations.


Subject(s)
Aging/physiology , Aging/psychology , Life Style , Quality of Life , Female , Humans , Male
5.
J Affect Disord ; 135(1-3): 380-3, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21705091

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder and risk for mania are associated with setting high goals and dysregulated goal pursuit. One mechanism mediating between setting high goals and manic symptoms could be daydreaming or more generally, mental imagery. 'Daydreams' (as one form of mental imagery) are characterized by the fact that the content is produced deliberately. Akiskal et al. (1995) reported that daydreaming prospectively predicted a switch from unipolar depression to bipolar disorder. We here hypothesized that risk for mania should also be associated with increased daydreaming after controlling for depression. METHOD: N=249 participants from a non-clinical, community sample completed several self-report measures including the Hypomanic Personality scale and Daydreaming scale. RESULTS: Hierarchical regression revealed that risk for mania predicted daydreaming after controlling for current and former depression. LIMITATIONS: Only self-report measures were used. The sample was a non-clinical, primarily White British sample, which has implications for generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations our results support the hypothesis that vulnerability for mania is associated with daydreaming. Daydreaming was related to mania and depression which highlights that it might be relevant for the etiology or maintenance of mood disorders.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Fantasy , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Cyclothymic Disorder/complications , Depression , Depressive Disorder/complications , Female , Goals , Humans , Male , Mood Disorders/complications , Regression Analysis , Risk , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL